helmuth_hubener
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Messages
- 9,484
Right, definitely. Invest in gold in 1970? Good. 1980? Bad. 1990? Bad again, as you say. 2000? Good. 2010? Time will tell. Not looking so good lately.But, just picking a year here, if someone had $1000 to invest in 1990 and opted for a basket of S&P stocks, and continually re-invested dividends, they'd have a whole helluvalot more money now than someone who bought a couple ounces of gold. It wouldn't even be close.
Gold does well under certain economic conditions: namely, high-inflation. Other times, it's probably going to be in the dog house.
The thing to realize is that no asset does well all the time.
It is foolish to think that any investment portfolio is going to be the secret to becoming Uncle Moneybags. Uncle Moneybags becomes Uncle Moneybags via his career. Probably via having an equity stake in his career. That's where the bags of money come from. A portfolio is just a place to keep the bags of money safe and sound, and maybe growing at a moderate rate. But you are absolutely, absolutely right: it doesn't make you rich. No one invests 1000 dollars and ends up with a million. It simply does not happen.I definitely think that a person should invest in some commodities and that gold is a valid choice, but to think it should be the foundation of any portfolio or that it is some secret to becoming Uncle Moneybags is foolish.