Feeding the Abscess
Member
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2010
- Messages
- 8,340
I take it they didn't see this image?
![]()
Is 'Dee-Dee' Rachel Jeantel?
I take it they didn't see this image?
![]()
The key word. Show us a known fact.I stand corrected, thanks. He wasn't wearing shorts but the hands would still be visible in a well lit street. I believe he knew he was black and with the recent problems they've had with black robbers, he decided to profile this black stranger. But Stephan in his analysis is claiming that there is no way George could have profiled Trayvon and this is because George has black friends.
The key word. Show us a known fact.
Don't matter, facts show who was getting the shit kicked out him. It wasn't Martin.I will just as soon as you show me the fact that points to Travon initiating the altercation. Ofc its speculation seeing as non of us were there when it happened.
That says all there need to be said why this case was so overblown."We should ask ourselves if we're doing all we can to stem the tide of gun violence that claims too many lives across this country on a daily basis," Obama said.
Don't matter, facts show who was getting the shit kicked out him. It wasn't Martin.
You don't understand the law. It does not matter who started a fight, once one side or the other comes to the conclusion they are no longer in a ordinary fight and they feel they will die by the end they have the right to use whatever force is required to save their life. If both Zim and Martin both had the equivalent wounds it could be argued that ZiM really didn't fear for his life and just wanted to kill Martin.Is that a fact? cos I would like to see where its written that getting you head bashed in is a sign that one did not initiate a fight. But we can speculate that Travvon probably started the fight when you consider his history with fights and the fact that he left the house and then came back out. Those are facts that can lead one to safely conclusion that Travon most likely started the fight
By the same token, we know the neighbourhood had experienced a rash of robberies committed by black people and Zimmerman as a neighbourhood watchman must have been looking out for the people who did this. Travon was walking on a well lit street with his hands exposed and Zimmerman was in his car with headlights on and from these facts, I can safely conclude that Zimmerman could tell that he was black.
And a person as smart as Stephan should know this, but in his zeal to paint Zimmerman as an angelic figure would never ever think of profiling people based on race, something we all do on different levels both positively or negatively in our daily lives led him to miss it.
You don't understand the law. It does not matter who started a fight, once one side or the other comes to the conclusion they are no longer in a ordinary fight and they feel they will die by the end they have the right to use whatever force is required to save their life. If both Zim and Martin both had the equivalent wounds it could be argued that ZiM really didn't fear for his life and just wanted to kill Martin.
You don't understand the law. It does not matter who started a fight, once one side or the other comes to the conclusion they are no longer in a ordinary fight and they feel they will die by the end they have the right to use whatever force is required to save their life. If both Zim and Martin both had the equivalent wounds it could be argued that ZiM really didn't fear for his life and just wanted to kill Martin.
We are Zim's wounds versus Marten's.Law? I thought we were talking about facts?
We are Zim's wounds versus Marten's.
Is 'Dee-Dee' Rachel Jeantel?
And once again wounds are facts.Remember, you were the one who came at me with "show me the facts?" I already agree with you that Zimmerman most likely initiated the attack, I was just pointing to you that you also dont have the facts , all you have is Zimmerman words and history/behaviour that point to Travvon being the attackers.
And once again wounds are facts.
And? its also a fact that Travvon was killed night, it still not a fact as to who started the fight. The hard fact I would to get from you is the one that shows Travvon starting the fight and remember, not one that shows that Travvon beat George up or any other irrelevant side facts. But I am asking cos I know you dont have it, we both used the same method to come to our conclusions but you choose to criticize me by claiming I had no facts when no of us did.
You start sounding like this when you let your opinion become influenced by mainstream media propaganda.
Not really, its more like you showing your bias. Read up on the reply and see how he was the one who challenged to show the facts in order to discredit me when he did not have facts on his prove Travvon started the fight. And how exactly did you come to the conclusion that I am being influenced by MSM propaganda?
ok ill tell you what. come to my place at night where you shouldnt be and see if i dont follow your ass until you leave or give me a damn good well mannered reason for being there. if you convince me ill go home. if not, ill stay right there until the cops come and ask you what the hell youre doing there. and if you punch me, ill try my best to whip your ass until the threat is done. am i supposed to just lay in wait until you have your way with me? come on man.,