Grand Jury Witness 40′s Claim That Michael Brown Charged “Like a Football Player” Falls Apart

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

From Volume 17 of the grand jury testimony. This is from the woman on the porch.

Note that she confirms the story of several witnesses (including the Monte Carlo passenger) who said that Wilson aggressively backs his car, almost hitting Johnson and Brown. Others witnesses discuss Wilson's screeching tires when he aggressively backs his car, a point that Wilson denied.

If Wilson is backing his car aggressively, then it's not a stretch to believe the testimony claiming Wilson aggressively opened his door on Brown, striking him. Wilson would be the aggressor and escalator here.






Q So when the car back?back, did it back-back like hurriedly or slow or what fashion did the car back-back?

A It was kind of like a fast, it was quick like. I don't know how to explain it.

Q Okay. That's fine. Did it appear to touch the two guys that it back toward?

A It looked like it did. I'm not saying that it did, but the way they jump back, like they were in shock like.

..........

Q Was his arms up the way you showed us when he was being shot?

A Yes, about, like his palms were out facing forward, they were about at his ears, I'd say, like shoulders, about like that.

Q Okay. What did that mean to you to have your arms like that?

A That meant surrender, that meant take me to jail.

QYou thought he was surrendering?

A Yeah.

Q Did you ever see him rush the officer like, you know what I mean by rush?

A Yeah, like he was mad. [?]

Q Was he running toward the officer or charge him?

A I didn't see that.

 

[Cap]

The more that comes out of this farce they call a grand jury, the greater the stench. Concerning the "vote like your life depends on it", even bxm042 is chuckling on that one.

 

[phill4paul]

One point is simple. Salient.

This case should have gone forward.

Period.

It would have. If the DA had intended it to.l

 

[Brian4Liberty]

VOTE.
Vote like your life depended on it....

Is the DA elected? How about the mayor and city council? It's a long-shot, but it could work.

 

[juleswin]

I don't know what to think anymore. On one hand, we've had such luminaries in the liberty movements, giants voices of liberty such as Stephan Molyneux, Peter Schiff and Charles Barkley tell us everything was in the up and up and that justice was served in Ferguson. How can I look at this secretive process where there is no cross examination of witnesses, plus the good words of the folks I mentioned above and say with a straight face that justice was not served?

This is just crazy, I can't say for sure if Darren Wilson was guilty but one thing I know is that his case should have gone to trial. The fact that they did not even find enough in all the back and forth testimonies to take it to trial is complete bullshit.

 

[Czolgosz]

Voting.

Legal system. Justice.

L O L

 

[Suzanimal]

St. Louis prosecutor McCulloch says he knew ‘Witness 40′ lied to Ferguson grand jury


St. Louis County Prosecutor Bob McCulloch said on Friday that he let witnesses who were lying testify before the grand jury that chose not to indict a Ferguson, Missouri police officer for shooting and killing 18-year-old Michael Brown, Buzzfeed reported.

“There were people who came in and, yes, absolutely lied under oath,” McCulloch told KTRS-AM host McGraw Milhaven. “Some lied to the FBI. Even though they’re not under oath, that’s another potential offense — a federal offense. I thought it was much more important to present the entire picture.”

McCulloch explained that he decided to let “anyone who claimed to have witnessed anything” testify before the jurors, out of the belief that he would be criticized no matter how he approached the possible prosecution of Officer Darren Wilson, who Brown following a confrontation this past August.


He also admitted that the testimony of “Witness 40,” identified in a grand jury transcript as 45-year-old Sandra McElroy, lacked credibility.

“This lady clearly wasn’t present when this occurred,” McCulloch said. “She recounted a statement that was right out of the newspaper about Wilson’s actions, and right down the line with Wilson’s actions. Even though I’m sure she was nowhere near the place.”

Buzzfeed reported that there was no indication that McCulloch’s office instructed the grand jury to consider the credibility of any specific witness. His office has already been criticized for not immediately telling the jurors that a state statute giving officers more leeway on use of deadly force had been found unconstitutional. McCulloch himself has also been accused of being biased toward police.

According to the Associated Press, the interview aired amid a demand by state Rep. Karla May (D) that McCulloch be investigated by a bipartisan committee of state lawmakers.

The committee is already looking into why Gov. Jay Nixon (D) did not send the National Guard into Ferguson on Nov. 24 to help stop unrest and property damage in the city immediately following McCulloch’s announcement that Wilson would not be brought to trial.

“Many St. Louis-area residents believe — and there is at least some evidence to suggest — that Mr. McCulloch manipulated the grand jury process from the beginning to ensure that Officer Wilson would not be indicted,” May said in a letter to the committee’s chairperson, state Sen. Kurt Schaefer (R).

Brown’s death sparked demonstrations accusing police of regularly using excessive force. The protests intensified last month, after the jury decided not to indict Wilson, and took on more momentum after another grand jury in Staten Island, New York, declined to charge NYPD Officer Daniel Pantaleo in the choking death of Eric Garner.

“If I didn’t put those witnesses on, then we’d be discussing now why I didn’t put those witnesses on,” McCulloch said on Friday. “Even though their statements were not accurate. So my determination was to put everybody on and let the grand jurors assess their credibility, which they did.”

Watch Millhaven’s interview with McCulloch, as posted online on Friday, below.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/12/...-knew-witness-40-lied-to-ferguson-grand-jury/

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Okay. Witness # 40 lied. Witness #10 lied and was "not sure". Are there any other witnesses that back up Darren Wilson?

