Gospel of Pragmatism

[David Merrill]

thanks for not addressing any of my questions and refusing to say if you would give control of the castle back, as the true owner has requested.
this really shows where your heart is, imo.
but hey, you has some legal document that says you control the castle, so i will just leave that alone.

good luck with your lawful money thing. i suspect it will fail, as all the other lawful money redemption/non tax paying people have come to find.
i hope teh govt doesnt end up taking the castle back, after all that jim has gone through.

for people who dont know, the govt has tries to stop jim from building the castles for YEARS.
he got no permits, uses rocks he collects from public lands and just does his own thing.
sad it has turned out this way, imo

I suspect that you would have arrived where you are just the same if I had simply pointed out that you are where you are because of libel and slander in irresponsible journalism. In other words, you do not know what you are talking about and the BISHOP family has been led into a very bad place mentally and emotionally. That is one of the top reasons that the Trust will not be revoked. Phoebe recently said something to me about financing it and preventing this was one of the motivating reasons to form the Trust. A bank attorney would fence it off pretty fast.

This is about managing liability. If you would read Pragmatism (CLICK HERE) you might get some better understanding but it might be suffice to say that Jim and I do not think like other people. I have been behind preventing the government seize engine all along. This is why they appointed me First Trustee.

If you identify with Ron Paul-style libertarianism, then this passage might not be beyond you. If you ponder on it though, it should blow your mind!

Title 26 USC §501(c)(3)​

I italicize church above regarding Paul’s formation of ecclesia because this organization – church or association of churches – is actually a Disqualified Organization in the description of Title 26 USC §501(c)(3) government-sanctioned tax-free non-profit religious organizations. Virtually every church of significance in America is §501(c)(3) but by legal definition, not a single one of these churches is actually a church in the sense of being an ecclesia sanctified to God/Jesus as its Creator!

In summary Disqualified Organizations as found in Title 26 USC §501(c)(3) are churches described at Title 26 USC §170 and there we find the description …churches and associations of churches. More interesting though is that Title 26 USC §501(c)(3) corporate persons who await approval by the IRS for their tax-exempt status are found awaiting approval at Title 26 USC §508. Typically in the bylaws of any Title 26 USC §501(c)(3) church we find stipulated certain restrictions:

No part of the net earnings of the Center shall inure to the benefit of or be distributable to any member of the Center which is not then an exempt organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Therefore all the People allegedly in the CHURCH are not considered people but rather, are Title 26 USC §501(c)(3) corporate persons awaiting approval found at Title 26 USC §508! Thank God (quite literally) that Title 26 USC §508 (C)(1)(a) recognizes these same churches and associations of churches as Mandatory Exception to the Internal Revenue Code entirely. The point being that the church recognized to have nothing to do with the Federal Reserve System (IRS) is NOT the church created by Paul while in Roman protective custody! Paul’s church is the church he formed from Rome – appropriately a government-sanctioned religious organization found at Title 26 USC §501(c)(3) – also known as Christianity. In preparation for Castle Church near the end of this treatise please begin to understand why Pragmatism forming a Mandatory Exception profits from this Gospel of Pragmatism being derived from a radical interpretation of the Parable of Mark if you will, so as to never be confused with Christianity.

Daniel Vernon, Jim's son could not locate me for permission to put my name on that sign. You might have noted the dates on some of Jim's early process.

http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_certificate_falsified.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_certificate_corrected.jpg

I am not sure how many ways I can explain this through rational thinking and process if you choose emotion.


More important though, for your understanding, Phoebe asked me before signing papers, There are a lot of people who would love to have ownership control of the Castle. What do you hope to get out of owning it?

Do you see how she asked that?

I did not want to own the Castle because it is to be frank quite a dangerous liability. Jim built it under the impression that God protects everybody and that is difficult to argue about since nobody ever gets hurt. But for what I am getting paid I prefer to leave the liability on God. My pay is described above and these things about merging heritage into a destiny for mankind are things that Jim and I conjured in many hours of discussion. These are artifacts of imagination and I know from my friend James Roland that there is a great appeal to speaking of the Castle's future being secured into a well thought out plan for long after he dies. The Trust will be living for as long as there are laws to protect property.

So to your post Kelly;


I do not mean to be offensive but compared to the future of a multi-million dollar unequivocally unique, single artist piece of art that will be lasting longer than your youngest grandchildren, where you think my heart is means very little. One thing blatantly clear to me from this is that TV News, radio and newspapers have been reduced to the same junior high social media found on the slur website and truth and fact are nothing relevant compared to getting people, who have gone numb, to feel. - And people jump to fear and anger sadly, much faster than to love and joy.

