Hillary attacks Alex Jones during speech
- Thread starter jct74
- Start date
anaconda
Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2007
- Messages
- 19,403
Jones is way too high profile to be assassinated. That ship sailed about 5 years ago.
luctor-et-emergo
Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2012
- Messages
- 7,420
Can you imagine all the different conspiracy theories that would start ?
angelatc
Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2007
- Messages
- 50,703
Early voting - lots of places will allow voting to begin in September. I don't think he has time to turn it around.
Alex Jones does nothing but spout lie after lie, but who really has the time to critique hundreds of hours of his lies? I don't have that time, but I'll critique one of his videos here as an example:
Anyone with a basic knowledge of Litvinenko's death would know that both Jones and Wayne Madsen are lying and lying by omission (the same thing that Daniel McAdams does so well as well, and really a long cast of dictator worshiping characters like Justin Raimondo, Lew Rockwell, etc). So the both of them are discussing, or really lying rather, about the circumstances surrounding Litvinenko's death, and Jones happens to bring up pedophilia among British elites as a random talking point to illustrate how corrupt British elites are yet making no reference of it to Putin when it was key to understanding the circumstances of Litvinenko's death. Jones claims to have read the British report on Litvinenko's death but three pages was spent on Litvinenko's allegation that Putin was a pedophile (Litivenko also accused Putin of being involved in the 2005 London Bombings and 1999 Moscow bombings), and before leading the FSB was caught on camera having sex with young boys in a room known to capture footage of other sex scandals involving other Kremlin officials (when Putin led the FSB he had the video destroyed). The final straw that led to Litvinenko's death, as Litivenko himself believed on his death bed, and from polonium poisoning of all things, was this accusation. Supposedly Alex Jones knows the full facts of the case, facts of which, like the pedophile allegation, were available for a decade after Litivenko's death and now reiterated by a report he supposedly read. Jones did not mention this fact at all (he could choose not to believe in it, but at least he could mention it, right?) and has the gall to warn people about pedophiles (he's dedicated hours to it even!, of course such a thing to him only exists among Western elites and "globalists", and not dictators that he shills for). SO WHAT JONES ENDS UP DOING IS BLATANTLY COVERING UP A PEDOPHILE ALLEGATION AGAINST PUTIN WHEN HE HAD JUST FAULTED OTHERS FOR COVERING UP FOR PEDOPHILES! This, and a long list of things he has already stated, just indicates that the man is evil (and a traitor and whatever else).
The 6 minute video could be dissected far better than I just did (Jones doesn't even know his facts about Pearl Harbor as he mentions carriers being destroyed), and it's just a slew of bad facts after bad facts from both Jones and Wayne Madsen.
Anyone with a basic knowledge of Litvinenko's death would know that both Jones and Wayne Madsen are lying and lying by omission (the same thing that Daniel McAdams does so well as well, and really a long cast of dictator worshiping characters like Justin Raimondo, Lew Rockwell, etc). So the both of them are discussing, or really lying rather, about the circumstances surrounding Litvinenko's death, and Jones happens to bring up pedophilia among British elites as a random talking point to illustrate how corrupt British elites are yet making no reference of it to Putin when it was key to understanding the circumstances of Litvinenko's death. Jones claims to have read the British report on Litvinenko's death but three pages was spent on Litvinenko's allegation that Putin was a pedophile (Litivenko also accused Putin of being involved in the 2005 London Bombings and 1999 Moscow bombings), and before leading the FSB was caught on camera having sex with young boys in a room known to capture footage of other sex scandals involving other Kremlin officials (when Putin led the FSB he had the video destroyed). The final straw that led to Litvinenko's death, as Litivenko himself believed on his death bed, and from polonium poisoning of all things, was this accusation. Supposedly Alex Jones knows the full facts of the case, facts of which, like the pedophile allegation, were available for a decade after Litivenko's death and now reiterated by a report he supposedly read. Jones did not mention this fact at all (he could choose not to believe in it, but at least he could mention it, right?) and has the gall to warn people about pedophiles (he's dedicated hours to it even!, of course such a thing to him only exists among Western elites and "globalists", and not dictators that he shills for). SO WHAT JONES ENDS UP DOING IS BLATANTLY COVERING UP A PEDOPHILE ALLEGATION AGAINST PUTIN WHEN HE HAD JUST FAULTED OTHERS FOR COVERING UP FOR PEDOPHILES! This, and a long list of things he has already stated, just indicates that the man is evil (and a traitor and whatever else).
