How Narrow Is The Way?

chiplitfam

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2007
Messages
834
Narrow is the way which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it (Matthew 7:14)
HOW NARROW IS THE WAY?

If ever there was a time when a disciple of Christ should stand out in contrast to his contemporaries, it is in this generation when all the world agrees that man has reached a low point in morality. Perhaps that is exactly why people who take their faith seriously are in danger of being accused of belonging to a cult and marked as a threat to society and the establishment.
The world considers success as power, wealth and fame. All of this was brushed aside by Jesus, who taught us to put away the sword and to turn the other cheek. Treasures are to be laid up in heaven, not upon the earth which is passing away. Worldly fame, that which is exalted among men, "is an abomination in the sight of God" (Luke 16:15).

The mainstream churches of today honor the wealthy and stick their names on their buildings, windows and effects. They glory in power and the popularity of their leaders. They copy the glamour of the world's entertainers, aping their music and style.

One who denies self and worldly values not only faces the world's rejection, but too often he cannot fit into the mainstream church, which considers him a fanatic. However, the purpose here is not to criticize the modern church, but to challenge believers to a self-examination in answering the question: Am I in the way that Jesus called narrow, or am I walking the broad way?

Jesus said, "He that hateth his life in this world shall keep it unto life eternal" (John 12:25). This indicates that the way of life approved by God is in opposition to the way of the world. To walk His way is to go against the flow, which draws the world's scorn. Such a way of life is foreign to the barbarian culture of our day. In Peter's words, we are "strangers and pilgrims" (1 Peter 2:11). A pilgrim in a foreign land has no power, is seen as curiously different, and often is unwelcome. This was the condition of the church in Peter's day. Contrast this with modern churches which fear nothing so much as to be considered different from the community and without worldly recognition.

The narrow way is opposed to the world because of the direction it is leading—away from society's norm to the holiness of God, away from the world's values to spiritual values, away from the world's temporal pleasures, which will have no value in the end—to the eternal. It is other-worldly. The very expression prompts sneers from the sophisticated.

Christ's purpose is a life that transcends all earth-bound dreams. It is distasteful to the world because modern man is grounded in humanism, with the idea that with enough co-operation and ardor we can bring about the perfect world where everyone is supplied with all the desires his sinful nature demands.

Such a way is broad and popular all over the world. Revolutionaries and patriots alike have been willing to die for such Utopian dreams. Even a great number of Christians are more zealous for national reformation than spiritual regeneration and more concerned for the Constitution than for the commands of Christ.
The way of humanism is to have all men conform to the world that there may be no conflict. The way of Christ is to have all men conform to the image of God, in conflict with the world. It requires a certain detachment from the world and takes issue with the world.

The narrow way is opposed to the world. "If you were of the world, the world would love its own," Jesus said, "but because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you" (John 15:19). He explained that this was because "they know not him that sent me." Nothing evokes the world's anger like the claim Jesus made: "No man cometh unto the Father but by me" (John 14:6). Those who know not Jehovah God reject this claim to exclusiveness. They think that all religions are to be recognized as equal. When the president of the Southern Baptist Convention publicly stated that there was no salvation outside of Christ, the media over the whole nation arose in protest. Such exclusive claims by Jesus brand as false all the other gods and religions of the world. They either have to admit it is true or oppose it. Of course, they oppose it.

The builders of the New World Order realize that true disciples of Jesus will never give up their loyalty and obedience to Christ, nor willingly subject their families to the pagan powers. Therefore, there is a great propaganda campaign to denigrate all Christians who refuse to abandon their convictions in order to fit into life on the broad way. The narrow way is bitterly opposed.

The broad way is the collective way, socially acceptable and for the "good of society." It is the way of the majority vote, denominational approval and the popular format of public worship where people go to witness and applaud the performance of church leaders. In many circumstances one may attend "worship" and never lose step with the world by giving a solemn thought to his personal condition before God. He is one with the crowd.

Christ deals with individuals. His commands must be obeyed by individuals. He Himself prayed alone, obeyed alone, and stood alone against the enemy. No one could do His work for Him.
Faith cannot be delegated, divided up and assigned to a committee. We have Abraham for an example of faith. When he bound Isaac to the altar on the mountain in Moriah, he stood alone, with no one watching—only God. This was the narrow way.

