Hand Count Shows 15% For Ron Paul

  • Thread starter Thread starter RonPaulCult
  • Start date Start date
R

RonPaulCult

Guest
Here are the stats for the parts of NH that count votes by hand only - no machines

Ron Paul got over 10% in ALL of the hand counted counties:


http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=749

UPDATE:

Just crunching the numbers myself I've noticed that in these same counties Obama won almost all of them and usually but quite a large margin:

Richmond: Ob: 37.46% Cl: 34.98%
Lyman: Ob: 41.23% Cl: 29.82%
Orange: Ob: 44.87% Cl: 30.77
Harts: Ob: 69.23% CL: 23.08%
Wentworth: Ob: 32.92% Cl: 40.37%
Goshen: Ob: 39.08% Cl 31.61%
Marlow: Ob: 32.02% Cl: 38.92%
Cornish: Ob:41.26% Cl: 26.05
Rumney: Ob: 36.14 Cl: 31.46%
Croydon: Ob: 48.59% Cl: 32.39%
Dorchester: Ob: 41.82% Cl: 21.82%
effingham: Ob: 31.76% Cl: 41.89%
Albany: Ob: 42.27 Cl: 29.9%
Antrim: 41.72% Cl: 29.91%

Please continue to do this research for me if you want - I flew to London last night and I have serious jetlag or I'd do the rest myself.
 
Last edited:
Okay you're starting to make me believe in this whole fraud business...

Bump
 
so what do we do...or in this case THEY do?

We can't win a race in a car with 3 wheels.
 
couldnt it just be the diebold areas are more liberal or something? hmm.. wait.. that might mean they might vote MORE for Paul.. hmm im confused.
 
bump, what can we do about this, contact HQ? tell them to pay for a manual recount...
 
Statistically impossible

or improbable. Unless of course he got 5 percent in the big cities.
 
It is a possibility this could be explained by a third correlating variable. But there is just too much evidence now to not investigate.
 
Yes. There should be a recount if the people of New Hampshire request one.

No, The official RP campaign should not pay 63K for a recount, or demand one. That's absurd.

It should be free of charge since they made the mistake in the first place.

If anything we should get a 31% discount for the 31 Ron Paul votes that were unaccounted for in Sutton. :eek:

Either that, or... we could go in 50/50 with the Obama people for a full state-wide recount, because in my view he was also was cheated. :D
 
Obama going in with us on this could make a splash.. in a good way
 
Mike Mitrosky said:
couldnt it just be the diebold areas are more liberal or something? hmm.. wait.. that might mean they might vote MORE for Paul.. hmm im confused.
Click to expand...

This is what confuses me. Areas that are handcounted are more rural. The results show that Paul has an increased count in A) rural counties B) hand counted counties.

It is impossible to know which one is the cause. The thing that confuses me the most is that one would think that the populated areas would vote more or Paul for these reasons 1) more educated 2) more liberal against the war 3) more interent savvy. Perhaps Paul does the worst near cities for reasons unknown.
 
Yeah we need Obama. Someone do the research and see if Obama's handcount votes were higher than Hillary's.
 
Could this just be the result of a different relationship?

For example, perhaps RP did better in places with smaller voter turnouts. These places would see no need for a voting machine, so the stats would make sense.

In places with a higher turnout, they may want the machines. And Paul may not do well with the high turnout of uninformed voters.

Just a thought, I have no idea if there is a correlation between voting machines and number of voters.
 
Something is seriously wrong. I demand a hand recount of all diebold districts!
 
Were the larger, college areas hand counted? There were a few large college precincts still uncounted, when I went to bed. I was hoping that would turn things around. When I checked this morning, nothing had changed. Huckabee's numbers had gone down, but Paul's had not gone up. I found this odd.
 
LionHeart87 said:
Yeah we need Obama. Someone do the research and see if Obama's handcount votes were higher than Hillary's.
Click to expand...

YES THEY WERE!!! the machine-counts potentially cost him 1st place!

hand counted votes overall:
Obama - 38.785%
Clinton - 34.703%

machine counted votes overall:
Clinton - 40.121%
Obama - 35.756%

Call the Obama campaign and ask them to look into this. Ask them to team up with the Paul campaign. I did a few minutes ago. The guy who answered said that was the first he had heard of this. He got pretty excited and said he would pass the info up the chain.

source: http://ronrox.com/paulstats.php (site based on the xml feeding politico: http://www.politico.com/nhprimaries/xml/done.xml)


Obama Campaign HQ: (866) 675-2008

EDIT --- also check the polls for NH the day before. Obama was avg 38%; Clinton was 30%; no poll had Clinton ahead of Obama (or even close, for that matter)

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...w_hampshire_democratic_primary-194.html#polls
 
Last edited:
Deep down inside, I think we all saw this coming. We didn't want to believe it, but I think it was inevitable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

literatim
Hand Count in NH Shows 15% For Ron Paul
2 3
Replies
50
Views
5K
Joe3113
J
Back
Top