IT was not an Embassy.. it never was.
It was a Spook (CIA) house.
Now,, go from there
I know the feeling. An order from the WH would have solved the conflict between Africom and Centcom, however as that is where the launch order would have had to come from.Yes, we would have flown in on CH-53 helicopters. I believe we had 3 on the deck of our ship at that time.
We had the resources. There was military politics at play as well because we didn't fall under Africom but rather centcom and didn't want to give us up. It was stupid though, we should have gone in, we were there!
Now that's the first intelligent comment I have heard in here about this. Outstanding analysis.Apparently requests for security were made and denied.
Hillary said she wasn't aware of those requests.
Hillary said ambassador Stevens knew how to contact her directly and apparently he didn't? (Something seems odd here). Apparently important emails never reached Hillary.
Team Hillary blamed an "internet video" for weeks as the catalyst for the attack.
Apparently the day of and after (Hillary sent an email to Chelsea saying as much)... that the attack was not a result of the internet video.
And Hillary should be immediately disqualified from office because she is clearly incompetent. She was in charge, and security failed, it's on her.
The "internet video" excuse in my opinion was clearly a coverup to protect Obama with the election around the corner.
To be completely honest, I don't even know what the entire ordeal was about. What even happened?
I think the real question is, why didn't we just carpet bomb everything within a 20 square mile area surrounding the embassy. Or at least find some scapegoats and string up their disembowled remains outside the building.
Mankind has an 8000 year record of what works and what doesn't when it comes to running empires. If we're gonna do this thing, I wish to hell they would just stop phoning it in.
The CIA had a piece of property in Benghazi operating out of for their weapons smuggling ops to Syria. They likely were using it to temporarily store Libyan prisoners. The US ambassador was involved since he was at that location. Locals got pissed about itl and blowback ensued. A few federal agents got their comeuppance. The Obama Admin (Secretary of State Clinton included) tried to say it was because of an anti islamic youtube. The media, while covering up about what happened, lied and said there was an embassy in Benghazi, while the actual embassy was in Tripoli (our embassy was always in Tripoli). Republicans never acknowledged publicly what happened and instead relied upon the same old "because Obama" for the hearing and accomplished nothing.
I'm still not exactly clear on what the location of the embassy had to do with it or what Clinton's role was.
The CIA had a piece of property in Benghazi operating out of for their weapons smuggling ops to Syria. They likely were using it to temporarily store Libyan prisoners. The US ambassador was involved since he was at that location. Locals got pissed about itl and blowback ensued. A few federal agents got their comeuppance. The Obama Admin (Secretary of State Clinton included) tried to say it was because of an anti islamic youtube. The media, while covering up about what happened, lied and said there was an embassy in Benghazi, while the actual embassy was in Tripoli (our embassy was always in Tripoli). Republicans never acknowledged publicly what happened and instead relied upon the same old "because Obama" for the hearing and accomplished nothing.
Okay, if Hillary is responsible for Benghazi, is George W. Bush equally and personally responsible for the 9-11 Attack? Put him in the hot seat and interrogate him.
Her role was to protect those assets. That was her job and she failed at it. There are reasons she failed (like covering up for the CIA), but Republicans did not focus on it.
You are not supposed to have a clue. Just more of the usual D.C., smoke and mirrors and spin and BS.![]()