Hannity to ‘Never Trumpers’: If Trump Loses, ‘You Own’ Consequences of Hillary Presidency

[The Rebel Poet]

Really? Who is the candidate saber-rattling with Russia?

Hillary. Trump only saber rattles with brown people.

Who is in favor of third term abortions?

Both of them.

Who was killed more people

I assume Hillary.

and is promising to continue the same foreign policy of interventionism?

Mostly Trump, but both of them.

I get that Trumps is crap. I think he is too! But I think some people are so anti-Trump that they fail to see the horror that Clinton has been and will be.

We know you know Trump is bad; I don't think anyone has said you like Trump (I haven't at any rate). We believe not just that Trump is bad, but that Trump is the same bad as Clinton.

 

[TER]

First off, you really just said we should try eating horse shit. Let that sink in.

lol, I know! What a mess we are in. As of now, the next president will be Hillary or Trump. We're eating shit whether we like it or not! I know what the cow crap is like and what it does. The horse, not so much, but at least some of things I have heard are palatable. At least compared to the cow shit.

Second, I don't know who would pick worse judges. Crap shoot either way, but at least if it's Hillary she might have some opposition from team R. The fact that it was "conservative" justice and Republican Bush appointee Roberts that put the last nail in the healthcare freedom coffin should have prevented anyone from ever making the silly "justice appointees" argument again. Trump said btw that his progressive sister would be a great supreme court nominee, so he's already threatening to screw that up.

Add that to the list of concerns I have if we are served horse crap. There are many concerns. Still, knowing what cow crap does, I'll take my chances.

 

[AuH20]

Hillary. Trump only saber rattles with brown people.

Trump doesn't want to overthrow Assad and HIS BROWN PEOPLE.

 

[TER]

Hillary. Trump only saber rattles with brown people.

He saber rattles against criminals and people who have broken laws to get here and mooch off the citizens.

Both of them.

Now that is concerning. I did not think he was for third term abortions. Do you have a link?

I assume Hillary.

And the killing will multiply if she is given presidential powers.

Mostly Trump, but both of them.

really? Why do you say that?

We know you know Trump is bad; I don't think anyone has said you like Trump (I haven't at any rate). We believe not just that Trump is bad, but that Trump is the same bad as Clinton.

I disagree. I believe Hillary will lead to more death and carnage. Including in America.

 

[The Rebel Poet]

As of now, the next president will be Hillary or Trump. We're eating shit whether we like it or not!

 

[CCTelander]

Or, let's just sit around, pontificate, and cast stones, and accept to eat cow patty, even though we have never tried horse patty before and it might not be as bad.

The next President will appoint Supreme Court judges. Who do you think will pick better judges, Hillary or Trump? That alone is enough reason to vote Trump in order to stop Hillary.

They said the same thing back when Bill Clinton was running for president, well that Clinton probably would wind up appointing Supreme Court Justices anyway. He was elected and did in fact appoint 2 justices (Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer). Did things get worse? Of course. But the sky didn't fall, the Earth didn't explode, and life went on.

This is just flagrant fear mongering. Don't buy into it. Trump won't be any better and may in fact be much worse.

 

[TER]

I hear you, friend. There is a better place. But it is above this world. In the one we are living in now, we are force-fed shit.

 

[CPUd]

They said the same thing back when Bill Clinton was running for president, well that Clinton probably would wind up appointing Supreme Court Justices anyway. He was elected and did in fact appoint 2 justices (Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer). Did things get worse? Of course. But the sky didn't fall, the Earth didn't explode, and life went on.

This is just flagrant fear mongering. Don't buy into it. Trump won't be any better and may in fact be much worse.

The national party has so far spent more on the Senate races than put into the POTUS race. If they can effectively distance themselves from Trump, they still have a realistic chance of holding the Senate, as a check against Clinton nominees.

 

[The Rebel Poet]

He saber rattles against criminals and people who have broken laws to get here and mooch off the citizens.

And Iran.

Now that is concerning. I did not think he was for third term abortions. Do you have a link?

After looking for links, I find that he has switched positions on that one.

And the killing will multiply if she is given presidential powers.

Yup. Disaster if we don't stop her.

really? Why do you say that?

The fact that he has said so and it is one of the areas he has been very consistent on. He said he wants to bomb Iran and take their oil for profit. He said we don't use nuclear weapons enough. There are many things he has said about his globalist plans. Have you been ignoring his statements?

I disagree. I believe Hillary will lead to more death and carnage. Including in America.

We won't know until it's too late. I'd rather work to stop BOTH of them.

 

[RJB]

Enough of the coprophagia. At least wait until Eduardo gets a new sock puppet to join in.

 

[The Rebel Poet]

I hear you, friend. There is a better place. But it is above this world. In the one we are living in now, we are force-fed shit.

You are not being force-fed shit, you are voting to eat it consentually. The fences truly are around your mind.

 

[Ender]

Trump doesn't want to overthrow Assad and HIS BROWN PEOPLE.