The idea prevails that bigger is better, making things easier by increasing the size of the crowd, making the road broader. Things seem easier and more successful when done by a multitude. So we have made the narrow way a broad way by eliminating one’s individual experience. Man dares not be alone, to make an inward examination, to ponder his own heart before God, and to make the commitment for which there is no earthly reward in the form of approval, applause or acceptance. He makes his "decision" for Christ in the crowded auditorium, cheered on to the strains of an invitational hymn.

What will he do alone on the narrow way, where, like Abraham, he must work out his salvation with fear and trembling with only God to see? Or, when, like Jesus, he will do the will of God in private and be put to shame in public? Narrow is the way!

Men seek honor from the crowd, the multitude, from organizations and institutions. Jesus asked, "How can you believe, who receive honor one of another, and seek not the honor that cometh from God only?" (John 5:44) "If any man will serve me, him will my Father honor" (John 12:26).
This is the narrow way, to set out on the course that will be unsung by men, where your sacrifice will be unseen and your name forgotten, where you will receive nothing from man. And if he takes note of you at all it will be to persecute or scorn you. Blessed are you! Such was the way of Christ.

Curtis Dickinson, (1920 - 2004), Editor, The WITNESS Newsletter, Lewisville, Texas 75029
 
Such a way is broad and popular all over the world. Revolutionaries and patriots alike have been willing to die for such Utopian dreams. Even a great number of Christians are more zealous for national reformation than spiritual regeneration and more concerned for the Constitution than for the commands of Christ.

You've got us confused with somebody else, friend. The Constitution is not an end, but a means to an end. The end goal is liberty. Liberty allows us to meet God on our own terms. Liberty helps clothe and feed and shelter the unfortunate. Promoting liberty in today's political climate, and in most political climates, is a very narrow way.

How many more people in ancient Nazareth and Jerusalem could have received the message if the Pharisees had practiced the tolerance proscribed by the Constitution, rather than nailing Teachers to crosses?
 
There is a difference between knowing the path, and walking the path. Oh wait, that was a movie quote.
 
thanks for that. it's in an extra note my Dad wrote in the front of his Bible, which he brought when he came to America. it was one of his constant considerations.
my paternts did not like church here, so i did not have a public church exposure. i still choose not to belong to a religion, but like to think about these things sometimes.
i cannot like that i should hate my life, however. i love my life, and am happy in it.
 
You've got us confused with somebody else, friend. The Constitution is not an end, but a means to an end. The end goal is liberty. Liberty allows us to meet God on our own terms. Liberty helps clothe and feed and shelter the unfortunate. Promoting liberty in today's political climate, and in most political climates, is a very narrow way.
The passage you quoted strikes me, too, in a convicting sort of way-- and I think it's the point the article is trying to make: Are we so concerned for the Constitution and the political system that we (who are Christians in the movement) are overlooking the greater duty, which is to win people to Christ?

You're point is valid, acptulsa, for without liberty we (I don't know what you believe, acp, so understand "we" as "Christians") would surely not be able to practice our faith as effectively as we could with it-- but is that the point? Is being a Christian supposed to be easy? I think not. It is the hardest thing in the world, to live according to Jesus' teaching. It should be so simple, what he taught was simple love and massive faith.

Bible-believing Christians-- real, true Christians-- know that there is no hope on this planet through any human effort. I struggle with my defense of liberty and interest in politics because I know it is ultimately a losing battle on this earth-- the principalities and powers will have their way until Jesus comes back. I'm not looking to facilitate Armageddon like some Christians who think we need to stir up trouble in the middle east so Jesus will return sooner. But I am also a human, set on earth at this time and in this place and I know there is a job for me here. As a mother the most important job I have is protecting my children and that is what feeds my desire for liberty and justice and peace.

It's a struggle, and though I appreciate the OP, what is the answer? What is the motivation for posting that article? Are you struggling to find balance, too, chiplitfam?
 
It's a struggle, and though I appreciate the OP, what is the answer? What is the motivation for posting that article? Are you struggling to find balance, too, chiplitfam?

Fighting for liberty in the name of Christ is just as moral and noble a cause as those who fought for civil rights and equality under the law.

Certainly people are fighting for a lot of worse things in the name of God.
 
Even a great number of Christians are more zealous for national reformation than spiritual regeneration and more concerned for the Constitution than for the commands of Christ.

Amen! As a Christian man, this is something that I have struggled with.
 
Narrow is the way which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it (Matthew 7:14)
HOW NARROW IS THE WAY?

