Luciconsort
Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2011
- Messages
- 256
it's not hard to find....
Last edited by a moderator:
Google Changes Settings to Make Porn Harder to Find
- Thread starter stu2002
- Start date
Good job Beavis...
Luciconsort
Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2011
- Messages
- 256
thanx fartknocker
Plus rep for saying "fartknocker"
FindLiberty
Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2007
- Messages
- 5,439
Last edited:
jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 51,901
When I was 11 (back in 1970s) we just got color TV. The porn magazines were on the top shelf of the magazine rack at grocery stores and drug stores. Supposedly they were "out of reach" of children.
That's one area where our society has actually gotten better. (The convenience stores around here that do carry Playboy and Penthouse have them behind the checkout counter and/or wrapped up.)
Last edited:
ninepointfive
Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2008
- Messages
- 3,134
my favorite google image search is "bend over" try it.
Barrex
Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2011
- Messages
- 3,576
When was that? When dinosaurs walked on earth?
Sorry I simply couldnt resist.
In 19th century it was obscene/pornographic to say "chicken breast".
I dont believe for a second that porn or anything else for that matter will ever be that hard to find on the internet....
presence
Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2011
- Messages
- 19,330
Then who decides what is and isn't porn; what has to and doesn't have to be .xxx? .gov?
Confederate
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 2,879
Not the kind you like.
liberty2897
Member
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2011
- Messages
- 1,147
I don't *even* want to know what .gov porn would be. That kind of shit gives me nightmares.
presence
Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2011
- Messages
- 19,330
how would you know?
Well this morning for example...
12th result under google image keyword search:
"drywall mud bucket"
I was looking for this image:
Confederate
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 2,879
hahahaha, i got the same result
NorfolkPCSolutions
Member
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2011
- Messages
- 1,580
lol, porn
L
LibForestPaul
Guest
So they leave a pookie (porn cookie) on you machine.
Now we have corporations wanting to play Mommy? Perhaps they should make parental controls for the PC like they have on TV's and cable services etc for those same people.
Let them "buy" their stupid sensors. Don't confine my searches to meet the desires of some other persons value system. Let them put a device on their router or PC. Then instead of defining porn for the entire planet every person can basque in the warm glow that nobody my sneak in a picture to their PC they may interpret as "dirty". They can "define" their own porn through a software package they buy. Let them screen themselves or they will never be satisfied because the degrees of hypersensitivity and definition of offensive etc are simply too great for any one size fits all screen to work. The screen limiting would wind up in favor of the largest group whining the most.
Once you go down this road of "blocking" things for the "good of all" be careful what you ask for. This is for the most part another example of the encroaching visibility of "mob rule". Simply by being a larger force of people their desires will be endlessly forced on the individual.
After they sensor "porn"........... what is next? How about political views they find offensive that do not align with their "value system" etc? How about guns? Be very careful opening this door.
Let them "buy" their stupid sensors. Don't confine my searches to meet the desires of some other persons value system. Let them put a device on their router or PC. Then instead of defining porn for the entire planet every person can basque in the warm glow that nobody my sneak in a picture to their PC they may interpret as "dirty". They can "define" their own porn through a software package they buy. Let them screen themselves or they will never be satisfied because the degrees of hypersensitivity and definition of offensive etc are simply too great for any one size fits all screen to work. The screen limiting would wind up in favor of the largest group whining the most.
Once you go down this road of "blocking" things for the "good of all" be careful what you ask for. This is for the most part another example of the encroaching visibility of "mob rule". Simply by being a larger force of people their desires will be endlessly forced on the individual.
After they sensor "porn"........... what is next? How about political views they find offensive that do not align with their "value system" etc? How about guns? Be very careful opening this door.
Last edited:
compromise
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2012
- Messages
- 5,516
This is a ridiculous libertine post. Google are a private company, not the government. They are just trying to stop people searching for normal things finding porn by accident.
When someone lacks any meaningful information to counter an opinion or fact they either go with "hate, religion, or political affiliation". I have no political affiliation or any of the others but feel free to lob out your unfounded opinions and categorizations.
Like many posters have said........... define "porn". Are you going to? Am I? A woman? A man? A pastor? A religious zealot? A 22 year old bar hopper? A swimsuit model? Someone 21 or 81?..... I can't believe you do not understand there is no one size fits all definition nor will there ever be.
Censoring is.... simply censoring. Someone else you don't even know will decide what you can see based on their personal opinion, life history age, value system and everything else in THEIR life. Sorry.... I got a problem with that. You may not mind being spoon fed information from other people but I do.
You might also notice the government is deeply involved with all the "private" ISP's and other internet providing and monitoring companies. I do however have the ability as a consumer to simply move to another search engine. Google is a bit "over-connected" to other sites and organizations for me at this point anyways.
Last edited:
Similar threads