No, but he does want to take out Iran and THEIR brown/white/tan/yellow/cream people

 

[TER]

They said the same thing back when Bill Clinton was running for president, well that Clinton probably would wind up appointing Supreme Court Justices anyway. He was elected and did in fact appoint 2 justices (Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer). Did things get worse? Of course. But the sky didn't fall, the Earth didn't explode, and life went on.

This is just flagrant fear mongering. Don't buy into it. Trump won't be any better and may in fact be much worse.

Yeah, well, we have a difference of opinion. I think our lives will be much more at risk if Hillary is elected than Trump. If you think that I am voting because of fear, then you would be damn right. Not for my own worthless life, but for the life of my children.

 

[TER]

And Iran.

Yeah. Clinton is the same. Let's call it even on that point. Both suck with that.

After looking for links, I find that he has switched positions on that one.

Ok, he flip flopped. He's on the right side now. Hopefully he will stay there. With Clinton, fuggetabbouttit!

Yup. Disaster if we don't stop her.

A disaster in a scale which most of us have not seen.

The fact that he has said so and it is one of the areas he has been very consistent on. He said he wants to bomb Iran and take their oil for profit. He said we don't use nuclear weapons enough. There are many things he has said about his globalist plans. Have you been ignoring his statements?

No. Those are my concerns. I don't ignore them. I weigh them against the whole picture.

We won't know until it's too late. I'd rather work to stop BOTH of them.

If you know a way, let me know. Until then, it looks like Trump is the only realistic chance at shaking up and defanging the globalists in their takeover of the world through the central banks and their manipulation of economies. Their agenda is the systematic destruction and elimination of our Sovereignty , and also our civil liberties and the American ideals of freedom.

Yes, I understand he may be playing a part and this is all an act. Well, I'll take my chances than simply accept Hillary as Commander and Chief. With Hillary, NOTHING changes, and we continue to drive towards the cliff. With Trump, maybe there is another chance. Maybe we get a chance later to fix things up.

 

[goldwater's ghost]

No dumb idiots like Hannity own Trumps loss, Trump is going to lose. And it is squarely on Trumps idiotic ideals and his supporters who pushed him to the forefront, despite craploads of evidence that he was by far the weakest republican nominee. The idiots said no no no Trump is the strongest candidate, and we don't need you. Were going to shove this Hitler clone down your throat and force you to take him. Good luck with that.

this a thousand times

 

[PierzStyx]

And we don't know that Trump will do all those horrible things which PierzStyx is predicting, do we?

I'm not predicting anything. He has promised to do them. Is that why you're voting for him, because you don't know what he is about?

As for the dung, I'm sure both tastes disgusting. In this situation we are discussing, one is proven to kill, the other might just make you sick. If my kids have to get sick so they won't die, I'll take it.

Or you could just not eat shit. I mean, seriously. If you truly think voting effects anything, then vote for better candidates. Vote for Gary Johnson. Heck, a vote for Jill Stein is better than a vote for either Hillary or Trump. The choice is between eating shit or not. And you are choosing to eat shit. That makes zero sense.

Responses in bold.

Additionally, explain to me how a "protest vote" exists and does anything other than empower the person you voted for?

 

[CPUd]

Responses in bold.

Additionally, explain to me how a "protest vote" exists and does anything other than empower the person you voted for?

The voters this cycle are generally motivated by fear:
Poll: Fear, not excitement, driving Clinton and Trump supporters

 

[TER]

Responses in bold.

Additionally, explain to me how a "protest vote" exists and does anything other than empower the person you voted for?

I saw your responses. I disagree with you.

From what I now know (which I confess is limited and unreliable compared to what Trump will actually do if elected), I believe above all that stopping Hillary is the most important thing I can do with my vote. My vote for a third party candidate will not help stop Hillary. My vote for Trump might.

As I stated before, if it appears to be a blowout going into election day, I will vote third party (as I have done numerous times in the past). If it is close, I am voting against Hillary by voting for Trump, who I believe is the lesser of two evils.

Does this 'empower" Trump? Well, duh, yes. It empowers him to stop Hillary which is my main priority.

I understand why this is so difficult for some here to understand, as we have been followers of Ron Paul who has put his consistency and integrity to be above all things. Well, I think that can also be a sort of pride. Ron Paul would rather have us throw away our vote for a non winning candidate and in doing so give Hillary a victory so that she can continue the madness and elect SC judges to boot.

Well, that was okay for me to accept in the past, but I think for this election, I have to do a little more than selfishly 'satisfy by conscience' and in doing so have my children wake up in world which is worse off.

The fact is, we are eating shit one way or another since none of the third party candidate are winning this election and the main candidates suck. I will then use the little power I have to pick the less of the two evils, and against the worse evil, for the sake of my children and their future. It's a crappy deal, but it is the only hand I have to play right now. If you think that is foolish and unreasonable or whatever, I really don't care. You do what you want with your vote and I'll do what I want with mine. Thank you.

 

[TER]

The voters this cycle are generally motivated by fear:
Poll: Fear, not excitement, driving Clinton and Trump supporters

I believe you are right. The thought of Hillary as president is quite fearful.

 

[CPUd]

Why do people fear politicians? I've always wondered.