Honest Money Constitutional Amendment

Should the people be free to transact unimpeded in any currency they choose?


  • Total voters
    68
I like this article because it give Free Competition in Currencies as the true solution to restoring and maintaining a sound and honest monetary system.



Courtesy of Christian Science Monitor:
http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/T...ords-to-fix-our-monetary-system-End.-The.-Fed.

Three words to fix our monetary system: End. The. Fed.
The Federal Reserve's easy money policies are leading to tumultuous markets. Something drastic should be done.
By Joel Bowman, Guest blogger / April 25, 2011

Choppy week in the markets, wouldn’t you say? Gap down one day, gap up the next. That’s what you get when the tub is full of Fed-faked funny-money. Bigger waves…more tumult…less predictability. And a whole lotta motion sickness along the way.

Markets are always and forever in a process of price discovery, torn between demand for lower prices from buyers on one side, and the profit motive from sellers on the other. Somewhere in the middle, the two parties will come together to exchange their goods and services. In other words, they “discover” an agreeable price at which everyone finds value. This is what the free market does naturally. Low prices invite demand…driving prices higher. High prices invite competition (supply)…driving prices lower.
Obviously, therefore, you expect a bit of movement, a bit of price fluctuation as buyers and sellers jostle for position. What you don’t expect is multi-hundred point daily swings in the stock markets. You don’t expect gold to jump $20, $30 or more in a 24-hour period. (Remember, before FDR confiscated all the gold in the land back in 1933, an ounce of gold was only “worth” $20. More correctly, a dollar was worth 1/20th an ounce of gold. Then, in one fell swoop, the original New Dealer “revalued” the metal to $35 an ounce, thereby devaluing the dollar to 1/35th an ounce of gold.)
The point is, a $20 or $30 movement in the price of gold back then would have been unthinkable (but for political strong-arming). Today, with the dollar having been beaten, bludgeoned and fisticuffed down to less than 1/1,500th an ounce of gold, twenty bucks here or there is hardly worth mentioning, such is the woeful state of the world’s leading fiat money.
Of course, markets don’t demand fiat currencies. Free individuals don’t wake up one day and say to themselves, “Gee… Wouldn’t it be nice if we had an unquestionable, unaccountable, centrally controlled monopoly on counterfeiting to help debase our medium of exchange, saddle the populace with that most insidious of all taxes – inflation – and to sell our kiddies future down the drain? I know, let’s create a Federal Reserve!”
Such institutions don’t come about “naturally.” They require political pull and the gun-for-rent that is the government. They take cover behind rooking legalese, as is found in “The Federal Reserve Act of 1913,” and the absurd prevarications of its “dual mandate,” which is, at present, sold to the terminally credulous public under the noble-sounding, though entirely erroneous mission statement of “price stability and maximum employment.”
Anyone with a basic, non-Ivy League-approved understanding of economics knows this to be a ridiculous goal in the first place. For one, gold takes care of price stability itself. Has done for thousands of years. Price instability is the direct result of fiat monies and manipulation of the money supply by self-serving central banking cartels. From tulipmania to techmania, one can find, at the rotten heart of every inflationary crisis, a central banker with an equally rotten brain and/or heart.

As for the “fetish of full employment,” as Henry Hazlitt so eloquently explains in his classic,Economics in One Lesson:
“The progress of civilization has meant the reduction of employment, not its increase. It is because we have become increasingly wealthy as a nation that we have been able virtually to eliminate child labor, to remove the necessity of work for many of the aged and to make it [financially] unnecessary for millions of women to take jobs.
“The real question,” continued Hazlitt, writing in 1946, “is not how many millions of jobs there will be in America ten years from now, but how much shall we produce, and what, in consequence, will be our standard of living?”
The Fed is the work of Woodrow…a creature of Congress. As George F. Will, writing in The Post, once put it, mission creep is part of the “metabolic urge” of government agencies. The Fed is no different. It is an Ouroboros running out of tail on which to feed. There’s nothing free market about this beast, Fellow Reckoner…and nothing free market about the economy that stands on its sunken shoulders.
Without space for competing currencies, the invisible hand is bound and cuffed, unable to feel around in the dark, to set reliable prices. Value is distorted, malinvestment promoted.
In the end, you get unpredictable stock market volatility and a dollar shaved to within 1/1,500th of its life. Exactly what you’d expect, in other words.
The solution? Here, a modest suggestion:
End…The…Fed.
Instead, allow competing banks to issue competing currencies. Allow the fundamental underpinning of an economy – it’s medium of exchange – to discover its own “fair value.” Witness competition weed out banks that lend imprudently and that rip off customers, to the favor of those operating with prudence and fiscal integrity. Watch institutions that choose to issue baseless, paper money go bust without federal bailout funds and those that adhere – freely, without let or hindrance – to a gold standard garner the public trust their thrift and judiciousness earns them.
Wishful thinking, you say? Well, until such a time comes to pass, here’s another suggestion, courtesy of our Reckoner-in-Chief, Bill Bonner:
“Buy gold. Be happy.”
 
Gold is Money explained.

