Hannity talked about his encounter with Ron Paul supporters at his hotel last night

Hannity has a warm spot in Hell reserved and he'll never have to worry much about snowballs in his afterlife. Karma.

As to this 2008 political race my pals and I have MEGA amounts of time and effort wrapped up in this revolution and I have a right to say right now that this negative chant stuff needs to get an about face. On ronpauradio a DJ today talked about how violence got our country into the mess we are in now and more violence is NOT the path out. If you disagree I suggest you go straight to the top and talk to corporate and seek Dr Paul's ear and opinion.

I'm 43 years old and have been known to have a potty mouth at times har har.... but the golden rule of thumb is called "time and place". In my hobby with old clasic cars I hang with a lot of older folks and there will be days that go by where I won't hear a single cuss word, and in my day job as a sub teacher in the high schools there are times when but 5 seconds won't pass by where I'll hear a rhapsody of cuss'n ( between class changes har har ). I'm not against curse'n, but you have to look at our country as a whole and have a little understanding. We need the votes of the older folks too.

Was cleaning up the office tonight and found a old book of quotes from the 1920's and someone said "America is a Song... And We Must All Sing it". Translated I think the writer meant we have to have some respect for each other. Hannity deserves no respect... but if we are gonna hold a sign with Dr Paul's name written across it we best show some class; either on or off camera, with proper lighting or not, and always with the Love (and excitement) of the Revolution.... always.
 
I don't get it. Remember a couple days ago before the Iowa caucuses where Hannity actually gave Dr. Paul a fair interview? And now we throw snowballs at him? Geez guys, I agree that Hannity sucks, but no need to be immature and bring Dr. Paul a bad name!
 
ganging up on a guy just trying to get to work

Hannity's "work" is to be the fascist mouthpiece of an evil tyrannical establishment that is guilty of mass murder. He is a Joseph Goebbels. In a just world, people like Hannity would hang.

He better get used to being heckled by angry mobs, because I see a lot more of that happening in Hannity's future.
 
He better get used to being heckled by angry mobs, because I see a lot more of that happening in Hannity's future.


So how can we heckle him.... and at the same time make us, and Ron Paul look like the guys in the white hats ??????????????

Penn and Teller showed us how to point out the fraud in someone like Luntz, then take it to the next level and attach a very powerful "motto" to be yelled out at first sight of said piece of crap. It feels great to say FU Frank. I hope to in my travels in Florida later this year I'll have that wonderous opportuinty... but I promise you I won't be holding a Ron Paul sign nor be in my car which sports a bold Revolution bumper sticker. Or might I with a primal growl in my voice and a smile on my face scream out THANK YOU FRANK. He'll get the point.

What cheer could we jeer with when we bump into the other souless beasts like a Rush or ORiley ??????????????

I'm sorta partial to the chant "SAY YES TO DR. NO". It has that sexy James Bond sound to it ;)
 
Last edited:
Officer: The charge "assault with a deadly snowball."

The Plea: Guilty as charged Your Honor.

The Sentence: Feel somewhat sorry for this butt-hole as his game is exposed.
 
Okay, show him your "wrath" but first put down the Ron Paul for President signs and do it in your own name. I don't care about Hannity (he sucks). I don't even care (very much) about giving them ammunition for calling us "lunatics" and "fringe kooks" but I do care about ruining Ron Paul's chances.
 
I think that's pretty childish and doesn't help anything. We're trying to get people over to our side, which you don't do by acting like an angry mob carrying torches and pitchforks.

I think what we are seeing here is an escalation of how pissed off people are becoming with the economy, civil liberties, and media bias. If this were another country, they would have been firing bullets, not snowballs. This demonstrates a lot of restraint if you ask me.
 
I would support a states right to Tar & Feather. Will donate the feathers from my favorite pillow.... LOL
 
The video was awesome. Hannity, and Fox news in general deserve to live in fear for their crimes. Just like a criminal lives in fear of being caught.

Shouting at and mocking fascists is a great American tradition. It's good to see that tradition being revived.

Honestly, this is actually true - Americans have a long tradition of doing far worse than chasing someone down and tossing a random snowball in their direction.

And, while I have no doubt but that it's absolutely true Dr Paul would never have done such a thing, I'm not so sure he would have been disappointed either.

Freedom does not mean that everyone in a given society behaves exactly the same - that would be collectivism, not freedom. I obviously can't say for certain, but Dr. Paul might even be pleased that people are so passionate to return to themselves their freedom.

