How will Rand Paul implement his agenda?

Stannis

Banned
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
38
Let's say Rand Paul is elected president:

1. How will Rand Paul deal with the filibuster in the Senate? It looks like the Democrats will hold their 46 seats in the chamber and maybe even take control following the 2016 elections. If either of those two things happen, then any bill other than criminal justice is DOA unless he somehow persuades the Republicans to use the nuclear option. Where does he stand on this? Does he even have enough goodwill among Repubs to take this drastic stance?


2. How will Rand manage the different Republican House factions? At present, there are about 25+ Freedom Caucus hardliners who are friendly to Rand's viewpoints. The rest are either wishy-washy Repubs or Dems. How will he persuade them to pass his agenda? Is he friendly with the House leadership? Can he get McCarthy to pass his bills or will he prod the Freedom Caucus into another revolt?


3. Rand Paul's viewpoints are antithetical to many in the federal bureaucracy. Will he fire them all and replace them with more liberty-minded appointees or retain most of them to earn goodwill? Who will be these liberty-minded appointees? And how will he deal with Bush and Obama's "burrowers," people that they've implanted so deep in the bureaucracy network that they basically can't be fired and yet exert wide control over policy?


4. What is Rand's position on the judiciary? What kind of justices is he looking to put in there? Scalia-types or maybe even a throwback to William Douglas? Will he pressure justices publicly to issue decisions favorable to him like Obama did or just stay silent?


5. How will Rand Paul resist the urge for endless wars? Fire all the generals who are hawks and replace them with doves? Close all our military bases abroad? Get the Saudis and Egypt to lead in the region instead of relying on our handouts? But then you get into the issue of impoundments, which the Supreme Court has ruled illegal. How will Rand Paul shrink our bloated war budget if the vast majority of both parties are for more war?


6. Will Paul pardon Snowden and shutdown the illegal NSA and CIA surveillance? How will he counter the massive pushback from these agencies?


7. How will Rand Paul deal with the media? They will launch daily attacks saying he is ruining the country. Circumvent them and go the route of FDR's radio broadcasts or Reagan's many Oval Office addresses and speak directly to the people?


I like Rand the best out of all the Republicans and I hope he wins, but he might be in legitimate danger of assassination if he tries to implement his agenda too quickly.
 
Last edited:
end the filibuster. but GOP establishment might be a problem also. a lot can be done with executive orders, esp with foreign policy
 
end the filibuster. but GOP establishment might be a problem also. a lot can be done with executive orders, esp with foreign policy

I thought the whole point of Rand was to stop the use of executive overreach?

Obama seems to advance his agenda just fine without Congress.

That's because he has expanded federal power, which Rand is not going to do.
 
Of course a President Paul would be assassinated if he tried to do all of that. I don't think any of his supporters are expecting miracles.

As for judges, I doubt Paul would pick leftists or a throwback to a guy who thought that trees should have standing and supported decisions like Roe. Scalia is closer to the kind of justice he'd pick, though I'd expect judges slightly more libertarian than that.
 
Of course a President Paul would be assassinated if he tried to do all of that. I don't think any of his supporters are expecting miracles.

As for judges, I doubt Paul would pick leftists or a throwback to a guy who thought that trees should have standing and supported decisions like Roe. Scalia is closer to the kind of justice he'd pick, though I'd expect judges slightly more libertarian than that.

What is your ideal justice then?
 
B0oA7MdIQAAn9V4.jpg
 
How the hell do you expect him to do it?



The seniority-infused KMA (for 'kiss my ass', which is what they say if someone asks them to do some actual work) bureaucrats won't be able to fight their firing, if they aren't fired, they're laid off--along with everyone in their entire now-closed department.

He will chase the alligators out of Washington wholesale, ruthlessly, and at great personal risk. Name me another way it can be done.

Or were we not paying attention when Ron Paul taught us that all of these bureaus were placed under the Executive Branch, and ultimately, answer only to the president?
 
Last edited:
He won't be assassinated nor impeached but there will be federal employees falsely claiming to be on strike. They will call their unions and protest in Washington and the media will claim that Rand is a failure for allowing this strike to continue. The low information voters will fall for it and his approval ratings will drop. Then the democrats will come back into office and put these programs back on the table. Until someone deals with the media this country won't ever be free.
 
He won't be assassinated nor impeached...

Things like this were said about JFK, Reagan and Clinton, too. And it was also once completely unthinkable that Nixon would ever resign from a position of power.

but there will be federal employees falsely claiming to be on strike.

Uh huh. Well, PATCO didn't exactly win hearts by striking, and what the air traffic controllers do is something that Americans actually want done. I can just imagine what the reaction would be if the IRS or OSHA went on strike...
 
He can and should be tough. Threaten to veto everything under the sun if he doesn't get his way.

It works for Obama.
 
Which Cabinet position do you think he will give to Benton? Agriculture?
 
I'd like to see him put Benton as Secretary of Education and then abolish the department 

A president cannot unilaterally abolish a federal department. That requires an Act of Congress. And it would be tough to get such a bill through the Senate considering the Democrats can mount a filibuster.
 
Back
Top