H.R. 1955 a letter from my Congresman

Ah, short of lobotomizing the entire earth I find it funny they need to "study" these groups. Supposedly something that's already happening. Look at the past. Revolts rise up because of oppressive rulers. Hahaha.

We're screwed.
 
Here's the one I got from Sherrod Brown in Ohio, who is paying these people????

Dear Mr. --------------:

Thank you for expressing your concerns about H.R.1955 and S.1959, the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act.

H.R.1955 and S.1959 amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to add provisions concerning the prevention of terrorism by those born, raised, or based and operating primarily in the United States.

The bill would direct the Department of Homeland Security to establish a grant program to help prevent homegrown terrorism and the use of extremist belief systems to facilitate ideologically-based violence. It would also establish a university-based Center of Excellence for the Study of Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism in the United States and conduct a survey of methodologies implemented by foreign nations to prevent radicalization and homegrown terrorism.

In addition, the bill explicitly states that the Department of Homeland Security's efforts to prevent ideologically based violence and homegrown terrorism may not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights, or civil liberties of any American citizens or lawful permanent residents.

H.R.1955 passed in the House of Representatives by a vote of 404 to 6. Should S.1959 reach the Senate floor, I will keep your views in mind. Thank you again for contacting me.

Sincerely,
Sherrod Brown
 
Nothing can hurt your constitutional rights as long as you own firearms. Thats why this type of thing doesnt bother me.

I dislike it because a lot of good folks dont -have- firearms, but still. For myself and my family, this bill is just another conversation peice. If it affects my life (and infringes on my rights), then its war without end.
 
Nothing can hurt your constitutional rights as long as you own firearms. Thats why this type of thing doesnt bother me.

I dislike it because a lot of good folks dont -have- firearms, but still. For myself and my family, this bill is just another conversation peice. If it affects my life (and infringes on my rights), then its war without end.

http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin392.htm
Pastors will take your guns?
 

Sheep. I understand the need for "peace", but there is a difference between a peaceful person, and a sheep. I would advise that no one allow anyone on this earth to take away their firearms, at any cost.

The rationale for this is simple - if you do not own a weapon, you cannot defend yourself (within reason) against those who do.

If every American were armed, we would see very different government policies than what we have now. :)
 
Nothing can hurt your constitutional rights as long as you own firearms. Thats why this type of thing doesnt bother me.

I dislike it because a lot of good folks dont -have- firearms, but still. For myself and my family, this bill is just another conversation peice. If it affects my life (and infringes on my rights), then its war without end.

Conservatives have allowed insane judges on the bench. No longer is there "anti" government liberals dominating the bench. The Supreme Court sided with the people in the Ruby Ridge incident, that will never happen again. You have a right to bear arms, no problem... you need to rethink about what that really means. If the government has protection from the Supreme Court in your use of said arms, are you even really as free as you think you are?

You can't stop them now... people who care about liberty must think about these things from all aspects. Stop ignoring what kind of Judges people will assign to the bench. Alito and Roberts are political pawns, and are a danger to everything people talk about here...
 
Back
Top