If ever there was a time when a disciple of Christ should stand out in contrast to his contemporaries, it is in this generation when all the world agrees that man has reached a low point in morality. Perhaps that is exactly why people who take their faith seriously are in danger of being accused of belonging to a cult and marked as a threat to society and the establishment.
The world considers success as power, wealth and fame. All of this was brushed aside by Jesus, who taught us to put away the sword and to turn the other cheek. Treasures are to be laid up in heaven, not upon the earth which is passing away. Worldly fame, that which is exalted among men, "is an abomination in the sight of God" (Luke 16:15).

The mainstream churches of today honor the wealthy and stick their names on their buildings, windows and effects. They glory in power and the popularity of their leaders. They copy the glamour of the world's entertainers, aping their music and style.

One who denies self and worldly values not only faces the world's rejection, but too often he cannot fit into the mainstream church, which considers him a fanatic. However, the purpose here is not to criticize the modern church, but to challenge believers to a self-examination in answering the question: Am I in the way that Jesus called narrow, or am I walking the broad way?

Jesus said, "He that hateth his life in this world shall keep it unto life eternal" (John 12:25). This indicates that the way of life approved by God is in opposition to the way of the world. To walk His way is to go against the flow, which draws the world's scorn. Such a way of life is foreign to the barbarian culture of our day. In Peter's words, we are "strangers and pilgrims" (1 Peter 2:11). A pilgrim in a foreign land has no power, is seen as curiously different, and often is unwelcome. This was the condition of the church in Peter's day. Contrast this with modern churches which fear nothing so much as to be considered different from the community and without worldly recognition.

The narrow way is opposed to the world because of the direction it is leading—away from society's norm to the holiness of God, away from the world's values to spiritual values, away from the world's temporal pleasures, which will have no value in the end—to the eternal. It is other-worldly. The very expression prompts sneers from the sophisticated.

Christ's purpose is a life that transcends all earth-bound dreams. It is distasteful to the world because modern man is grounded in humanism, with the idea that with enough co-operation and ardor we can bring about the perfect world where everyone is supplied with all the desires his sinful nature demands.

Such a way is broad and popular all over the world. Revolutionaries and patriots alike have been willing to die for such Utopian dreams. Even a great number of Christians are more zealous for national reformation than spiritual regeneration and more concerned for the Constitution than for the commands of Christ.
The way of humanism is to have all men conform to the world that there may be no conflict. The way of Christ is to have all men conform to the image of God, in conflict with the world. It requires a certain detachment from the world and takes issue with the world.

The narrow way is opposed to the world. "If you were of the world, the world would love its own," Jesus said, "but because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you" (John 15:19). He explained that this was because "they know not him that sent me." Nothing evokes the world's anger like the claim Jesus made: "No man cometh unto the Father but by me" (John 14:6). Those who know not Jehovah God reject this claim to exclusiveness. They think that all religions are to be recognized as equal. When the president of the Southern Baptist Convention publicly stated that there was no salvation outside of Christ, the media over the whole nation arose in protest. Such exclusive claims by Jesus brand as false all the other gods and religions of the world. They either have to admit it is true or oppose it. Of course, they oppose it.

The builders of the New World Order realize that true disciples of Jesus will never give up their loyalty and obedience to Christ, nor willingly subject their families to the pagan powers. Therefore, there is a great propaganda campaign to denigrate all Christians who refuse to abandon their convictions in order to fit into life on the broad way. The narrow way is bitterly opposed.

The broad way is the collective way, socially acceptable and for the "good of society." It is the way of the majority vote, denominational approval and the popular format of public worship where people go to witness and applaud the performance of church leaders. In many circumstances one may attend "worship" and never lose step with the world by giving a solemn thought to his personal condition before God. He is one with the crowd.

Christ deals with individuals. His commands must be obeyed by individuals. He Himself prayed alone, obeyed alone, and stood alone against the enemy. No one could do His work for Him.
Faith cannot be delegated, divided up and assigned to a committee. We have Abraham for an example of faith. When he bound Isaac to the altar on the mountain in Moriah, he stood alone, with no one watching—only God. This was the narrow way.

The idea prevails that bigger is better, making things easier by increasing the size of the crowd, making the road broader. Things seem easier and more successful when done by a multitude. So we have made the narrow way a broad way by eliminating one’s individual experience. Man dares not be alone, to make an inward examination, to ponder his own heart before God, and to make the commitment for which there is no earthly reward in the form of approval, applause or acceptance. He makes his "decision" for Christ in the crowded auditorium, cheered on to the strains of an invitational hymn.

What will he do alone on the narrow way, where, like Abraham, he must work out his salvation with fear and trembling with only God to see? Or, when, like Jesus, he will do the will of God in private and be put to shame in public? Narrow is the way!