Another way to see it might be that since Jim and Phoebe went into this with eyes wide open and with a coherent plan then reversing the Trust upon the immature behavior, especially from the daughters with this slur and hate campaign, that by the way was a class 6 felony until 2013, would be extremely foolish.


Regards,

David Merrill
First Trustee for CASTLE CHURCH - For the Redemption of the Office BISHOP.

 

[Sola_Fide]

Hmmm. What's going on in here?

 

[Kelly.]

I suspect that you would have arrived where you are just the same if I had simply pointed out that you are where you are because of libel and slander in irresponsible journalism. In other words, you do not know what you are talking about and the BISHOP family has been led into a very bad place mentally and emotionally. That is one of the top reasons that the Trust will not be revoked. Phoebe recently said something to me about financing it and preventing this was one of the motivating reasons to form the Trust. A bank attorney would fence it off pretty fast.

This is about managing liability. If you would read Pragmatism (CLICK HERE) you might get some better understanding but it might be suffice to say that Jim and I do not think like other people. I have been behind preventing the government seize engine all along. This is why they appointed me First Trustee.

If you identify with Ron Paul-style libertarianism, then this passage might not be beyond you. If you ponder on it though, it should blow your mind!

Daniel Vernon, Jim's son could not locate me for permission to put my name on that sign. You might have noted the dates on some of Jim's early process.

http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_certificate_falsified.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_certificate_corrected.jpg

I am not sure how many ways I can explain this through rational thinking and process if you choose emotion.


More important though, for your understanding, Phoebe asked me before signing papers, There are a lot of people who would love to have ownership control of the Castle. What do you hope to get out of owning it?

Do you see how she asked that?

I did not want to own the Castle because it is to be frank quite a dangerous liability. Jim built it under the impression that God protects everybody and that is difficult to argue about since nobody ever gets hurt. But for what I am getting paid I prefer to leave the liability on God. My pay is described above and these things about merging heritage into a destiny for mankind are things that Jim and I conjured in many hours of discussion. These are artifacts of imagination and I know from my friend James Roland that there is a great appeal to speaking of the Castle's future being secured into a well thought out plan for long after he dies. The Trust will be living for as long as there are laws to protect property.

So to your post Kelly;


I do not mean to be offensive but compared to the future of a multi-million dollar unequivocally unique, single artist piece of art that will be lasting longer than your youngest grandchildren, where you think my heart is means very little. One thing blatantly clear to me from this is that TV News, radio and newspapers have been reduced to the same junior high social media found on the slur website and truth and fact are nothing relevant compared to getting people, who have gone numb, to feel. - And people jump to fear and anger sadly, much faster than to love and joy.

Another way to see it might be that since Jim and Phoebe went into this with eyes wide open and with a coherent plan then reversing the Trust upon the immature behavior, especially from the daughters with this slur and hate campaign, that by the way was a class 6 felony until 2013, would be extremely foolish.


Regards,

David Merrill
First Trustee for CASTLE CHURCH - For the Redemption of the Office BISHOP.

i think me and you live in different worlds.
you can ignore reality, but you cant ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.

good luck with your irs exemption and your lawful money thing.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Hmmm. What's going on in here?

Sadly, I think some form of "Chrisopher Brown" crazy.

 

[David Merrill]

Very true. Like you suggest though, we both believe in one objective truth.

Maybe Jim and I both fell into believing in the concept of Monuments. His Castle Art is monumental and now stands upon a survey from 1629 - The Charter for Freedoms and Exemptions Granted to Patroons. Breaking out the linguistics:


David Merrill = Beloved Teacher of God
VAN PELT = Son of the Patroon

For a little insight just take fifteen minutes to study this song in three different YouTube videos.


[video=youtube;J5VGILERzgg]46 and 2 Kids Cover[/video]

46 and 2 Explained




I can only speak for Jim where he expressed things to me. It seems plain however that putting the Castle Art into an irrevocable trust is intended for the future. That is still the plan.

The Mandatory Exception from the illusion debt is money is really the safe place for the Castle. Since debt as money is an illusion, the Castle resides with everything else but is a pioneer monument. - Like Jim!

 

[Kelly.]