The 6 minute video could be dissected far better than I just did (Jones doesn't even know his facts about Pearl Harbor as he mentions carriers being destroyed), and it's just a slew of bad facts after bad facts from both Jones and Wayne Madsen.
Litivenko's accusation was made watching Putin kissing a boy's stomach: .
Despite having much plastic surgery and Botox now, Putin is often stereotyped as having a stern, serious look about him, but I have noticed that in videos and pictures of him where young children are also around him, especially young boys, his face does light up...
Wherever this video is shown or allegations of Putin being a pedophile is made, his defenders are quite fun to read (but will they defend him here when I'm bringing up such allegations now?). The nature of their defense has a similar nature to some of the posting that goes on here as well... What better way to blow ones cover as a Russian operative when you must defend Putin, right? After being brainwashed by Russian propaganda for so long, and without ever knowing it, the average non-Russian here does not possess the capacity to really criticize Putin, but when it does happen, can you Russian operatives be able to bite your tongue and control yourselves?
Despite having much plastic surgery and Botox now, Putin is often stereotyped as having a stern, serious look about him, but I have noticed that in videos and pictures of him where young children are also around him, especially young boys, his face does light up...
Wherever this video is shown or allegations of Putin being a pedophile is made, his defenders are quite fun to read (but will they defend him here when I'm bringing up such allegations now?). The nature of their defense has a similar nature to some of the posting that goes on here as well... What better way to blow ones cover as a Russian operative when you must defend Putin, right? After being brainwashed by Russian propaganda for so long, and without ever knowing it, the average non-Russian here does not possess the capacity to really criticize Putin, but when it does happen, can you Russian operatives be able to bite your tongue and control yourselves?
dannno
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2007
- Messages
- 65,717
How was Bilderberg this year?
Chieppa1
Member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2009
- Messages
- 2,046
I guess this forum still understates Alex Jones' influence on the internet. He's absolutely dramatic, but he knows every skeleton in Hillary's closet and is not afraid to talk, show and prove them publicly. The ability to share media with people is evening out the MSM spin.
Too be honest, if you look at the world as it is, Jones gets less crazy and the "mainstream" has entered an area of mental illness. Just watch a Youtube of a Trump/Anti-Trump rally.
Too be honest, if you look at the world as it is, Jones gets less crazy and the "mainstream" has entered an area of mental illness. Just watch a Youtube of a Trump/Anti-Trump rally.
PursuePeace
Member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2011
- Messages
- 2,493
"... or how dark their heart must be.."
interesting body language there.
interesting body language there.
AuH20
Account Restricted. Admin to review account standing
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 28,739
Jones acts like a clown on occasion, but he has been vindicated on multiple fronts. From OKC (see Noble Lie) to 911 (see the Congressional Inquiry's 28 pages), he's been right on the trail of these criminals when it wasn't popular to do so.
AuH20
Account Restricted. Admin to review account standing
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 28,739
Jones possesses an almost encyclopedic knowledge of these various scandals. Who? Where? When? Why? Documented facts just fly out of his mouth without much effort.
In your circle maybe. The average person has no idea who he is. The Clintons have killed better known people than AJ already.
This was a stupid move on the Clintons part. They can do nothing, say nothing till november and just move right back into the white house. I can't image why they engaged a d list tv host.
nikcers
Member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2015
- Messages
- 14,408
This is part of how Clintons are going to take over places like Texas. Hillary gets to pidgin hole the Republican party into what liberals think Alex Jones represents. Everyone that defends Alex Jones looks like a nut job, even Trump realized this.