Do not forget that Ron Paul has been called time and again a modern Thomas Jefferson, and that Thomas jefferson advocated actions that were far far more violent -- depending on the situation of course. Of course, as far as Thomas Jefferson's violence is concerned, Dr. Paul is inspired more by Ghandi's method for using force than he is by Jefferson

But just because Dr. Paul wouldn't do such a thing (and I firmly believe that he would not) does not mean that he would be disappointed if we DID. Remember, he has spoken in glowing terms about certain non-violent acts of civil disobedience, all the while saying that civil disobedience was not the course that he has charted for himself.

And in the final analysis, the chasing of Sean Hannity was non violent.

Now, with all that having been said, there are some serious problems and dangers associated with the incident that I would like to point out.

First of all, understand that even if you are not a conspiracy theorist or a tinfoil hatter, there really is such a thing as "the establishment" and I'm here to tell you folks, we are opposed to that establishment. It is not unprecedented by any means for the establishment to attempt to destroy a radical movement, by literally planting "agents provcateur" within the ranks of demonstrations to literally cause them to become violent and thus discrediting an anti-establishment movement. It has happened before, and it will happen again. The level of passions which had been raised in that mob, would have made it amazingly simple to have devolved the whole thing into a riot. Indeed, I must say that it is a credit to their discipline and self control that they did not allow it to escalate further than it did.

Secondly, there is a time and a place for passionate protests. I am not specifically saying that this was NOT an appropriate time or place, but this is seriously something you have to give careful thought. We are in this to win this, and I don't mean merely the 2008 Presidential election. We want our nation back, dammit, and we're not going to stop until we succeed. Therefore my advice is to always take the long view. In the short run, this was great, but in the long run, did it give our enemies more ammunition to use against us, than it did to help our side? Be careful ladies and gentlemen - this modern age is not like 1774, and moreso than ever, every action has a consequence.

I have no dispute with the fact that chasing Hannity down and giving him a piece of our mind was just. I am not going to try to argue that it was 'wrong' because I do not believe it was. But with the liberty movement as fragile as it is at this moment, we have to take great care to take the long view always. In the long view, does it do more harm than good?

Yes, there may -- and in all probability WILL come a day when we must stand up with a shaking fist and proclaim, "Give me liberty, or give me death!" Yes, there may -- and in all probability WILL come a day when we must ride out like Paul Revere and alert the minuteman network. Yes, there may -- and in all probability WILL come a day when we have to stand on the far side of Concord Bridge and watch in a cold sweat as the regulars bring death our way, knowing that we must STAND.

But we can't afford to kill the liberty movement before it reaches critical mass. We can still do this in total peace. WE CAN!! The movement is growing, and Americans are waking up. Be careful, be very very careful that we don't do something to turn Americans away in our most fragile hours!
 
I don't get it. Remember a couple days ago before the Iowa caucuses where Hannity actually gave Dr. Paul a fair interview? And now we throw snowballs at him? Geez guys, I agree that Hannity sucks, but no need to be immature and bring Dr. Paul a bad name!

Show us the snow balls. Prove it for fucks sake!
 
NO ONE FROM FOX NEWS WILL EVER "BE ON OUR SIDE"! Whether we throw snowballs or blow him kisses he will still be the same Hannity.

Remember what RP said to Cafferty? "You'll come around.."

Do not forget that people who don't listen, may hear one day. We can not rule anyone out. Back in the 50's my father once said.."You have to be nice to the elevator operator because some day the guy may be your boss".

We can not rule anyone out. Even Hannity. Sometimes people see the error of their ways.
 
Remember what RP said to Cafferty? "You'll come around.."

Do not forget that people who don't listen, may hear one day. We can not rule anyone out. Back in the 50's my father once said.."You have to be nice to the elevator operator because some day the guy may be your boss".

We can not rule anyone out. Even Hannity. Sometimes people see the error of their ways.


But in this case it was so blatantly obvious how wrong it was to exclude Dr. Paul that even a mentally challenged 2 year old could have seen it.
 
Enough of this shit about not going after Hannity because he gave Ron Paul an interview on his RADIO SHOW.

He is GUILTY BY ASSOCIATION. He did NOT stand up for Ron Paul when Fox kicked him out of the debate.
 
At the end of the day if supporters are throwing snowballs then they are not practicing what the principles of Dr. Paul. Dr. Paul would never use force and or violence to get his own way, therfore, the supporters shouldn't.

Those of you who threw the snowballs, go to your room, get some dignity and don't come out until you can follow the ideology of the man you profess to support!
 
Back
Top