You know what? That's a good question. Answering that would require reading through the pleadings in all of the lawsuits. But in all the cases the Plaintiffs ultimately lost. If Trump was arguing the same issue that Gore lost on one could argue that there was less of a reason to hear the Trump lawsuits because the issue was already decided. But from my understanding the issues being argued were quite different. I agree with Rand that the fraud question needs to be further scrutinized.
Fully agree with the "understand what you're trying to accomplish" part of it. There are all sorts of real issues to address from the fact that in 2019 prominent Democrats were raising concerns about Dominion voting machines to the question of why Pennsylvania did away with the signature verification rule for absentee voting.
Yeah...I'm kind of 3/4. There was decent evidence and I don't know if Trump's lawyers put any of that in or not but they certainly shoved some pure crap into the "kracken."