CPUd
Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2012
- Messages
- 22,978
Jacob Soboroff @ jacobsoboroff 4h4 hours ago
I met these IA GOP voters in January & they caucused Paul & Rubio. Now they're for Clinton. #UpForGrabsMSNBC #inners
I met these IA GOP voters in January & they caucused Paul & Rubio. Now they're for Clinton. #UpForGrabsMSNBC #inners
https://twitter.com/jacobsoboroff/status/769358937699262464
undergroundrr
Member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2007
- Messages
- 3,334
This is a win for Hillary. What the progressive establishment does to manipulate the populace is absolutely scientific. This has been timed to the nanosecond and delivered with precision. Divide the people surgically. Control the narrative. At the end of the equation, democrats have the big tent. The DNC is running a high-tech campaign and trump is just a piece in the game, always has been.
The liberty movement has, by design, been tightly conjoined to trump and his campaign in the popular consciousness. Associating trump to Alex Jones, the most prominent media voice for "liberty" is strategically sound.
Liberty = coarseness. Liberty = science averse/lowbrow. Liberty = deportation. Liberty = religious suppression. Liberty = bomb the shit out of 'em (pro-aggression). Liberty = absurd, laughable. Liberty = teen-age lingo. Liberty = red-faced screaming. Liberty = self-absorption. Liberty = insensitive to the disadvantaged.
Meanwhile, perception of progressives = inclusion, compassion, thoughtfulness, enlightenment, diversity, intelligence, self control, service, graciousness, sensitivity, decency, non-aggression.
Nothing in that second list is contradictory to libertarianism or inherent to progressives. Today's breed of "liberty lovers," which is very different in nature than it was just 4 years ago, is triggered (heh) when you say words like "sensitivity," "compassion," "diversity." It HUURRRTS ussss! It BURRNNzzz. They have seemingly been convinced by Hillary and Barack that being sensitive, compassionate, and respectful of diversity makes one a progressive. I ask people here - wouldn't liberty be more viable and attractive if it reflected that second list instead of the first? Until it does, oppressive elites will continue to win. Libertarians will continue to be perceived as intolerable assholes.
Hillary's message here will probably grow Alex Jones' audience, which will still be too miniscule to make a significant impact in government. Her message will fire up trump's supporters, who will remain too small in number to prevent a Clinton landslide.
The liberty movement has, by design, been tightly conjoined to trump and his campaign in the popular consciousness. Associating trump to Alex Jones, the most prominent media voice for "liberty" is strategically sound.
Liberty = coarseness. Liberty = science averse/lowbrow. Liberty = deportation. Liberty = religious suppression. Liberty = bomb the shit out of 'em (pro-aggression). Liberty = absurd, laughable. Liberty = teen-age lingo. Liberty = red-faced screaming. Liberty = self-absorption. Liberty = insensitive to the disadvantaged.
Meanwhile, perception of progressives = inclusion, compassion, thoughtfulness, enlightenment, diversity, intelligence, self control, service, graciousness, sensitivity, decency, non-aggression.
Nothing in that second list is contradictory to libertarianism or inherent to progressives. Today's breed of "liberty lovers," which is very different in nature than it was just 4 years ago, is triggered (heh) when you say words like "sensitivity," "compassion," "diversity." It HUURRRTS ussss! It BURRNNzzz. They have seemingly been convinced by Hillary and Barack that being sensitive, compassionate, and respectful of diversity makes one a progressive. I ask people here - wouldn't liberty be more viable and attractive if it reflected that second list instead of the first? Until it does, oppressive elites will continue to win. Libertarians will continue to be perceived as intolerable assholes.
Hillary's message here will probably grow Alex Jones' audience, which will still be too miniscule to make a significant impact in government. Her message will fire up trump's supporters, who will remain too small in number to prevent a Clinton landslide.
Similar threads