Hmmm. What's going on in here?

david believes he has found some way to be exempt from paying taxes, based on some obscure legal interpretation he has made.
he completely looses me with the church ties to rome, but i dont worry about that to much, i doubt the judge will let him get that far when the time comes.

none of that i really have a problem with - it seems he has convinced Jim Bishop and his wife to enter into a trust which give him control over the castle.
once Jim dies, and he will, he has incurable cancer (and david knows this) i suspect david will get control of the castle.
in my view, he basically conned the original owner out of the castle, based on some BS about taxes.

its a bit deeper then that though. david has created a world in which he is always right. he wont address specific questions and speaking in codes.
David Merrill Van Pelt his full name. you can find more shenanigans here: http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=David+Merrill+Van+Pelt

 

[Anti Federalist]

david believes he has found some way to be exempt from paying taxes, based on some obscure legal interpretation he has made.
he completely looses me with the church ties to rome, but i dont worry about that to much, i doubt the judge will let him get that far when the time comes.

none of that i really have a problem with - it seems he has convinced Jim Bishop and his wife to enter into a trust which give him control over the castle.
once Jim dies, and he will, he has incurable cancer (and david knows this) i suspect david will get control of the castle.
in my view, he basically conned the original owner out of the castle, based on some BS about taxes.

its a bit deeper then that though. david has created a world in which he is always right. he wont address specific questions and speaking in codes.
David Merrill Van Pelt his full name. you can find more shenanigans here: http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=David+Merrill+Van+Pelt

So the whole thing will get thrown out, SWAT raiders will seize the property for non payment of taxes and Jim will be dead and government that he fought against his whole life, will now own his legacy.

That about the long and short of it?

 

[Kelly.]

So the whole thing will get thrown out, SWAT raiders will seize the property for non payment of taxes and Jim will be dead and government that he fought against his whole life, will now own his legacy.

That about the long and short of it?

this is essentially how i see it playing out.
i see it as an extension (or a slice) of the sovereign citizen movement - which may win some fights, but no doubt will lose the war (my opinion)

i wonder if the Trust can be broken if it can be proved that it was formed under false pretenses (in this case, and IRS exemption, that isnt true).


the funny thing is, all of this is happening ~ 1 hour from CO Springs - the home of the mega church. with all of their fancy lawyers, you'd have thought they would have come across this as well.

 

[David Merrill]

the funny thing is, all of this is happening ~ 1 hour from CO Springs - the home of the mega church. with all of their fancy lawyers, you'd have thought they would have come across this as well.

Key emoticon - confused.

Yes indeed, this must be very confusing for you. This is the elder abuse I am speaking about. If you pretend to know Jim he would never resort to attorneys because of this attachment they hold with the Fed. As I stand in the gap between Jim & Phoebe and government, it would appear that Jim has been coerced into ranting against me, in complete control of the Castle Art, as though I am government.



It is sad that even in this forum you feel that Jim and I, in forming an irrevocable trust are the confused parties. This is a carefully planned legacy for Jim's life work and you are misconstruing the entire legal structure by being inside a criminal syndicalism where debt still functions as currency. I imagine though, that some of the readers here get it while reading through my posts, simply by ignoring you!

For example, do you realize that Dr. Ronald Ernest (PAUL) is one of the few Congressmen who is NOT an attorney? Too bad he has never read the Federal Reserve Act carefully with an open mind, huh? If he had discovered remedy before all those bills that flopped before they even reached the Floor...

Please understand that it is always interesting to me seeking out the impediment between you and joy, peace, unity and love. Did you actually read Pragmatism (CLICK HERE)? Do you dare?

 

[David Merrill]

i wonder if the Trust can be broken if it can be proved that it was formed under false pretenses (in this case, and IRS exemption, that isnt true).

Like I have shown you from the IRS Code, quoting Pragmatism this is a special place for the true church called Mandatory Exception (CLICK HERE). Find (c)(1)(a):

(c) Exceptions

(1) Mandatory exceptions

Subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply to—

(A) churches, their integrated auxiliaries, and conventions or associations of churches, or​

Please stop accusing the beneficiaries of fraud/false pretenses. You seem to forget that these are actions executed by Jim and Phoebe, not me.

 

[David Merrill]

Here is a recent rendition of the Gospel of Pramatism (Click Here).

 

[Kelly.]

I thought this was interesting:

there is also an ongoing think tank to help Jim keep the castle:
http://gazette.com/save-bishops-castle-think-tank-meeting/article/1557718

 

[osan]

Hmmm. What's going on in here?

I believe it is commonly called "buggery".

 

[Kelly.]

court case settled - the castle is going back to Jim Bishop.
http://www.westword.com/news/famed-roadside-attraction-bishop-castle-gets-a-happy-ending-7182658

odd how David has been around to explain his actions in the past few months.

 

[pcosmar]

court case settled - the castle is going back to Jim Bishop.
http://www.westword.com/news/famed-roadside-attraction-bishop-castle-gets-a-happy-ending-7182658

odd how David has been around to explain his actions in the past few months.

He's back.

 

[timosman]

He's back.

Gospel of Pragmatism or How to lie to yourself without getting caught.