helmuth_hubener
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Messages
- 9,484
It is a simple conflict-of-interest scandal at a company called Barclays.
My point is simple. It is this:
The gold market is too big to manipulate. Long-term, and even medium-term (week/month), and usually even short-term (intra-day), the global price of gold will always be the correct market price.
This scandal was, in fact, no exception. Barclays is part of the market. So they were placing a bunch of sell orders in tactically-timed bursts. So what? Nothing wrong with that. People should be free to but and sell whatever they want whenever they want. And did this practice "manipulate" the market in any effective way? No. What would the gold price be today had they not been doing these antics? The same as it is today! It didn't change the price.
The only reason that this was a problem was because they were engaged in conflicts of interest, for example: carrying options contracts for particular gold prices and trying to change the price just barely enough for just long enough so that they wouldn't have to pay out. That is a violation of the options contract, and besides is just bad form.
But it didn't change the gold price for any significant period of time nor to any significant degree. The dollar amounts involved were far too small.