"Grease" to get full woke re-boot: trans-queeers, lesbians and anti-racism plots

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,609
‘Grease’ Gets a Woke Prequel Series with ‘Marginalized’ Lead Characters, ***** and Antiracist Plotlines

https://www.breitbart.com/entertain...ad-characters-*****-and-antiracist-plotlines/

WARNER TODD HUSTON 12 Feb 2023

An upcoming Paramount+ spinoff series for the 1978 hit John Travolta movie Grease is aiming for an ultra-woke theme by focusing on characters with a “marginalized identity,” lesbian kissing scenes, and more — all set in 1954, supposedly four years before the events chronicled in the films.

Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies will air on the Paramount+ streaming service starting in April and is set to follow the creation of the quasi girl gang called the Pink Ladies.

The group was led by Rizzo (Stockard Channing) in the 1978 film and was made up of the misfits and outcast girls of Rydell High School. The new series will be set in 1954, just before rock-n-roll took over the nation’s imagination and before the characters of the original series entered high school, according to Deadline.

But, despite that it is set in 1954 — decades before wokeism and even before the Civil Rights movement — the series is apparently going to focus on woke sex roles, lesbian relationships, transgenderism, racism, and characters with “marginalized identity.”

The series also won’t even feature any of the original characters. There will be no Rizzo, no Frenchie, nor a Marty or Jan. The series is set years before any of the characters from the movies entered Rydell High. In addition, Rydell has a very diverse student body, which apparently got wiped out entirely in a mere four years between this story and the events of Grease.

In comments made during a Television Critic’s Association Press Tour panel on Feb. 6, showrunner and executive producer Annabel Oakes spoke about why she is making a series that diverges so sharply from the originals. At the event, she gushed about the “beautiful, interesting and unexpected stories from people of all different walks of life,” she was hearing when she began looking into the 50s and 60s ahead of producing the new series. She claimed she spoke to “popular girls” as well as “radical lesbian feminists” and people of all races for her research into the era.

After that ground work, Oakes staffed her writer’s room with diversity and set out to expand the Grease universe to appeal to a new audience.

The result is stark. The series “dives into diverse storytelling around race and sexuality. The show’s primary characters are mainly women of color and ***** women, and the series explores what it meant to be marginalized in the 1950s,” AdWeek reported.

At the same panel, one of the cast, Ari Notartomaso who portrays Pink Lady Cynthia, claimed that the series is set to take on many serious topics. “Our characters will get to experience from a different lens and how those experiences overlap with others with a marginalized identity,” Notartomaso said. “I think we have the opportunity to represent another struggle that overlaps with things we’re dealing with today like racism.”

Even the music will not follow the template for the original movies and instead of featuring rock-n-roll-inspired new music, the series will instead evoke “Latinx” and black music of the ’40s and ’50s, according to Entertainment Weekly.

Despite appearing to have none of the features of the original movies, Oakes insisted that fans of the original should be happy” with the new series. However, she opined: “Any time you do a period piece, you are using a little bit of a modern lens and you’re talking about what’s different and also what hasn’t changed.”
 
It's a tried and true recipe. Make a gay show that nobody wants to watch and slap a proven label on it to get unwitting viewers. I give it one season tops. The way it's described, I wouldn't be surprised if even wokesters stay away from this one.
 
So, a gay-er version of Fame set in the '50's.

I'm sure that pubic skool art and music teachers across the country will demand that their victims watch this.
 
An upcoming Paramount+ spinoff series for the 1978 hit John Travolta movie Grease is aiming for an ultra-woke theme by focusing on characters with a “marginalized identity,” lesbian kissing scenes, and more — all set in 1954, supposedly four years before the events chronicled in the films.

One of the favorite techniques of these parasitic vandals is the use of prequel matter to "retcon" and "recontextualize" already-existing narrative continuities which they could never have hoped to create themselves. As a result of their utter creative bankruptcy, they can only hijack and "repurpose" the creations of their betters. They are not able to construct anything (at least, not anything a substantial number of other people would be at all interested in or inclined to see, read, etc.), and so they are forced to resort to "deconstructing" (i.e., destroying) beloved things - things that have already earned an audience on their merits and the skill of their creators.

For just a few examples right off the top of my head, see The Rings of Power ("diversified" Tolkien for "modern" audiences) ... or SJW-ized Superman ... or hyper-cringed Velma ... and so on and so on ...

On those extremely rare occasions when they do try to do their own thing, they fail miserably - see, for example, Snowflake and Safespace, which was an ironic, self-aware attempt to rebut the notion that audiences aren't interested in agenda-driven narratives in which "the message" comes first and story values come second (if they even rate at all).

https://twitter.com/pauldrossi/status/1617679122272260096
RYdv8U2.png
 
Thanks [MENTION=28167]Occam's Banana[/MENTION] I was going to ask you for that tweet comment that perfectly describes this.
 
They are creatively bankrupt---that's why they choose remakes over creativity. Rinse, wash and repeat, just jam down the throats of people a rejected reality and they think they are creative. :rolleyes:
 
One of the favorite techniques of these parasitic vandals is the use of prequel matter to "retcon" and "recontextualize" already-existing narrative continuities which they could never have hoped to create themselves. As a result of their utter creative bankruptcy, they can only hijack and "repurpose" the creations of their betters. They are not able to construct anything (at least, not anything a substantial number of other people would be at all interested in or inclined to see, read, etc.), and so they are forced to resort to "deconstructing" (i.e., destroying) beloved things - things that have already earned an audience on their merits and the skill of their creators.

For just a few examples right off the top of my head, see The Rings of Power ("diversified" Tolkien for "modern" audiences) ... or SJW-ized Superman ... or hyper-cringed Velma ... and so on and so on ...

On those extremely rare occasions when they do try to do their own thing, they fail miserably - see, for example, Snowflake and Safespace, which was an ironic, self-aware attempt to rebut the notion that audiences aren't interested in agenda-driven narratives in which "the message" comes first and story values come second (if they even rate at all).


The quoted Tweet literally says the quiet part out loud, as the cliche goes... this is not an effort to establish new cultural norms. It is a specific and deliberate effort to destroy everything that Western Civilization has constructed and holds dear, and which, I will add, has made the West the best civilization in human history. And these weaklings, these cowards, want to destroy it because they cannot succeed in it. They HATE it, and like cranky little infants, they want to break that which frustrates them.

These people are our enemies. They will continue to destroy everything, no matter what the costs to the success of humanity, unless they are stopped.

There is no other way. They're petulant, uncorrected children. Their asses need slapped.
 
Back
Top