VIDEO: Jim Turk explains that gold is money, not an investment. Investments are used to create wealth by producing products or services. Money doesn't create anything. Its role merely is to maintain purchasing power while waiting to spend it. When people hold national currencies as money and those currencies lose purchasing power, they lose their wealth. When they hold gold as money, they maintain their wealth. GoldMoney 2011 Jun 7



from http://www.realityzone.com/currentperiod.html
 
Maybe you should combine your three threads (or four I just saw another) or more into one since you post the exact same thing in each of them. Or just keep reposting on one.


Duplicate count is now up to six.
 
Last edited:
Ron Paul on CNBC's Kudlow Report ~7/13/11
"I think you have to have something better than pieces of paper that Federal Reserve Prints at will."

 
Murray N. Rothbard said:

...
"The power to counterfeit is the power to abuse. It is not enough to urge the government to use it more moderately. The power must be taken away. Counterfeiting is fraud, and no one should have the right to counterfeit, least of all the government, whose record of counterfeiting throughout history is black indeed. Money and banking must be separated from the State, just as Church and State are separated in the American tradition, just as the economy and the State should be separated.

Vital to this necessary reform is the return to a money which is a useful product produced by the free market itself. In every society, people on the market voluntarily arrive at one or two commodities which are the most useful to use as money. For thousands of years, gold has been selected by countless societies as that money. The only alternative to a market commodity-money is what we unfortunately have now: paper tickets issued by the government and called "money." Since the paper tickets – dollars, francs, pounds sterling, or what have you – are issued by the government, the government can issue any amount it arbitrarily chooses. Counterfeiting is built into the system, and hence so is inflation and eventual destruction of the currency.

The only genuine solution to the evil of inflation, then, is to separate money from the State, to make money once again a market commodity instead of a fiat ticket issued by the central government. The dollar must once again be what it was originally until it was, in effect, nationalized. The dollar must once again be simply a name for a unit of weight of gold coin. Only this kind of fundamental reform will cure the ravages of inflation. ... Ron Paul is one of the few men in public life who truly understands the problem and is willing to fight to cure it..."

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard187.html
Rothbard rocks!!!
 
What do you think about the constitutionality of Ron's competing currencies bill? A Huffpost blogger says it is unconstitutional because congress alone is allowed to coin money and nobody else. Ron's bill as I read it mentioned repealing other items and I assume this is where the blogger's objection lay? I didn't know where to find these items in your code to see exactly what his objection was.Has anybody looked at Ron's bill and have an opinion?

EDIT: Just looking on Youtube it seems to be his introduction of private mints?However,the constitution does recognise the existence of foreign money just as it allows congress to set the value thereof.So obviously US money is specifically that coined by the congress but other money is admitted to exist.The difference is in the symbols stamped into the gold/silver.I don't see any prohibition on private minting of tokens from bullion,only on such tokens being described as 'US money'.Therefore there is no prohibition on trade in such tokens as long as there is no misrepresentation of their nature.
 
Last edited:
The Constitution says a couple of things. One of them is that the States will pay no bills or issue certificates of credit in NOTHING BUT Gold and Silver, or something like that. It does also say Congress has the power to Coin and Regulate the Value Of ... Currency. What it doesnt say is what the People will be required to use as Currency. Thats where Legal Tender laws rear their ugly heads, and essencially Legalize Counterfeitting and Prohibit Competing Currencies. The Huffpo Blogger isnt thinking like a founding father. So, lets think like a founding father. A founding father would grant the Federal Government very specific powers, and every other power is completely prohibited. The founding fathers also wrote the Constitution to protect the People from the Government, so they wouldnt have written in clauses that would have enslaved us to the bank knowingly or willingly. Our current congress either purposefully misinterprets the Constitution to suit its own dark purposes, or they just ignore the parts they dont like. Much like a cop that feels like running red lights on their coffee breaks.

To answer your other question, I havent read Ron's bill.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your question.

What do you think about the constitutionality of Ron's competing currencies bill? A Huffpost blogger says it is unconstitutional because congress alone is allowed to coin money and nobody else. Ron's bill as I read it mentioned repealing other items and I assume this is where the blogger's objection lay? I didn't know where to find these items in your code to see exactly what his objection was.

Competing currencies are perfectly constitutional because the restrictions in the Constitution on coinage apply only to State and Federal governments, not to private citizens.

EDIT: Just looking on Youtube it seems to be his introduction of private mints?However,the constitution does recognise the existence of foreign money just as it allows congress to set the value thereof.So obviously US money is specifically that coined by the congress but other money is admitted to exist.The difference is in the symbols stamped into the gold/silver.I don't see any prohibition on private minting of tokens from bullion,only on such tokens being described as 'US money'.Therefore there is no prohibition on trade in such tokens as long as there is no misrepresentation of their nature.

The prohibition is in the tax code. Current law imposes capital gain and sales taxes upon any bullion or barter transaction. This prevents alternative monetary systems from arising. It is like going to the bank to change a $5 bill into quarters and paying sales tax on the transaction.

My amendment forbids the government taxing the medium of exchange and removes this (immoral) road block to competing currencies.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top