Global Warming; 31,487 Scientists say NO to Alarm

Background of the signees: http://www.petitionproject.org/qualifications_of_signers.php

Outlined below are the numbers of Petition Project signatories, subdivided by educational specialties. These have been combined, as indicated, into seven categories.

1. Atmospheric, environmental, and Earth sciences includes 3,805 scientists trained in specialties directly related to the physical environment of the Earth and the past and current phenomena that affect that environment.

2. Computer and mathematical sciences includes 935 scientists trained in computer and mathematical methods. Since the human-caused global warming hypothesis rests entirely upon mathematical computer projections and not upon experimental observations, these sciences are especially important in evaluating this hypothesis.

3. Physics and aerospace sciences include 5,812 scientists trained in the fundamental physical and molecular properties of gases, liquids, and solids, which are essential to understanding the physical properties of the atmosphere and Earth.

4. Chemistry includes 4,822 scientists trained in the molecular interactions and behaviors of the substances of which the atmosphere and Earth are composed.

5. Biology and agriculture includes 2,965 scientists trained in the functional and environmental requirements of living things on the Earth.

6. Medicine includes 3,046 scientists trained in the functional and environmental requirements of human beings on the Earth.

7. Engineering and general science includes 10,102 scientists trained primarily in the many engineering specialties required to maintain modern civilization and the prosperity required for all human actions, including environmental programs.
Click to expand...

Only 3,805 directly trained (according to their list) in climate change? One third engineers- plus another 3,000 in nuclear and mechanical engineering listed under "physics and aerospace"?

About half have a bachelor's degree "or equivalent" only.
 
Last edited:
Zippyjuan said:
Background of the signees: http://www.petitionproject.org/qualifications_of_signers.php



Only 3,805 directly trained (according to their list) in climate change? One third engineers- plus another 3,000 in nuclear and mechanical engineering listed under "physics and aerospace"?

About half have a bachelor's degree "or equivalent" only.
Click to expand...

zip, as I sir here drinking beer and breathing... (both activities emit CO2) I do not find sound counsel in your words of wisdom.

IF you know what HVAC/R is... then you would understand that it is necessary for me to know what "air" is.
the "V' letter stands for ventilation. is it possible to "condition" air. if one does not know what it is?

is CO2 a component of "air" zip? and if so, what do you think I do with it when the levels get too high?
and how would that ever happen in the first place? :confused:
 
Terrestrial Atmosphere
Surface pressure: 1014 mb
Surface density: 1.217 kg/m3
Scale height: 8.5 km
Total mass of atmosphere: 5.1 x 1018 kg
Total mass of hydrosphere: 1.4 x 1021 kg
Average temperature: 288 K (15 C)
Diurnal temperature range: 283 K to 293 K (10 to 20 C)
Wind speeds: 0 to 100 m/s
Mean molecular weight: 28.97 g/mole

Atmospheric composition (by volume, dry air):

Major : 78.084% Nitrogen (N2), 20.946% Oxygen (O2),

Minor (ppm): Argon (Ar) - 9340; Carbon Dioxide (CO2) - 400 :p :rolleyes:

Neon (Ne) - 18.18; Helium (He) - 5.24; CH4 - 1.7

Krypton (Kr) - 1.14; Hydrogen (H2) - 0.55

Water is highly variable, typically makes up about 1% (~10,000 ppm)

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/earthfact.html
 
Last edited:
Watch the presentation to understand why it is disingenuous when climate change alarmists claim 97% of scientist agree in man made global warming.

Moreover, the current totals of 31,487 signers, including 9,029 PhDs, are limited only by Petition Project resources. With more funds for printing and postage, these numbers would be much higher.
Click to expand...
 
Who has more of a chance of being trustworthy, 31,487 scientists from various fields of study and expertise OR 31,487 politicians?
 
Zippyjuan said:
Background of the signees: http://www.petitionproject.org/qualifications_of_signers.php



Only 3,805 directly trained (according to their list) in climate change? One third engineers- plus another 3,000 in nuclear and mechanical engineering listed under "physics and aerospace"?

About half have a bachelor's degree "or equivalent" only.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes: Wrong Zippy.

3. Physics and aerospace sciences include 5,812 scientists trained in the fundamental physical and molecular properties of gases, liquids, and solids, which are essential to understanding the physical properties of the atmosphere and Earth.

4. Chemistry includes 4,822 scientists trained in the molecular interactions and behaviors of the substances of which the atmosphere and Earth are composed.

5. Biology and agriculture includes 2,965 scientists trained in the functional and environmental requirements of living things on the Earth.

6. Medicine includes 3,046 scientists trained in the functional and environmental requirements of human beings on the Earth.
 
It all* has to do with energy coming from the sun and how it interacts with the Earth!

Try to remember that after the next ice age...


*(99.99999999%)
 
Danke said:
Watch the presentation to understand why it is disingenuous when climate change alarmists claim 97% of scientist agree in man made global warming.
Click to expand...

Danke KNOWS what the single largest "global warming gas" is. :p

and is acutely aware of it's shenanigans.. he deals with it on every flight. :)
 
Zippyjuan said:
Background of the signees: http://www.petitionproject.org/qualifications_of_signers.php

Only 3,805 directly trained (according to their list) in climate change? One third engineers- plus another 3,000 in nuclear and mechanical engineering listed under "physics and aerospace"?

About half have a bachelor's degree "or equivalent" only.
Click to expand...

Rather than a drive by posting calling the educational legitimacy of these people into question, why not address the larger question.

Is global warming the result of man's influence?

What regulations/restrictions do you propose/support if that is the case.
 
I am going to wait on word from Al Fore with the inconvenient truth.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Occam's Banana
"Dark money" group secretly funding high-profile Democrat "influencers"?
Replies
12
Views
50
TheTexan
TheTexan
Occam's Banana
Politics and violence
Replies
9
Views
112
ClaytonB
ClaytonB
PAF
Candace Owens - The Epstein Files; Dead Men Tell No Tales
Replies
4
Views
51
Anti Globalist
Anti Globalist
Occam's Banana
The funeral of Ben Shapiro
Replies
4
Views
63
vita3
V
PAF
Whitney Webb Explains What Trump is Hiding From the Epstein Files
Replies
2
Views
70
unknown
unknown
Back
Top