So buying gold as a store of value seems unlikely to actually result in a gain for the person doing it.
It's not supposed to result in a gain (even though it can). It's supposed to hedge against a deliberately inflicted exchange-value-of-currency-loss. And the "store of value" component is a separate issue from the medium of exchange mechanism convenience for day to day trade. Savings in PM's is always from budget surpluses, not day to day expenses. Obviously, it is not efficient to exchange currency for gold for day to day needs you have now.
What I mean by end game is literally the end result of buying and storing gold. Because right now buying and storing huge amounts of gold seems as crazy as buying a car when you live somewhere with no roads.
It is crazy, if you're at a point where you have no surplus, but still wanted to prepare for a loss of value (or availability) of the currency. In such a case, storage of food, water, energy, etc., makes far more sense than gold, because these are all things
that come from your existing budget, regardless of surpluses, that you will consume anyway. And just to acknowledge, you said as much:
"To your point on storing food and non-perishables, I can see the end result there. You store food now and upkeep it in the long run in case there is ever a shortage."
People exclaim that they are preparing for an economic collapse, with whatever that entails, (hyper-inflation, food shortages, etc) by buying gold. But currently there is no real system in place to accept gold as a form of exchange in a day to day environment, and more than likely even if the dollar collapses there will be a new paper (or maybe completely digital) currency that takes it place.
Again, see the emphasis added. Buying gold and/or silver at this point (for those who actually have budget surpluses) is not about ease of exchange or rapid liquidity for purchasing day to day needs. It's about
storing and preserving value in exchange only. The fact that it might be useful or valuable for
direct barter (using that term loosely) is only an added plus.
If there's a dollar collapse, history proves and it is an extremely safe bet, that whatever the "new paper" (or whatever) that takes its place will be of even less value to begin with, as everyone takes a massive haircut. You don't get that new currency out of thin air. It's not dropped from Ben's helicopters. You can only get it by a) your connection to its supply spigots, or b) earning it from those fortunate enough to be close to the supply spigots, or c) trading in your old currency at some horrifically low exchange rate, or d) selling something of real value in exchange. And out of the last two, what do you think is more advantageous: selling something of real value, or selling the old worthless currency that has already lost its value and is about to go defunct?