Hardest evidence of HUGE FRAUD, what I have found

[JanusFIN]

Just watch it!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV6qAGigGYY&eurl

Then you understand, that all another issues are meaningless in this situation right now.

Expose the fraud, and then you have a chance!

 

[sajorojas]

Just watch it!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV6qAGigGYY&eurl

Then you understand, that all another issues are meaningless in this situation right now.

Expose the fraud, and then you have a chance!

I think that the boston globe mistakenly had every column over one. They've already corrected it.

 

[JanusFIN]

I think that the boston globe mistakenly had every column over one. They've already corrected it.

And you are stupid to believe them? Even after what they have done? Yes, they do a mistake showing the real results in beginning, witch they then correct to show as they "should" show.

You people, are you really so blind to see the truth?

 

[jdrochon]

And you are stupid to believe them? Even after what they have done? Yes, they do a mistake showing the real results in beginning, witch they then correct to show as they "should" show.

You people, are you really so blind to see the truth?

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent
revolution inevitable." - John F. Kennedy

 

[sajorojas]

Oh i'm all for any kind of revolution, peaceful or not. I just think that it really was an error. I dont think Ron Paul and McCain actually had each others votes. You really think McCain got 1 and Zero in every district? That was Tom Tancredo. A few morons probably didnt know he dropped out or were really strong supporters

 

[jdrochon]

Oh i'm all for any kind of revolution, peaceful or not. I just think that it really was an error. I dont think Ron Paul and McCain actually had each others votes. You really think McCain got 1 and Zero in every district? That was Tom Tancredo. A few morons probably didnt know he dropped out or were really strong supporters

|HUNTER |MCCAIN |PAUL |ROMNEY |TANCREDO <--- THAT IS THE ORDER on the website. So I don't see how that drastic of an error could have occured. then again if it is real, the big error woudl be the fact they posted it. Unless someone is a whistle blower and hoping somone else would see it.

LOOK, those totals are right in line with the hand counted ballots where Paul got between 10% and 34%.
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=749



Hand Count Shows 15% For Ron Paul


By zooamerica | January 9, 2008
This would have placed Dr. Paul in 3rd place, just as the polls were showing before the primary…
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/23643
The computer counted votes are the problem.
Not a single hand count township showed less than 10%
Supposedly, Ron Paul got 8% - this does not make sense.
richmond is hand count 34% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
lyman is hand count 28.7% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Orange is hand count 25% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Harts location is hand count 25% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
wentworth is hand count 24% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
goshen is hand count 17.68% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
marlow is hand count 16.6% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
cornish is hand count 14.8% for dr. Paul…100% reporting
Rumney is hand count 14.5% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
croydon is hand count 14 % for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
dorchester is hand count 13.89% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
effingham is hand count 13% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
albany is hand count 12.9% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
antrim is hand count 12% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
south hampton is hand count 12% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
sullivan is hand count 12.61% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
troy is hand count 12.21% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
mason is hand count 11.88% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
newport is hand count 11.45% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
charlstown is hand count 11.3% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Allenstown is hand count 11.16% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
bristol is hand count 11% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
warren is hand count 11% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Strafford is hand count 11% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
washington is hand count 11.02% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
lancaster is hand count 10.9% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
springfield is hand count 10.6% for Dr.Paul…100% reporting
wilton is hand count 10.37% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Northfield is hand count 10.3% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
mont vernon is hand count 10.25% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting

 

[austin356]

he keeps saying "even if they were reversed"

Ok lets say the totals are right. Then those totals are statistically impossible since McCain would not be getting 1 or 0 votes.

This guy really does not need to be a data analyst or school teacher. I think he is sincere but also quite dumb.

 

[29ytsejam]

The Globe clearly had the columns off; there's no way Tancredo would win any town. But more importantly, the newspaper's published results, especially at 4am, when they were still counting ballots, are UNOFFICIAL. That's why you see the discrepancies between when he checked it 4am and the next day. This doesn't prove that voter fraud didn't occur, but you're grasping at straws with this one. Forget about this and focus on finding solid evidence of fraud, or even better, helping RP win your own state.

 

[Acheron]

I'm sorry, but this proves nothing. So, the Boston Globe mislabelled the columns. Beating this dead horse simply undermine legitimate claims with better evidence. The issue of voting machines with no accountability and paper trail is a very important one, as is the practice of outsourcing something as vital as the vote. Don't trivialize the topic with overwrought Youtube videos like this one!

 

[JanusFIN]

Cant you see the forest from the threes?

In this video everybody can see the mess behind your voting system. What information is right, whats wrong, its almost impossible to see. And in the final, nobody knows, but those who "count" the votes...

You should have plain, easy and worldwide system, where all the votes can be monitored afterwards, without a doubt from fraud and without your Israeli corporations in the middle of your mess.

Its not difficult: all the votes goes to own paper, and all the paper gets stamp for its official proof. In the voting place there are international and domestic observers from all partys, ( in matter of fact, everybody has a right to be one ) and then incoming peoples amount have to compete with the voting slips and counted votes together.

THATS IT.

If you have to recount, there are all the slips in the baskets waiting for it.