Harvard Professor Trashes Keynes For Homosexuality

I had a globalization course in which we read Niall Ferguson as opposed to others we read (Marxists.) He was suppose to represent the conservative and neo-liberal position, haha. He's an interventionist and if he were a politician he would be a neo-conservative corporatist (or Britain's equivalent.)
 
I have no idea why he's allowed to comment on economics, and finance in particular. He's a HISTORIAN, and generally doesn't have a clue what he's talking about.
 
I think that elite weirdo aristocrats have always had a penchant for being fruity behind the scenes. It's not politically correct to say that, but I think it's the truth nonetheless. Of course there is no shortage of run of the mill non-elite closet fruits as well, but I digress...
 
Petar said:
I think that elite weirdo aristocrats have always had a penchant for being fruity behind the scenes. It's not politically correct to say that, but I think it's the truth nonetheless. Of course there is no shortage of run of the mill non-elite closet fruits as well, but I digress...
Click to expand...

I agree. There has always been what seems like a connection between elitism and sexual perversion.
 
bbjaylive said:
I have no idea why he's allowed to comment on economics, and finance in particular. He's a HISTORIAN, and generally doesn't have a clue what he's talking about.
Click to expand...

There are some economic historians that are completely solid in economic theory. They can be especially formidable because they can follow and trace the reasons for, and impact of, new and different schools of thought throughout history, see political connections, and bring argument-crushing data to bear in the debate (I suspect Ferguson may not be one of these people). For example, there is a professor at San Jose State University here in the Bay Area (a free market economics department) named Jeffrey Hummel who has his PhD in economic history and he is rock solid in macro theory and monetary theory, and teaches both. These are the kinds of people that I suspect could run circles around Bernanke in congressional hearings.

Take a listen. I think you'll enjoy this:

 
Last edited:
I agree he didn't care about the future, from his statement about inflation that ' in a long time we're all dead', but leave it to a Harvard professor with a theory to publish to pull out the least relevant aspects of Keynes' life to dissect.
 
I have this documentary (accompanies his book) by Ferguson bookmarked to watch:

 
Keynes...what a fag...lol, honestly, don't care about his sexuality. I do care about how his stupid animal spirit crap somehow became the predominant economic theory of this nation.
 
sailingaway said:
I agree he didn't care about the future, from his statement about inflation that ' in a long time we're all dead', but leave it to a Harvard professor with a theory to publish to pull out the least relevant aspects of Keynes' life to dissect.
Click to expand...

I agree , his disdain for the future should be talked about .
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Brian4Liberty
Ron Paul Institute (RPI) for Peace and Prosperity Conference 2024
Replies
7
Views
8K
Brian4Liberty
Brian4Liberty
Anti Federalist
Duke U prof wants $14 trillion in reparations payments
Replies
2
Views
385
AngryCanadian
A
susano
An account of comedy writer who got cancelled for being "gender critical"
Replies
0
Views
303
susano
susano
C
Conservatives and the Free Trade Straw Man
13 14 15
Replies
294
Views
18K
TheTexan
TheTexan
Occam's Banana
Salon on "right-wing fake history"
Replies
3
Views
995
Anti Globalist
Anti Globalist
Back
Top