Gingrich: "History will recognize Ron Paul" as "first serious national leader" on Fed

I told my sons twenty or thirty years from now people will talk about Ron Paul Republicans the way we calk about Goldwater Republicans now. If we are not living in a complete 1984 society, I have no question that he will be regarded as one of the most important political figures of the last century.
 
I told my sons twenty or thirty years from now people will talk about Ron Paul Republicans the way we calk about Goldwater Republicans now. If we are not living in a complete 1984 society, I have no question that he will be regarded as one of the most important political figures of the last century.

That's the problem. For many of us, it's 1776 or 1984. And if Ron Paul doesn't win, I daresay he eventually gets erased from the history books as we descend into further madness as a totalarian society. Sure, people would still whisper his name amongst themselves (the ones still awake), but over time and generations, he'd basically become some bastardized mix of Guy Fawkes and Emmanuel Goldstein. How depressing.
 
Mandate Gingrich is banking on Ron losing and bleeding supporters. He is already using some of Ron's talking points so this is a smart move to pickup some of our ignorant supporters.

Bad move on his part. Poeple who are political drones dont support Paul. I dont think thats what he's going for
 
Newt has been setting himself up this whole time to get a cabinet position for whoever is elected.
 
That, along with the income tax question (How much of every dollar I make should I be allowed to keep?), was fucking ridiculous. How the hell can Blitzer call himself a fair moderator after that?

Blitzer can just make the "Adolf Eichmann plea" - I was just doing what my superiors told me to do.
 
Bad move on his part. Poeple who are political drones dont support Paul. I dont think thats what he's going for

Well, let's see, I just retweeted something Newt said. As did many. Most of my twitter followers are not necessarily ron paul supporters. What that retweet says, if they
read it correctly, is ron paul people just liked something Newt said. If they don't read it close - they see newt and ron paul. This is a very easy way for Newt to get a whole bunch of retweets, by people he knows will retweet anything nice anybody ever says about Ron Paul without fully thinking about it.
 
Well, let's see, I just retweeted something Newt said. As did many. Most of my twitter followers are not necessarily ron paul supporters. What that retweet says, if they
read it correctly, is ron paul people just liked something Newt said. If they don't read it close - they see newt and ron paul. This is a very easy way for Newt to get a whole bunch of retweets, by people he knows will retweet anything nice anybody ever says about Ron Paul without fully thinking about it.

It's also a good way to get Newt-worshippers to pay attention to Ron Paul. They might just like what they see.
 
That, along with the income tax question (How much of every dollar I make should I be allowed to keep?), was fucking ridiculous. How the hell can Blitzer call himself a fair moderator after that?
lolz! If there was any doubt that the MSM is extraordinarily biased and corrupt, this series of "debates" (so-called) alone could take care of that.
 
Back
Top