"hi-value" sniping targets are not found in rural areas.

[oyarde]

OP was pretty odd and definitely out of place on this forum, imo. Smells like beginnings of an entrapment setup.

I have personally seen a snipe before, while on a bird count. It was an unusual find, because it was near Christmas time in Ohio and normally the bird would be elsewhere then. Find was verified by several experienced birders.

There we go , much tastier than a killdeer . I skin them like a quail , grouse or woodcock , whip an egg up in milk , dip them , flour them , salt and pepper it , sear it brown in hot butter , both sides , add some liquid , turn the heat down cook it slowly in the gravy , make some mashed potatoes , green beans or corn , you are set , tasty.

 

[Athan]

If the point of this forum is not to discuss armed resistance to potential future tyranny, then this forum has nothing to do with the Second Amendment, and those words should be removed from the forum description.

You need to realize all you said is void because THIS statement that I quoted is completely incorrect. Any "real discussion" you are trying have and to bring up is out of place here. I discuss all sorts of manner of subjects in local associations and with friends perhaps even some that may float you and the OP's fancy. I am smart enough not to bring it here. You know why? Because this is a forum supportive of a presidential campaign dedicated to a peaceful movement. Don't believe me? LOOK AT THE NAME OF THE FORUMS.

 

[Pericles]

You need to realize all you said is void because THIS statement that I quoted is completely incorrect. Any "real discussion" you are trying have and to bring up is out of place here. I discuss all sorts of manner of subjects in local associations and with friends perhaps even some that may float you and the OP's fancy. I am smart enough not to bring it here. You know why? Because this is a forum supportive of a presidential campaign dedicated to a peaceful movement. Don't believe me? LOOK AT THE NAME OF THE FORUMS.

What meaning should I ascribe to a member of this site that uses a Republic of the Rio Grande flag as his avatar?

If one looks for a sinister meaning, one can usually find one.

 

[Revolution9]

Although I saw little value in his post, he said nothing remotely capable of getting him put in prison under current laws. (Granted, the government can and does break the law as it sees fit.)

What I find disturbing is your apparently flippant attitude toward the idea of someone being thrown in prison for speech, not to mention raped. Would you be cheering for the feds if they busted that guy? Whose side are you on in the struggle for freedom?

Interesting sig file. I suggest you stop being fascinated with death and get a frikkin' sense of irony, sarcasm and wit comprehension going on in your LIFE.

Rev9

 

[Athan]

What meaning should I ascribe to a member of this site that uses a Republic of the Rio Grande flag as his avatar.

One BADASS Tejano.

 

[alucard13mmfmj]

 

[Pericles]

http://www.badassoftheweek.com/

One BADASS Tejano.

http://www.badassoftheweek.com/zaragoza.html?

 

[AuH20]

I don't see any problems with this thread. Theoretically, if you're going to topple an organization you will make a concerted effort to cut off the head of the snake. This type of distasteful stuff is mentioned in many a CIA manual.

 

[Athan]

I'll tell you what Pericles, because your not just some random user. Let me PM an idea that has been floating around in my parts as a result of the abuse Ron Paul delegate have had to endure. Hopefully you'll be less worried about defending the OP once you read it.

Ok I PM'd it to you, but since I didn't correctly preview it the first time I sent a more readible revised version.

 

[Athan]

By the way, mods should really lock this thread.

 

[Pericles]

I'll tell you what Pericles, because your not just some random user. Let me PM an idea that has been floating around in my parts as a result of the abuse Ron Paul delegate have had to endure. Hopefully you'll be less worried about defending the OP once you read it.

Ok I PM'd it to you, but since I didn't correctly preview it the first time I sent a more readible revised version.

Thanks for the message. I agree with the sentiments expressed, but with this reservation; The OP of the thread was inarticulate, and the type of loose cannon that will do more harm than good to the image, but liberty means that they are on the playing field, too.

 

[Pericles]

I don't see any problems with this thread. Theoretically, if you're going to topple an organization you will make a concerted effort to cut off the head of the snake. This type of distasteful stuff is mentioned in many a CIA manual.

I'd say where this is really going is the concept of "Is insurrection permitted under certain circumstances, which is the real purpose of the 2A?"

The first point is based on the founders experience in the Revolution, what did they expect to be the ultimate guarantee of liberty? The fact that as long as elections were held, liberty was present, therefore, as long as elections are held, no tyranny is present, and there is no right of insurrection. The counter would be that the BoR enshrines the means of insurrection whenever the body of the people, in the form of the militias, demand it. Having just gained independence, by the closest of margins, the founders wanted to ensure that the people had the means to resist any government they found "That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."

The federal Congress is limited in its uses of the militia, "to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; ". The states have no such restrictions on their use of the militias. In fact, based on the War of 1812, because 4 states refused to call out their militias to support the war, and the size of the regular Army was too small to fight foreign wars, the National Guard was created to evade these restrictions by being a reserve of the Army, rather than a form of militia organization.

We currently have the problem of how to contain government power when the political system works to thwart the will of a substantial number of the citizens, and the states have no organized militias to enforce their nullification powers.

 

[pcosmar]

Thanks for the message. I agree with the sentiments expressed, but with this reservation; The OP of the thread was inarticulate, and the type of loose cannon that will do more harm than good to the image, but liberty means that they are on the playing field, too.

The OP was a Mall Ninja at best,, a provocateur more likely.

And he was rightly banned,, but I would have asked one thing to confirm.

Define "High Value" target.

 

[alucard13mmfmj]

aim for high rank and work your way down?

 

[DerailingDaTrain]

I think this thread should be deleted. Even discussing this kind of stuff hypothetically isn't a good idea.

 

[DerailingDaTrain]

Although I saw little value in his post, he said nothing remotely capable of getting him put in prison under current laws. (Granted, the government can and does break the law as it sees fit.)


What I find disturbing is your apparently flippant attitude toward the idea of someone being thrown in prison for speech, not to mention raped. Would you be cheering for the feds if they busted that guy? Whose side are you on in the struggle for freedom?

You must be mentally challenged. You can and certainly will go to prison for advocating the murder of high value military targets even if you are just typing about it on the internet and if you don't see that's what his post is advocating then you must also be blind.

killing lots of grunts means nothing. hathcock and the snipers he trained killed about 1000 commies in Nam, so what? We still lost. To get to the big boys, you have to be able to disassemble your silenced auto rifle, get into position, and hit the target's bodyguards after you hit your main target, as he moves between vehicle and buildings, etc. That is 200 yd shooting, at most. Often, it will be 50 yds and less, so subsonic ammo suffices, with head shots obviating the concealed armor issue.

Which side am I on? The one that's far away from crazies like the OP. Associating with such people will get you a one way ticket to gitmo. Why do you think he was instantly banned?

 

[Pericles]

The OP was a Mall Ninja at best,, a provocateur more likely.

And he was rightly banned,, but I would have asked one thing to confirm.

Define "High Value" target.

They're always around. I'd guess the informants are always the ones who want to get the lead flying at the earliest opportunity.

 

[DerailingDaTrain]

The OP was a Mall Ninja at best,, a provocateur more likely.

And he was rightly banned,, but I would have asked one thing to confirm.

Define "High Value" target.

I had no idea what a mall ninja was but I looked it up. I have never laughed so much in my life and the OP fits the label perfectly.

 

[oyarde]

The OP was a Mall Ninja at best,, a provocateur more likely.

And he was rightly banned,, but I would have asked one thing to confirm.

Define "High Value" target.

That part made no sense to me as well.

 

[DerailingDaTrain]

That part made no sense to me as well.

Come on...you know what he meant. Think about it