gretawire poll.............rand is 3rd.

[jbauer]

second Paul 22.46% (5,246 votes)

316 votes behind Trump

 

[jbauer]

I'm going to get a couple more through my other browsers and computers/phone/tablets

 

[squirl22]

voted

 

[Dary]

Rand is in first.

Paul 23.61% (5,608 votes)
Trump 23.49% (5,580 votes)

MB at: $225,919.83

 

[Dianne]

Rand is in first.
Paul 23.61% (5,608 votes)

Trump 23.49% (5,580 votes)

When I click Vote, nothing comes up. Has the polling ended?

 

[Dary]

When I click Vote, nothing comes up. Has the polling ended?

I'm not sure. But if it has, then Rand won.

 

[Origanalist]

Worked for me...

Thank you for voting!
Paul 23.73% (5,646 votes)

 

[Natural Citizen]

Paul in 1st place now at 23.87% (5,692 votes)

Trump is at 23.41% (5,582 votes)

Cruz follows both at 16.26% (3,877 votes)

 

[PCKY]

Just voted. Paul no. 1 with 7045 votes.

 

[nasaal]

I don't completely understand the point of working so hard to win these polls.

 

[Dr.3D]

I don't completely understand the point of working so hard to win these polls.

Just shows, if polls can be artificially increased, they can also be artificially suppressed.

 

[Mr Stealth]

I'd vote, but to do so, I'd have to enable cookies and about a million scripts, and I refuse to trade my privacy and marketing data for a trivial vote that won't be reported by anyone. My guess is that this is the only reason sites like Fox news and any other major news outlet runs these types of straw polls. They don't give a shit who wins and it's probably one of the few ways to profit off Paul voters who would rather see everyone at Fox News be buried alive in salt than support their shitty network.

But good work to everyone else voting and getting our boy up there.

I should add, when you don't break a link, you give the linked website full access to where you're coming from. In other words, Fox news can see that we're all coming from RonPaulForums.com. In fact, they see the link to this exact thread.

Pardon me while I venture into conspiracy territory, but if I wanted to locate and infiltrate the social networks of my enemies, I would use something like this poll that would be circulated to many users within many communities, and then hire infiltrators to attack the top referrering sites. There are known tactics that can be used to steer the discussion of web forums. By not breaking the link, you're basically saying to Fox news or anyone with the referring data, "The Rand Paul Grassroots lives here. Please come in."

 

[Jan2017]

Voted.
. . .
Does Greta ever report these results on air?

It would be nice if she did, but her Fox censors would red-flag data like this . . .

Paul 28.22% (7,179 votes)


Trump 22.12% (5,627 votes)


Cruz 15.35% (3,905 votes)

 

[TheNewYorker]

Im going to run a voting script tonight, you should see Rand climb up to about 60% by tomorrow

 

[Jan2017]

Thank you, we have already counted your vote.

It seems it won't count a vote from same machine more than once, so vote script probably won't work. At least I had a couple votes in.

 

[TheNewYorker]

It seems it won't count a vote from same machine more than once, so vote script probably won't work. At least I had a couple votes in.

Open incognito or private tab/window on your browser to vote again. Close, and repeat to vote a third time.

Alternately you can clear cookies and cache of browser after voting, but that seems more tedious.

 

[Jan2017]

Open incognito or private tab/window on your browser to vote again. Close, and repeat to vote a third time.

Alternately you can clear cookies and cache of browser after voting, but that seems more tedious.

Thank you for voting!


Paul 28.34% (7,226 votes)
Trump 22.09% (5,631 votes)
Cruz 15.32% (3,906 votes)

Hah, . . . same computer as above, opened Internet Explorer instead of Chrome, so yeah, that did work.
But closing browser and then back did not, for moi

 

[nasaal]

Just shows, if polls can be artificially increased, they can also be artificially suppressed.

It doesn't though. It shows that unofficial online polls are completely unrealistic representations. It also shows that while we complain about Paul being marginalized, that we will go to great lengths to misrepresent his following. So.....What's the point again?

 

[Dr.3D]

It doesn't though. It shows that unofficial online polls are completely unrealistic representations. It also shows that while we complain about Paul being marginalized, that we will go to great lengths to misrepresent his following. So.....What's the point again?

As if the official polls are any different.

 

[KEEF]

Winning!!
[FONT=inherit !important]
Paul 28.58% (7,313 votes)


Trump 22.02% (5,633 votes)


Cruz 15.27% (3,906 votes)


Huckabee 10.99% (2,813 votes)


Rubio 10.65% (2,725 votes)


Carson 7.11% (1,820 votes)


Santorum 1.77% (452 votes)


Fiorina 1.35% (346 votes)


Christie 1.29% (331 votes)


Bush 0.5% (127 votes)


Kasich 0.47% (120 votes)


Total Votes: 25,586
[/FONT]