Hillary Plans Speech Against the Alt Right

No, but the newcomers certainly don't. That's for certain. Whites suck on the liberty meter, but the newcomers are worse. The newcomers make the Caucasian Boobus look like Frederic Bastiat.

What if the newcomers were white? Would it change the situation any?
 
No, but the newcomers certainly don't. That's for certain. Whites suck on the liberty meter, but the newcomers are worse. The newcomers make the Caucasian Boobus look like Frederic Bastiat.

Exactly! There is a cultural difference that doesn't even need a racial explanation, though that might be involved as well. Regardless, it doesn't matter, cause liberty will NEVER take hold in this nation if the demographic balance continues to be destabilized.
 
What if the newcomers were white? Would it change the situation any?

Probably not. Most of the world has been infected with a serious strain of statism. Even the folks in New Zealand and Australia have been gradually beaten down. The Aussies had their firearms deceptively stolen and did nothing. I wouldn't approve the immigration of a hundred thousand Aussies over here.

Americans are basically on our own, fighting these villains. Sure, there are pockets of resistance littered around, but it's not massed like here in the US.
 
Last edited:
Exactly! There is a cultural difference that doesn't even need a racial explanation, though that might be involved as well. Regardless, it doesn't matter, cause liberty will NEVER take hold in this nation if the demographic balance continues to be destabilized.

What would you consider a stable demographic balance?
 
If the Alt Right would abandon the 'whites only' mentality that is foremost in their rhetoric


What would they have left?

The alt-right fundamentally developed from a core of disaffected failures who gathered on the internet to collectively blame others for their personal misfortune. Without the 'other' upon which to heap all of the blame for the problems in their lives, they have no common ideology.
 
What would you consider a stable demographic balance?

The current one, minus a significant percentage of illegal aliens from Mexico, Central and South America.

Why is it ok to replace the White population, when population replacement in any other nation would be considered genocide?
 
What would they have left?

The alt-right fundamentally developed from a core of disaffected failures who gathered on the internet to collectively blame others for their personal misfortune. Without the 'other' upon which to heap all of the blame for the problems in their lives, they have no common ideology.


In which part of the nation do you live? Have you ever had the joy of living in the inner city, of teaching there? Of living near the inner city and dealing with thugs and even women willing to beat up old ladies in Wal Mart parking lots for a little loot? Have you ever had your neighborhood demographic change almost over night and find that your neighborhood crime and vandalism rate has shot up? Have you seen your schools go down the toilet after being inundated with third world illegal immigrants or bussed in students? As a person from the South who has lived in California and the South, I have seen all these things. The Jeb! types have not. Thus, their complete cluelessness about the need for the alt right.
 
Last edited:
And so it begins..................







 
Last edited:
If the Alt Right would abandon the 'whites only' mentality that is foremost in their rhetoric, people would take them more seriously. There is nothing wrong with nationalism, per se, but white nationalism is just stupid.

This is really an overblown issue, and if you think about it's easy to see why. Immigrants come to this country for the express purpose of living in a majority white nation. They more than anybody know what a non-white country looks like and has a much incentive as anyone to ensure that the US remains white. Rhetoric which suggests legal immigrants of color need to be expelled is certainly problematic, but few in the alt-right go that far. The basic idea that immigration policy should be reset to ensure a continued white majority would be welcome by pretty much everyone and wouldn't be controversial among immigrants at all since such ethnocentric policies are the norm in the places they are coming from. China would never allow China to become anything other than overwhelmingly majority Han Chinese.
 
This is really an overblown issue, and if you think about it's easy to see why. Immigrants come to this country for the express purpose of living in a majority white nation. They more than anybody know what a non-white country looks like and has a much incentive as anyone to ensure that the US remains white. Rhetoric which suggests legal immigrants of color need to be expelled is certainly problematic, but few in the alt-right go that far. The basic idea that immigration policy should be reset to ensure a continued white majority would be welcome by pretty much everyone and wouldn't be controversial among immigrants at all since such ethnocentric policies are the norm in the places they are coming from. China would never allow China to become anything other than overwhelmingly majority Han Chinese.

This is true. When my parents came here they were like Americans know their shit, we need to be like them. Then I grow up and morons in US are like we need to respect crazy shit like burqinis and BLM racists. Noooope you can go f your self.
 
You are delusional if you think Jeb! or Little Marco could have drummed up enough support to defeat Hillary. If Trump hadn't sabotaged his own campaign this summer, he would be destroying her in the polls.

The fact is that, in head to head match-ups against Hillary, Bush and Rubio both polled much better than Trump.

Rubio consistently beat her. Bush was about tied. Trump consistently lost (as he's continues to do in virtually all polls since the convention).
 
The fact is that, in head to head match-ups against Hillary, Bush and Rubio both polled much better than Trump.

Rubio consistently beat her. Bush was about tied. Trump consistently lost, badly (as he's continues to do in virtually all polls since the convention).

Correct. But would have there been any real excitement for a Rubio candidacy? I don't know how he would have sustained it.

Is there a tangible risk of running someone like Trump? Absolutely. However, the potential payoff is far more lucrative. If Trump wins, no longer will aspiring politicians have to get on bended knee to the likes of the Weekly Standard or National Review.
 
Last edited:
Correct. But would have there been any real excitement for a Rubio candidacy? I don't know how he would have sustained it.

When your opponent is Hillary Clinton, you don't need to excite people, you just need to be hated less than she is.

...which is easy to do.

...unless you're Donald Trump.
 
' a man who runs with dark conspiracy theories shouldn't be the CiC'

Oh this is going to be great.
 
Ok. Hill is on, finally.
 
' a man who runs with dark conspiracy theories shouldn't be the CiC'

Oh this is going to be great.

You realize his campaign has retooled to compete for the sane vote since last week?
 
Hillary says that the black community is doing great.
 
Trump is reinforcing 'harmful' stereotypes.
 
Now she's citing Maya Angelou.
 
Back
Top