I hate to admit it but I have no clue what's up with Benghazi and Hillary

From Wiki:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Benghazi_attack

The 2012 Benghazi attack took place on the evening of September 11, 2012, when Islamic militants attacked the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, killing U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and U.S. Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith.[7] Stevens was the first U.S. Ambassador killed in the line of duty since 1979.[8] The attack has also been referred to as the Battle of Benghazi.[9]

Several hours later, a second assault targeted a different compound about one mile away, killing two CIA contractors, Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty.[10][11] Ten others were also injured in the attacks.

Many Libyans condemned the attacks and praised the late ambassador. They staged public demonstrations condemning the militias (formed during the civil war to oppose leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi),[12][13][14] which were suspected of the attacks.

The United States immediately increased security worldwide at diplomatic and military facilities and began investigating the Benghazi attack.[15][16] In the aftermath of the attack, State Department officials were criticized for denying requests for additional security at the consulate prior to the attack. As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton subsequently took responsibility for the security lapses.[17]

On August 6, 2013, it was reported that the U.S. had filed criminal charges against several individuals, including militia leader Ahmed Abu Khattala, for alleged involvement in the attacks.[18] Khattala has been described by Libyan and U.S. officials as the Benghazi leader of Ansar al-Sharia, which was listed in January 2014 by the U.S. Department of State as a terror organization.[19][20][21] On the weekend of June 14, 2014, U.S. Army special operations forces, in coordination with the FBI, captured Khattala in Libya.[22]

Initially, it was reported by the media the Benghazi attack was a spontaneous protest triggered by an anti-Muslim video, Innocence of Muslims.[23] Subsequent investigations determined that there was no such protest and that the attacks were premeditated;[24] though captured suspect Ahmed Abu Khattala stated that the assault was in retaliation for the video.[25]

"Diplomatic Compound" = whatever that means.
 
If he wasn't at the embassy, then... that wasn't a State Department asset. If he was, then yes. You can't have it both ways.

Somebody from either party should have totally brought that up during the hearing, but they didn't.
 
Somebody from either party should have totally brought that up during the hearing, but they didn't.

That's because the purpose of the investigation and committee - both parties - is Hillary. This is the eighth investigation. They've all come to the same conclusions. Did you see any of the others on the news? Any media reporting at all?
 
You understand that the government considers people assets right? So an ambassador is an "asset" whether he was at an embassy or not. Good grief you come up with some lame arguments....like always.
touche'
 
Is this just a diversion from something bigger?

Thanks.


POINT 1)
Benghazi was the bodega the US was using to smuggle guns via the CIA from anti Ghadaffi to anti Assad terrorists.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...-in-Benghazi-when-consulate-was-attacked.html

POINT 2)
There were repeated documented requests for more security at the "embassy"; aka black weapons transfer station.
http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin...y-clintons-state-department-reduced-security/


Therefore:

"The consulate’s only mission was to provide cover for the moving of arms. It had no real political role."

The desire of Hillary Clinton's State Department to maintain a low profile in Benghazi has been cited as the reason why the State Department circumvented their own Overseas Security Policy Board (OSPB) standards for diplomatic security.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Benghazi_attack



and that's about all there is to it.


...well there's some more info on the Ambassador here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannon_fodder
 
Last edited:
In addition to other's comments, it's easy to then take a very educated guess that after the Benghazi debacle (stand down ordered because dead men tell no tales) and the sarin gas false flag (blamed on Assad but actually used by the "rebels") failed to win support for Syria intervention, 'ISIS' was birthed to take another crack at the Assad problem.

That's because the purpose of the investigation and committee - both parties - is Hillary. This is the eighth investigation. They've all come to the same conclusions. Did you see any of the others on the news? Any media reporting at all?

The absurdity of expecting the Republican Congress to do anything of substance is obvious. The neocons of the GOP were as supportive of the mission as the neocons of the Democrats. Who really thinks McCain (remember his pics with the FSA?) and Hillary are on opposite sides of this issue? lol

eta: Gowdy stumped for Jeb today.
 
Last edited:
Theres an old Army guideline for Commissioned officer behavior. it states that they are to "profer no excuses" because the Army is about results. If you don't achieve results you are no good to the Army.

Why should Bush be allowed to profer them when he was Commander in Chief over ALL of the Army?

Why should Hillary be allowed to do so either when she is seeking to be Commander in Chief?

One rule for me but not for thee?


She was in charge. Whether she was unaware of just plain incompetent, she should have been relieved and not even be eligible to seek higher office.

There is no competence clause in Article II or anywhere else in teh CONstitution. Another epic Federalist fail.
 
Though technically Libya wasn't a country anymore at that point, thanks to Hillary. That is the real story, which is being completely obstructed by this stupid Benghazi crap. Hillary was the architect of the Libyan war which turned Libya in to a failed state run by regional warlords and allowed for the exportation of tons of weapons and munitions which would form the arsenal of what eventually would become ISIS. The CIA was using Libya as a staging ground to ship weapons to Syria, and it was while performing that duty that the Ambassador got killed.


Yep, this is the underlying reason, and I personally think that knowing what I know about Hillary Rotten Clinton, the ambassador was probably killed on purpose for knowing too much or whistleblowing. The clintons love to kill off anybody that is not in agreement with their corrupt ways.
 
And while this is a damaging ordeal for Hillary, Rand is right on track with starting to discuss the role of Hillarys corrupt deals while SOS, and the role Bill and their phony Clinton "charity" foundation had with those deals. FFS, she pimped out arms deals with foreign countries in order to turn a buck for her foundation. Nobody else is even mentioning this at the current time.
 
The absurdity of expecting the Republican Congress to do anything of substance is obvious. The neocons of the GOP were as supportive of the mission as the neocons of the Democrats. Who really thinks McCain (remember his pics with the FSA?) and Hillary are on opposite sides of this issue?

Exactly. They fundamentally agree with what the government was doing in Benghazi, and are trying to nail Hillary on mismanagement of the details because it's politically convenient for them. At no point will there be a discussion of "should we have been there in the first place?"
 
NPR had a little blurb that caught my ear last week:

WELNA: Well, none of them found any criminal wrongdoing. But several did fault the State Department as well as the intelligence agencies for inadequate security at the Benghazi diplomatic compound which was, in fact, mainly a CIA operation center.

But, of course, there's zero curiosity on NPR's part about what "mainly a CIA operation center" means, as both lefties and righties are A-OK with CIA ops around the world, apparently.

Political theater.
 
the effing republicans are such a pathetic bunch of idiots here. did anyone of those assclowns ask about CIA and running arms?

Congressman Pompeo spent about 40 seconds on it. He asked two questions about whether there was arms trafficking going on. Hillary gave a one-word answer, "No" both times. And that was it. No follow-up.
 
Back
Top