Glen Beck Explains Himself and Answers his Critics

Thank you Glen Beck !!

We will use you until you reveal your true agenda. You aren't fooling a bunch of people.
 
Something in common with Howard Beale: They're both actors following a script.

It's FOX news for crying out loud. Beck is not an independent agency.

It's the same fucking oligarchy that decided to demonize Ron Paul in 2007.
 
This is fantsastic.

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/24/beck-slavery/


After watching these two vids, I think I'm a convert now and in future will be questioning people who say Glenn has mental health issues.

Beck is actually right, but there wasn't a valid reason why any boots should have landed there to begin with. Whats horrible is opening up these theater of operations in these hellholes and leaving a power vacuum. It s completely irresponsible. Ron Paul was the only one with the foresight to see this, by voting against the war from the beginning.
 
Last edited:
Something in common with Howard Beale: They're both actors following a script.

It's FOX news for crying out loud. Beck is not an independent agency.

It's the same fucking oligarchy that decided to demonize Ron Paul in 2007.

he's a transfer from CNN/headline news. He has the unenviable 5 pm time slot for Christ's sake. I wouldn't ever consider him part of the stable. Ailes keeps him around for giggles. If he replaces O'Reilly you could be onto something, but until then your theory is just that.
 
Last edited:
he's a transfer from CNN/headline news. He has the 5 pm time slot for Christ's sake. I wouldn't ever consider him part of the stable. Ailes keeps him around for giggles. If he replaces O'Reilly you could be onto something but until then your theory is just that.

You think they just hand out hourly shows at FOX?

Of course it is all planned out.
 
You think they just hand out hourly shows at FOX?

Of course it is all planned out.

Anything for ratings. Sell advertising. Fox would push liberal talk if it sold.
 
You think they just hand out hourly shows at FOX?

Of course it is all planned out.


Probably not. Do you think Judge Napolitano is a phony and all his appearances are staged/planned and his "Freedom Watch" is a farse? That's all on Fox too.
 
Probably not. Do you think Judge Napolitano is a phony and all his appearances are staged/planned and his "Freedom Watch" is a farse? That's all on Fox too.

That's an internet show.

They won't ever give him an hour show on national tv. Ever.
 
Beck is actually right, but there wasn't a valid reason why any boots should have landed there to begin with. Whats horrible is opening up these theater of operations in these hellholes and leaving a power vacuum. It s completely irresponsible. Ron Paul was the only one with the foresight to see this, by voting against the war from the beginning.

Uh...no. He's not. Not on Iraq. The Iraqi people don't want us there. (That's why Obama is "drawing down" troops by 2011. ) We don't solve problems by compounding the same mistakes. Sure we shouldn't have invaded in the first place. But we can't stay there indefinitely just to prove we are "moral".

Back to the thread, I'm glad Beck is speaking out. But I'm waiting to see if he's willing to admit where he was wrong over the past 8 years.
 
Uh...no. He's not. Not on Iraq. The Iraqi people don't want us there. (That's why Obama is "drawing down" troops by 2011. ) We don't solve problems by compounding the same mistakes. Sure we shouldn't have invaded in the first place. But we can't stay there indefinitely just to prove we are "moral".

I agree about the indefinite timeline. However, you can't simply leave a country rudderless, with rival factions terrorizing the populace, after you dispose of their government. You have to leave some semblance of order, even if it is not a functional democracy.
 
I agree about the indefinite timeline. However, you can't simply leave a country rudderless, with rival factions terrorizing the populace, after you dispose of their government. You have to leave some semblance of order, even if it is not a functional democracy.

And how many years does that take? Two? Four? Eight? Fifty? The problem isn't leaving a "semblance of order". That would have happened years ago if we had pulled out. It just wouldn't have been OUR order. But that doesn't mean it wouldn't have fit the needs of the Iraqi people. Just look at what happened in Somalia. After we pulled out (which was the RIGHT thing to do) a government eventually formed and there was a brief respite of peace. But the government wasn't to our liking so we funded the Ethiopians (who are barely able to feed themselves) to go in and destabalize (excuse me "bring freedom") to the country. Now its back in shambles. Sorry. Becks still wrong. Ron was right. We should have pulled out of Iraq yesterday. We're merely delaying the inevitable. That is the creation of a stable government that is not friendly to us.
 
Back
Top