GMO Trilogy - Unnatural Selection (part 2 of 5)

[ulsterscots]

..

 

[ulsterscots]

..

 

[ulsterscots]

..

 

[ulsterscots]

..

 

[thuja]

no way will we be intelligent and strong enough to fight for freedom unless we avoid GE/gmo at all costs.
the way to protect our planet and to help people in poorer countries is to stop GE/gmo, including their use for biofuel crops

watching these videos is the first important step to understanding the problem.here are websites for further research:

www.gmwatch.org www.biofuelwatch.org.uk

www.non-gmoreport.com www.nongmoproject.org

 

[ulsterscots]

..

 

[thuja]

good, most are unaware, which is what those corporations are relying on. i see at gmatch a few good news items about countries rejecting it again, but it's a difficult fight unless more people find out the truth.

 

[thuja]

here is another excellent place to learn about the dangers of GE/gmo:
http://www.responsibletechnology.org/GMFree/Home/index.cfm.

 

[thuja]

important story to read in order to understand the GE problem:
"Monsanto's Harvest of Fear"
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/monsanto200805

 

[thuja]

here is one of the stories about the relationship of gmo to morgellans disease that did not get stopped:
http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=6486

 

[thuja]

the above is about today's morgellans topic.

 

[Zippyjuan]

Thank you for the link.

An even more provocative finding is that biochemist Vitaly Citovsky discovered that the fibers contain a substance called "Agrobacterium," which, according to New Scientist, is "used commercially to produce genetically-modified plants." Could GM plants be "causing a new human disease?"

Agrobacterium can be used to produce GM plants but it is a naturally occuring substance and not a biproduct of GM foods.. The presence of agrobactirium does not indicate one way or the other if GM foods cause this disease since it can be found on plants which are not GM produced as well. On plants it can cause growths known as galls which are basically tumors. It was first identified around the turn of the century- not a modern creation of genetic engineering.
http://microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php/Agrobacterium

 

[thuja]

Thank you for the link.

Agrobacterium can be used to produce GM plants but it is a naturally occuring substance and not a biproduct of GM foods.. The presence of agrobactirium does not indicate one way or the other if GM foods cause this disease since it can be found on plants which are not GM produced as well. On plants it can cause growths known as galls which are basically tumors. It was first identified around the turn of the century- not a modern creation of genetic engineering.
http://microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php/Agrobacterium

thank you. that story was misleading, then, in implying agrobacterium is guilty by itself.

i wonder if you or anyone is aware of something else that may be related to such a disease and genetic modification. could it be a new type of protien that occurs as a result of GE ?
there are reports of several adverse health effects resulting from GE, but as far as the disease called morgellans, it seems people have wounds with plastic-like fibers emerging from them that are various colors including blue and red. maybe it's from some other technology, but genetic engineering is still suspect.