I can't believe what an admin at Huck's Army did

Jeremy

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Messages
12,580
They say we are welcome... no we aren't.

I posted a thread saying McCain did not win and gave a long explanation why RP won and why this is good for Huck

Someone posts and they don't believe it and think it was blown out of proportion saying uncommitted = simply anti-mccain

I then post a very long response proving it... but when I click post it says the thread is deleted. AND my account is deleted...

I've administrated forums for 3 years. I've seen a lot of things they've done that are BIG NO-NOs in the forum world

edit: And I was VERY polite. It was a pro-Huck thread o.0
 
They also deleted a thread of mine when I posted a possible deal.

What self indulgent jerks.
 
Man, this just keeps going.

Ok, I guess they don't want to work with us anymore. That's cool, we're even for our delegates assisting them for their WV win, apparently.

You try to be nice and work together, and you get banned. No problem, we won't forget.
 
They say we are welcome... no we aren't.

I posted a thread saying McCain did not win and gave a long explanation why RP won and why this is good for Huck

Someone posts and they don't believe it and think it was blown out of proportion saying uncommitted = simply anti-mccain

I then post a very long response proving it... but when I click post it says the thread is deleted. AND my account is deleted...

I've administrated forums for 3 years. I've seen a lot of things they've done that are BIG NO-NOs in the forum world

edit: And I was VERY polite. It was a pro-Huck thread o.0

I'm assuming you're talking about Washington, right? Would you be able to post the full post that you made here? I'm just curious to read it so I can better understand what happened there, especially if you prove that Paul won.
 
They say we are welcome... no we aren't.

I posted a thread saying McCain did not win and gave a long explanation why RP won and why this is good for Huck

Someone posts and they don't believe it and think it was blown out of proportion saying uncommitted = simply anti-mccain

I then post a very long response proving it... but when I click post it says the thread is deleted. AND my account is deleted...

I've administrated forums for 3 years. I've seen a lot of things they've done that are BIG NO-NOs in the forum world

edit: And I was VERY polite. It was a pro-Huck thread o.0

my original account was banned here for saying things people didnt like
 
I'm glad we're not shallow enough to give ourselves a nickname like "Ron's Army". We let the media decide whatever the hell they want to call us, the irony is that the same type of people who gave us names gave themselves a name- Huck's Army. They're too uptight, they can't see the whole picture.
 
I'm assuming you're talking about Washington, right? Would you be able to post the full post that you made here? I'm just curious to read it so I can better understand what happened there, especially if you prove that Paul won.

I don't have my first post logged, but this was my 2nd that never got through

I remember some Paul supporters were all excited on the 9th because there was this article that said Paul had 49%. They thought he won the state right there, but it turned out it was just one district. It was a well populated district though, and there were other reports of high Paul-supporter turnout (from local media). It wouldn't make sense for him to do so well in that district and not everywhere else. Washington was a state that always had a lot of Paul support.

I also know, personally, that Washington people in the RP grassroots said they agreed not to publicly announce who they were for. If you think the big uncommitted group is simply anti-McCain... why did Kansas get 0%? Kansas 0% to Washington 13%. It wouldn't make sense.

I wouldn't be telling you this if it wasn't coming from multiple sources. And why wouldn't it make sense? The RP people said they were afraid if the GOP knew they were for Paul they wouldn't be delegates. Sounds weird.. but the RP supporters have always been treated unfairly. This was their plan. And this is how it works in a caucus... you don't have to tell people and it doesn't have to show up in the straw poll.
 
look folks

I went into the Huck forum and saw a thread about the delegate situation. They were posting back and forth that if Romney "gives" his delegates to McCain it's over. Gave me the impression they have no idea how the process works and I figured it might not be a good idea making a long post trying to explain it to them. Why freely give them the knowledge that the Revolution has earned through a great deal of work.

In short, if Huck supporters believe the Old Media reports just comiserate with them and promise to fight to keep McCain out.
 
my original account was banned here for saying things people didnt like

Ya mean like as in trolling. Nah.. You probably weren't.. You were just shooting a bunch of negative BS into the board and that an't trolling..that is debate.. haha! You clowns.

Randy
 
You all know that your guy is done unless we can get this to a brokered convention. The only way that is going to happen is for you all to vote for Huckabee in the upcoming primaries and caucuses. Some of you are willing to. Some aren't. You just need to decide how badly you want a brokered convention. This is something you have to do without the help of Huckabee supporters.

We're not done, regardless of the convention :) Hope you all are out there canvassing to bring about that brokered convention, I think Huck is relying on one too. Best of luck.
 
Back
Top