Men seek honor from the crowd, the multitude, from organizations and institutions. Jesus asked, "How can you believe, who receive honor one of another, and seek not the honor that cometh from God only?" (John 5:44) "If any man will serve me, him will my Father honor" (John 12:26).
This is the narrow way, to set out on the course that will be unsung by men, where your sacrifice will be unseen and your name forgotten, where you will receive nothing from man. And if he takes note of you at all it will be to persecute or scorn you. Blessed are you! Such was the way of Christ.

Curtis Dickinson, (1920 - 2004), Editor, The WITNESS Newsletter, Lewisville, Texas 75029

This is the most absurd fascist hit piece I've read in a long time.
 
Bible-believing Christians-- real, true Christians-- know that there is no hope on this planet through any human effort. I struggle with my defense of liberty and interest in politics because I know it is ultimately a losing battle on this earth-- the principalities and powers will have their way until Jesus comes back.

You and I have profoundly different values. A frankly, you scare the shit out of me.
 
Wow, sorry. I promise I'm not very scary in real life. No one has ever said anything like that to me before. Do all Christians scare you or just me?
 
Wow, sorry. I promise I'm not very scary in real life. No one has ever said anything like that to me before. Do all Christians scare you or just me?

I love the Christians that I know and I love them even more individually. They don't scare me, and I can't imagine them getting out of hand. I am afraid of the Dominionists, Evangelicals, and the Reconstructionists.

I'm afraid of the abuse and the lack of tolerance I perceive now in society... I don't know how so many of them have allowed themselves to become so blind to their own teaching... even "hate the sin, love the sinner" is a inexcusable violation of Christian principles I was brought up in... one cannot hate the sin and impose "judgement" on the level of a god towards people, yet that is what Christian social policy tends to desire...

That's why we Christians are having so many kids compared to the liberals, humanists, agnostics, etc. because our posterity will carry Christian theocracy on to infinity. There's nothing that can be done to stop it, either, my friend. It came to fruition when the Puritans first arrived here in the 1600s, and it will continue to mature until all things are under Christ's feet. The end of tyranny from relativistic, secular "atheism" will come to pass. I will fight diligently to see "atheism" bleed to death, choking in its own blood, and I will stomp it right in its head until its blood is splattered all over my "garments". That's the war against terror that I fight in. So, just know that the next time you see one of my posts that my fight is against every thought and philosophy which is against those ends, but not the people who espouse those thoughts and philosophies. I'd just thought you should know.

Saying to me that there is no hope in human effort is telling me I have nothing to work for...
 
I love the Christians that I know and I love them even more individually. They don't scare me, and I can't imagine them getting out of hand. I am afraid of the Dominionists, Evangelicals, and the Reconstructionists.

I'm afraid of the abuse and the lack of tolerance I perceive now in society... I don't know how so many of them have allowed themselves to become so blind to their own teaching... even "hate the sin, love the sinner" is a inexcusable violation of Christian principles I was brought up in... one cannot hate the sin and impose "judgement" on the level of a god towards people, yet that is what Christian social policy tends to desire...



Saying to me that there is no hope in human effort is telling me I have nothing to work for...
I get what you're saying. It's why I don't go to church. It's why I don't have many Christian friends. It's not my place to judge anyone, even though I do at times, it's human failing on my part, I guess. But I believe what the Bible says, this earth will be destroyed because of evil. I often feel like my personal effort in the political, governmental and social arena is ultimately useless because of that, but I am no prophet. I have no idea when the end of the earth will be. So I fight on, for my kids, for a future free of persecution. Because I have a hunger and thirst for justice. I honestly believe that we're here now for a reason, in this place at this time. I hope it's because we will succeed but I don't know. There are certainly other things that are less worth fighting for and working towards and I don't intend to waste my time on those. Is this a waste of time? I don't know.

It's a struggle for me-- trying to balance my faith and my works. James says faith without works is dead. I feel compelled, and always have, to fight for liberty and justice. This is the work I feel most passionately about. Does that mean it's what I should be doing? I don't know. The OP brought up some issues I'm struggling with personally.

I didn't mean to make you or anyone else feel hopeless. It wasn't my intention. But your response makes me look at my approach to my own questions differently. If, indeed, it is my purpose to try to win people for Christ, and not to be active politically, I'm not being a very good ambassador if I'm perceived as scary. And if my work here is to be a guardian and warrior for liberty, the inspiration to do so is being lost in translation. I cannot separate the two so I must learn to reconcile them without watering down the message. God help me, I don't know. I'm really and truly sorry I made you feel badly about the good fight we're fighting here. Ultimately I think it does matter (even though at times I wonder).
 
