Hilarious exchange - Indian news host mixes up Daniel McAdams and Ukrainian

Invisible Man

Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2019
Messages
4,363
Rahul Shivshankar, editor-in-chief at Times Now, invited two guests – Daniel McAdams, executive director of the Ron Paul Institute, and Bohdan Nahaylo, chief editor of Kyiv Post – on the show to discuss the ongoing war in Ukraine.

But the discussion turned to a fiery debate between the presenter asked the wrong guest to take a "chill pill".

Video shared online sees Mr Shivshankar addressing Bohdan Nahaylo as "Mr McAdams" and throwing a series of insults going so far as to blame him and “his people” for colonising the East.

He is heard shouting: "Mr McAdams, no hang on, hang on, if you are so concerned about Ukrainians get off the fence and put boots on the ground.

"Don’t lecture us here in India ok? I am not going to hear your lecture."

But the statement is intended for Mr Nahaylo, who has been talking non-stop the whole time, while Mr McAdams remains silent, looking confused.

Mr McAdams then cuts in and says: "I'm not talking! It's the other guy who has been talking, I haven't been able to say a word!

"Dear host, I have not said a word yet. I don't know why you're yelling at me."

The anchor stands on his ground and tries to correct him, saying: "I'm not yelling at you, I'm talking to Mr McAdams. The man has gone completely ballistic."

The executive director erupts and shouts: "I am Mr McAdams! I am Mr McAdams! I am Mr McAdams and I haven't even said a word!"

Video at link:
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/news-anchor-gets-trolled-after-26376454
 
The clown show is worldwide. Nice of them to demonstrate yet again that they're everything they accuse us of being.
 
Understandable mistake by the host. Watch the video. Whoever was producing the show reversed the labels on the guests. The host was probably looking at the labels on the screen.
 
Understandable mistake by the host. Watch the video. Whoever was producing the show reversed the labels on the guests. The host was probably looking at the labels on the screen.

That's true. But he also apparently went into the segment with no clue about who he was interviewing and what perspectives they were supposed to be there to represent.
 
That's true. But he also apparently went into the segment with no clue about who he was interviewing and what perspectives they were supposed to be there to represent.

May be the best way for an interview to be done...
 
Back
Top