I give the Order! Load up your weapons

Calm down.......i'm the most militant bastard around here and i ain't ready to call off the other efforts yet.

(and even if i were i wouldn't admit to it on a public forum that supports someone i want to actually WIN ;) )
 
Taking arms is the secondary option and is what's going to happen if Ron Paul doesn't win, we're going to have an armed revolution if he doesn't win.Bit early to be making this thread....
 
Abyss19562 said:
Taking arms is the secondary option and is what's going to happen if Ron Paul doesn't win, we're going to have an armed revolution if he doesn't win.Bit early to be making this thread....
Click to expand...

Bad, bad idea. I really hope you're not serious because I could not possibly disagree more.

1) Violence is only ever permissible in self-defense of an immediate threat, and even then it must be proportional. This is not even close to the case now.

2) A revolution is very unlikely to succeed without the support of the populace, and on the very slight chance it does, it would be deeply immoral.

3) Such a revolution would discredit the cause of liberty in the eyes of the most people, and would be the perfect excuse for even more of a crackdown on our civil liberties.

4) This is the kind of crap that causes people like Glenn Beck, who might agree with Ron Paul otherwise, to be suspicious of the movement and ruin an otherwise perfectly-good interview with questions about the supporters.

You can't use anti-libertarian means to achieve a libertarian end. Nothing is more ant-libertarian than using violence or threats to try to change people's political views.
 
Ummmmmmm.......this thread is.....weird..............


And so to break this up with a little comedy relief..................


2001064191571729635_rs.jpg


This is about as far as it should go............... Let's put the dangerous toys away and play another day...........................
 
Last edited:
Abyss19562 said:
Taking arms is the secondary option and is what's going to happen if Ron Paul doesn't win, we're going to have an armed revolution if he doesn't win.Bit early to be making this thread....
Click to expand...

If we can't take our government back with the first amendment, it is our god given right to take it back with the 2nd... I think Jefferson expressed this sentiment in the Declaration of Independence... for all you apologist... you can stay home with your doors locked(your prison within a prison). Live free, or die.

OMFG-ONOZ.gif
 
Last edited:
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- 101 Things To Do 'Til The Revolution by Claire Wolfe
 
We still got a long way to go. A Democrat in the white house sure will speed up the process. But now days most of these "Republicans" are not much different either. Overall the sheeple are still asleep in this country. Wait until their being taxed to death and have to wait 6 months - 2 years to see a doctor in a government run healthcare system because it's over run by welfare babies who have stubbed toes. People will start to wake the hell up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Brian4Liberty
  • Featured
As Gaza Starves...US Green-Lights More US Weapons To Israel
Replies
3
Views
70
tpreitzel
T
PAF
Trump Orders Iran To Give Up Its "Perfectly Legal" Defensive Weapons
Replies
6
Views
88
jmdrake
jmdrake
PAF
Nuclear Weapons: Proliferation, Monopoly, or Disarmament?
Replies
0
Views
17
PAF
PAF
Matt Collins
The ‘Ghost Gun’ Linked to Luigi Mangione Shows Just How Far 3D-Printed Weapons Have Come
Replies
2
Views
2K
Matt Collins
Matt Collins
nikcers
Chicago mayor signs executive order in response to possible deployment of National Guard
Replies
8
Views
61
TheTexan
TheTexan
Back
Top