I get what you're saying. It's why I don't go to church. It's why I don't have many Christian friends. It's not my place to judge anyone, even though I do at times, it's human failing on my part, I guess. But I believe what the Bible says, this earth will be destroyed because of evil. I often feel like my personal effort in the political, governmental and social arena is ultimately useless because of that, but I am no prophet. I have no idea when the end of the earth will be. So I fight on, for my kids, for a future free of persecution. Because I have a hunger and thirst for justice. I honestly believe that we're here now for a reason, in this place at this time. I hope it's because we will succeed but I don't know. There are certainly other things that are less worth fighting for and working towards and I don't intend to waste my time on those. Is this a waste of time? I don't know.

It's a struggle for me-- trying to balance my faith and my works. James says faith without works is dead. I feel compelled, and always have, to fight for liberty and justice. This is the work I feel most passionately about. Does that mean it's what I should be doing? I don't know. The OP brought up some issues I'm struggling with personally.

I didn't mean to make you or anyone else feel hopeless. It wasn't my intention. But your response makes me look at my approach to my own questions differently. If, indeed, it is my purpose to try to win people for Christ, and not to be active politically, I'm not being a very good ambassador if I'm perceived as scary. And if my work here is to be a guardian and warrior for liberty, the inspiration to do so is being lost in translation. I cannot separate the two so I must learn to reconcile them without watering down the message. God help me, I don't know. I'm really and truly sorry I made you feel badly about the good fight we're fighting here. Ultimately I think it does matter (even though at times I wonder).

I believe in liberty and freedom, and I believe that all that is required for someone to be a patriot is that they are well informed about their country. (A soldier's response).

If the world ends the way you think it does, I have strong enough principles and values that I would never change in fighting the side I personally see as the tyrant... I am not easily brainwashed or convinced of anything, I know what liberty looks like, and I know what tyranny looks like....

However, I personally believe our future is up to us... I think we can find common ground in pursuing liberty for all, regardless of what we expect for the future, as long as it doesn't destroy that potential.
 
I believe in liberty and freedom, and I believe that all that is required for someone to be a patriot is that they are well informed about their country. (A soldier's response).

If the world ends the way you think it does, I have strong enough principles and values that I would never change in fighting the side I personally see as the tyrant... I am not easily brainwashed or convinced of anything, I know what liberty looks like, and I know what tyranny looks like....

However, I personally believe our future is up to us... I think we can find common ground in pursuing liberty for all, regardless of what we expect for the future, as long as it doesn't destroy that potential.

I agree.
 
In my opinion no Christian would ever want to be President.

Wanting to be President goes against all that Jesus spoke about. I am AG but I was brought up in the bible and know many of its famous quotes and I cannot recollect anywhere where Jesus spoke about virtue in seeking earthly power. I am glad to support a man who does not want it for powers sake but only because his supporters want him to truly fix America and possibly the world for a while longer.
 
I disagree with the idea that Christians should not be in worldly leadership positions. Instead, Jesus implies that worldly leadership gives a particular insight into faith. See Matthew 8:

8The centurion replied, "Lord, I do not deserve to have you come under my roof. But just say the word, and my servant will be healed. 9For I myself am a man under authority, with soldiers under me. I tell this one, 'Go,' and he goes; and that one, 'Come,' and he comes. I say to my servant, 'Do this,' and he does it."

10When Jesus heard this, he was astonished and said to those following him, "I tell you the truth, I have not found anyone in Israel with such great faith.
 
I disagree with the idea that Christians should not be in worldly leadership positions. Instead, Jesus implies that worldly leadership gives a particular insight into faith. See Matthew 8:
I don't know, but it seems like quite a stretch to me. I think that Jesus was referring to the individual man, and not to his statist office held.
 
But note that he didn't tell the centurion to leave the army.

Similarly, he did not make Nicodemus leave the council of ethnarchs.

Jesus was a direct descendant of David and Solomon-- he certainly did not disparage worldly authority.

Peter did not make Cornelius give up being a centurion, either.

I think they simply accepted inequality of rank as a fact of life, and that those of higher rank had certain responsibilities.

Ephesians 6:
9And masters, treat your slaves in the same way. Do not threaten them, since you know that he who is both their Master and yours is in heaven, and there is no favoritism with him.
 
Back
Top