FreedomWon
Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2007
- Messages
- 153
GOOD ARTICLE -Fox News is in for a very rough 2008
- Thread starter FreedomWon
- Start date
AlexMerced
Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2007
- Messages
- 7,373
that was a great read
hillertexas
Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2007
- Messages
- 5,933
nice
Goldwater Conservative
Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2007
- Messages
- 1,783
The only thing that would have made the article better is that picture of Fox blatantly censoring Ron Paul from the Nevada results.
WilliamC
Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2007
- Messages
- 6,682
Now where were all those Fox News email addressess? I wonder if they would like to get a copy of this article in their inbox 
To e-mail to Faux News (They Distort, We the People Decide):
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
To e-mail to Faux News (They Distort, We the People Decide):
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
pacelli
Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2007
- Messages
- 11,161
I'm learning this anonymous linking thing, please bear with me. Here's an anonymous link to digg the article.
http://anonym.to/?http://digg.com/politics/Prediction_Fox_News_is_in_for_a_very_rough_2008
http://anonym.to/?http://digg.com/politics/Prediction_Fox_News_is_in_for_a_very_rough_2008
mysticgeek
Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2008
- Messages
- 652
great article
itshappening
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2007
- Messages
- 12,355
you're so right.
LONG call to FCC
Well, I just had a really LONG talk with a supervisor at FCC. She tried to give me the 1st Amendment stuff--I told her the FCC was organized AFTER that constitutional amendment was, and that there was a REASON my tax dollars were funding it. I quoted their laws to her. I requested their definition of an "editorial". (They could not give me one, so I gave them mine, and told them ALL the stations had violated sending the three things to other candidates after one). I asked HER if she has seen anything about RP in print or on TV or radio. I asked her to ask her friends at work if they had (she admitted she had not). She asked me if we had called or written the stations. I told her NUMEROUS times and we had gotten different answers but RP still not listed in their election stuff. I told her the World was looking at this obvious manipulation unfavorably. I asked her what are they DOING to help the Public?
She asked me for the numbers of different rules I was citing. SHe promised me to refer this to their legal dept. I told her the FCC blew off a legitimate complaint from Kucinich already, and that was WRONG for the American People. I asked her to follow up, and ask the legal dept. to SEARCH and find ANY WAY that this horrible manipulation could be fought by the FCC because the big picture is that OUR 1st amendment rights are being denied. SHe said she would. I do not know.
Well, I just had a really LONG talk with a supervisor at FCC. She tried to give me the 1st Amendment stuff--I told her the FCC was organized AFTER that constitutional amendment was, and that there was a REASON my tax dollars were funding it. I quoted their laws to her. I requested their definition of an "editorial". (They could not give me one, so I gave them mine, and told them ALL the stations had violated sending the three things to other candidates after one). I asked HER if she has seen anything about RP in print or on TV or radio. I asked her to ask her friends at work if they had (she admitted she had not). She asked me if we had called or written the stations. I told her NUMEROUS times and we had gotten different answers but RP still not listed in their election stuff. I told her the World was looking at this obvious manipulation unfavorably. I asked her what are they DOING to help the Public?
She asked me for the numbers of different rules I was citing. SHe promised me to refer this to their legal dept. I told her the FCC blew off a legitimate complaint from Kucinich already, and that was WRONG for the American People. I asked her to follow up, and ask the legal dept. to SEARCH and find ANY WAY that this horrible manipulation could be fought by the FCC because the big picture is that OUR 1st amendment rights are being denied. SHe said she would. I do not know.
Similar threads