Wilson supporters talked about others changing their stories, but conveniently dismiss the lies and inconsistencies of 40 and 10. McElroy (witness 40) even admitted to lying about her original reason for being in the neighborhood. Witness 10 first said Brown was on the sidewalk, but changed it to Brown being in the street.

I don't think any other witness describe the "charge" that these two described. Other witnesses described a mixture of actions, such as Brown having his hands up, looking at his hand wound, etc.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

“This lady clearly wasn’t present when this occurred,” McCulloch said. “She recounted a statement that was right out of the newspaper about Wilson’s actions, and right down the line with Wilson’s actions. Even though I’m sure she was nowhere near the place.”

There are two possibilities for the action of McElroy (witness 40). One explanation is that she is so medically manic and hates blacks so much that she risks perjury by approaching the DA and making up a story.

The other possibility is that someone approached her after seeing her Wilson Facebook support page and then offered her several hundred dollars to approach the DA with a false story. Her two convictions for passing bad checks means it would not take much money for her to do this.

The bogus story of the anonymous woman "Josie" on national radio is significant. Josie's identity has not been exposed, but I have no doubt that she represents the police and floated the story on the radio talk show. She was not just some friend of Wilson's spouse who just happened to randomly call a national radio show one day. It was a carefully constructed and purposeful plan.

I might guess that McElroy's mania might have caused her action, but would not discount someone giving her a few hundred dollars to create the fake story.

 

[Lucille]

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=229677

Lying to a Grand Jury is perjury. It is a crime.

So is suborning perjury; the persuading or allowing of someone to swear falsely under oath.

If McCulloch knew that this "witness" could not have actually witnessed the shooting and yet put her in front of the Grand Jury he committed a crime as well.

And now McCulloch has admitted he knew this to be the case:

He made reference to one woman who claimed to have seen the shooting. McCulloch said she "clearly wasn't present. She recounted a story right out of the newspaper" that backed up Wilson's version of events, he said.

This leaves only one question before a felony indictment must issue against McCulloch: When did he become aware of this -- before or after her testimony was given? If before then as an officer of the court he must stand accused of suborning perjury, be tried and, upon conviction be imprisoned for, that offense.

Never mind the obvious false charge given to the Grand Jury that I have reported on before which is a separate and distinct offense.

 

[jmdrake]

“If I didn’t put those witnesses on, then we’d be discussing now why I didn’t put those witnesses on,” McCulloch said on Friday. “Even though their statements were not accurate. So my determination was to put everybody on and let the grand jurors assess their credibility, which they did.”

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/12/...-knew-witness-40-lied-to-ferguson-grand-jury/

What a crock! If he had been going for an indictment, which he wasn't, he would have only put on witnesses that were against Wilson. If he was merely "going for the truth", which he wasn't, then he would have vigorously cross examined these "clearly non credible" witnesses all the way around. As it stands he only attacked the witnesses that went against Wilson.

 

[jmdrake]

I don't know what to think anymore. On one hand, we've had such luminaries in the liberty movements, giants voices of liberty such as Stephan Molyneux, Peter Schiff and Charles Barkley tell us everything was in the up and up and that justice was served in Ferguson. How can I look at this secretive process where there is no cross examination of witnesses, plus the good words of the folks I mentioned above and say with a straight face that justice was not served?

Charles Barkley a giant of liberty? I never thought that. And when it comes to police violence, he was excusing the cop in the Eric Garner choking. If he can somehow think that was okay then of course he'll excuse Mike Brown.

Stefan Moleneuax gave a one sided analysis that focused solely on the BS the leftist media was pumping about the "gentle giant" Mike Brown and he gave this analysis early on. Also Stefan is sometimes..well...full of it. Peter Schiff? Great on economics, but is okay with bombing Iran based on "credible intelligence" of them getting close to a nuclear bomb.

This is just crazy, I can't say for sure if Darren Wilson was guilty but one thing I know is that his case should have gone to trial. The fact that they did not even find enough in all the back and forth testimonies to take it to trial is complete bullshit.

My thoughts exactly! Had Wilson been indicted and ultimately acquitted I would have been okay with that. I'm okay with the George Zimmerman acquittal. It's the short circuiting of the process that's the problem.

 

[BarryDonegan]

From Volume 17 of the grand jury testimony. This is from the woman on the porch.

Note that she confirms the story of several witnesses (including the Monte Carlo passenger) who said that Wilson aggressively backs his car, almost hitting Johnson and Brown. Others witnesses discuss Wilson's screeching tires when he aggressively backs his car, a point that Wilson denied.

If Wilson is backing his car aggressively, then it's not a stretch to believe the testimony claiming Wilson aggressively opened his door on Brown, striking him. Wilson would be the aggressor and escalator here.






Q So when the car back?back, did it back-back like hurriedly or slow or what fashion did the car back-back?

A It was kind of like a fast, it was quick like. I don't know how to explain it.

Q Okay. That's fine. Did it appear to touch the two guys that it back toward?

A It looked like it did. I'm not saying that it did, but the way they jump back, like they were in shock like.

..........

Q Was his arms up the way you showed us when he was being shot?

A Yes, about, like his palms were out facing forward, they were about at his ears, I'd say, like shoulders, about like that.

Q Okay. What did that mean to you to have your arms like that?

A That meant surrender, that meant take me to jail.

QYou thought he was surrendering?

A Yeah.

Q Did you ever see him rush the officer like, you know what I mean by rush?

A Yeah, like he was mad. [?]

Q Was he running toward the officer or charge him?

A I didn't see that.

That does seem to corroborate Johnson's testimony.