I have seen 2 McMahon ads surfing the Internet so far this morning

sb10

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2007
Messages
205
One on Drudge Report. One on Michelle Malkin.

Peter, get your ads out there!!!!
 
I've seen Peter's ads on YouTube.

But if you want more, donate to the campaign.
 
Me too, and I see her commercials all day.

I don't see how Schiff can topple her, but I hope I'm wrong.
 
I see her ads all the time. That's what 16 million dollars buys.

The way to beat her, MRocked, is to keep raising money, but primarily with a very strong grassroots effort.

No one with Peter Schiff's national support and money raised in such a small state should not garner a significant portion of the vote. The fact that it is Peter Schiff, of all people, makes me hopeful that he can win.
 
How many registered Republicans are in Connecticut? I'd like to see a DVD of:
...mailed to each one of them.

DVDs are ineffective. The better strategy is to tell individuals where to find these videos so that they do their own research on the candidate. This is most comfortable to the individual, and much more likely to bring success.
 
Me too, and I see her commercials all day.

I don't see how Schiff can topple her, but I hope I'm wrong.

Think about it this way. Why do people donate to candidate's campaigns? So that the candidate can use the money to hire other people (advertisers, callers, door-knockers, etc.) to get the word out about their campaign.

There's no way we can outfundraise Linda McMahon. Even in the heyday of the national Ron Paul campaign, we raised 30 some million dollars for him, over the course of a year. Well, Linda McMahon's got 50 million right here, right now. But it doesn't matter.

Peter doesn't need to pay anyone to get the word out about his campaign if we all just get the word out about his campaign FOR him. We can do all the things that Peter would have used money to pay people to do, and we can do it for free, as volunteers.

There is no doubt in my mind that we can outvolunteer McMahon, both in terms of numbers and [definitely] intensity and passion. That is the path that leads to a Schiff victory.
 
First of all, I really wish we had a campaign liaison on this forum as we did before with Eftychis (I think that was his name). That way, we could collaborate better and any of our ideas wouldn't fall on deaf ears.
 
First of all, I really wish we had a campaign liaison on this forum as we did before with Eftychis (I think that was his name). That way, we could collaborate better and any of our ideas wouldn't fall on deaf ears.

No one from the campaign moniters this forum? Well, I know the campaign staff is active on the meetup list. You could always do it that way.

http://www.meetup.com/CT-Supports-Peter-Schiff-for-U-S-Senate/
 
I'm not on the campaign but I am an independent advisor to Peter and read the forums.

About the ads, Linda is targeting Peter Schiff supporters with her keywords set to +Peter Schiff -Ron Paul so that her ads show up worldwide to Schiff supporters on articles unrelated to Ron Paul, like this one, but otherwise she is mainly targeting CT.

Its all about the money really, she has enough of it even to pay a 30% premium to a guy who knows what he's doing. Its not me, but I wish it was knowing how much shes paying people to do things. I don't even think she can win against Blumenthing and I have no idea why she thinks she can, she's mad.

About supporters filling in for what money can buy, well not really. There's something called the 1% rule online. While a lot of people have donated, not all of them will give time every day to reach out to supporters online, especially as it isn't easy.

I don't know what to say really. Things aren't looking too good.
 
Back
Top