Michele Bachmann Gay barbarians descend on Marcus and Michele Bachmann’s clinic

reduen

Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2007
Messages
3,359
Gay barbarians descend on Marcus and Michele Bachmann’s clinic

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/was...nic-glittered-by-horde-of-gay-barbarians.html

A horde of glitter-wielding gay "barbarians" on Thursday paid a visit to a clinic owned by GOP presidential candidate Michele Bachmann and her husband, Marcus.

The colorfully dressed group had scheduled an appointment at Bachmann & Associates and were demanding to be disciplined.

The barbarians appeared to be taking Marcus up on his belief that gays and lesbians are in need of "discipline"to remedy their "sinful nature," a philosophy he espoused over a year ago on a Christian radio show.
 
Rofl, ill bet they brought whips to be disciplined with and everything :D
 
Here is the vid:



Edit: He is getting off lucky here, at least they did not pull a bruno on him like they did our man...
 
Last edited:
I would bet my left nut that Marcus is actually a closeted gay. He has the facial structure. voice, and dance style movements. It's been scientifically proven people can spot a gay person based on sight. Also he has to have some sort of passion for this otherwise he would never start a gay healing clinic. He's obviously repressed and this is how he deals with it, regardless of how destructive it is.

Suppose you see a bird walking around in a farm yard. This bird has no label that says 'duck'. But the bird certainly looks like a duck. Also, he goes to the pond and you notice that he swims like a duck. Then he opens his beak and quacks like a duck. Well, by this time you have probably reached the conclusion that the bird is a duck, whether he's wearing a label or not.
 
A "gay healing clinic" would be a great place to meet gay people without jeapordizing your spouse's political career.
 
I would bet my left nut that Marcus is actually a closeted gay. He has the facial structure. voice, and dance style movements. It's been scientifically proven people can spot a gay person based on sight..

If you're talking about the same test I'm thinking of, the methodology is flawed, and the test actually proved no such thing. I still maintain that it is impossible to determine if a person is gay just by looking at or talking to them. (That's been the politically correct meme up until now that the left needs it to change.)

As for the original post - I think they're proving his point. Dumbasses.
 
A "gay healing clinic" would be a great place to meet gay people without jeapordizing your spouse's political career.

It's also a great place to help people that want to resist urges in themselves they find unacceptable. Nobody is forcing people to go there.

People, we are or should be better than this.
 
It's also a great place to help people that want to resist urges in themselves they find unacceptable. Nobody is forcing people to go there.

People, we are or should be better than this.


Thank you for saying this. How anyone could think otherwise boggles the mind....
 
It's also a great place to help people that want to resist urges in themselves they find unacceptable. Nobody is forcing people to go there.

People, we are or should be better than this.

Point of clarification. "We" haven't had anything to do with this. ;) That said, both sides are ridiculous. Marcus for using the term "barbarians" and the gay protesters for acting that way. When Christ ministered to the woman caught in adultery He didn't say "Come here you barbarian whore!" You don't have to insult someone just to reach out to them.
 
I would bet my left nut that Marcus is actually a closeted gay. He has the facial structure. voice, and dance style movements. It's been scientifically proven people can spot a gay person based on sight. Also he has to have some sort of passion for this otherwise he would never start a gay healing clinic. He's obviously repressed and this is how he deals with it, regardless of how destructive it is.

Suppose you see a bird walking around in a farm yard. This bird has no label that says 'duck'. But the bird certainly looks like a duck. Also, he goes to the pond and you notice that he swims like a duck. Then he opens his beak and quacks like a duck. Well, by this time you have probably reached the conclusion that the bird is a duck, whether he's wearing a label or not.

+1
 
If you're talking about the same test I'm thinking of, the methodology is flawed, and the test actually proved no such thing. I still maintain that it is impossible to determine if a person is gay just by looking at or talking to them. (That's been the politically correct meme up until now that the left needs it to change.)

As for the original post - I think they're proving his point. Dumbasses.

http://www.tuftsdaily.com/gay-and-straight-ph-d-student-learns-rules-1.74492626
I guess science isn't my strong suit so I can't really comment on methodology too much. It did seem pretty convincing though. I can't find the original one I read prior but it involved women since they are equipped to look men over, evolutionarily speaking. So being able to spot a gay man would be beneficial. I think the theory is that gay men are exposed to different levels of hormones while in the womb and so that will eventually affect their face as they grow up. I also read a theory that since they are gay, they have different facial expressions so using those muscles constantly will also affect their overall facial look.

For over 3 years I've had to regularly take trips up to Ogunquit, ME for work. It's one of the gay capitals of the world. They look different to me. This is my opinion so I'm not using this to make a point.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
I would bet my left nut that Marcus is actually a closeted gay. He has the facial structure. voice, and dance style movements. It's been scientifically proven people can spot a gay person based on sight. Also he has to have some sort of passion for this otherwise he would never start a gay healing clinic. He's obviously repressed and this is how he deals with it, regardless of how destructive it is.

Suppose you see a bird walking around in a farm yard. This bird has no label that says 'duck'. But the bird certainly looks like a duck. Also, he goes to the pond and you notice that he swims like a duck. Then he opens his beak and quacks like a duck. Well, by this time you have probably reached the conclusion that the bird is a duck, whether he's wearing a label or not.

This is absolutely ludicrous. Gays are not like black people where their "gayness" is immediately recognizable. It's not a physical trait. It's a mental thing. Also, it is really terrible that you promote this propaganda that those who oppose homosexuality based on its sinful nature are also homosexuals. It's like saying that, because I oppose stealing since it is a sin, that I am a closeted thief that has a deep affinity for thievery and I am just suppressing it. Also, this idea of "suppression" is such Freudian nonsense and has been dismissed as an old-age concept.

The whole anti-anti-gay movement has simply been a battle of trying to misrepresent those who oppose homosexuality as something they're not. Obviously, you've bought into this propaganda and continue to espouse its core principles. You don't try to have an honest conversation.
 
This is absolutely ludicrous. Gays are not like black people where their "gayness" is immediately recognizable. It's not a physical trait. It's a mental thing. Also, it is really terrible that you promote this propaganda that those who oppose homosexuality based on its sinful nature are also homosexuals. It's like saying that, because I oppose stealing since it is a sin, that I am a closeted thief that has a deep affinity for thievery and I am just suppressing it. Also, this idea of "suppression" is such Freudian nonsense and has been dismissed as an old-age concept.

The whole anti-anti-gay movement has simply been a battle of trying to misrepresent those who oppose homosexuality as something they're not. Obviously, you've bought into this propaganda and continue to espouse its core principles. You don't try to have an honest conversation.

Look, I've brought the study that says it can be seen physically. Now you and another person are refuting this and I even humbly claimed my ignorance on the intricacies of scientific methodology.

Remember my "duck" analogy? I'm not saying everyone who opposes homosexuality are homosexuals. I'm saying in this one specific case of a person with all these traits adds up to a homosexual. If he just walks like a duck is not enough to conclude anything, but when you add quacking, swimming, and appearance...well...

Suppression simply means you know it's there but you don't act on it. I don't know how you can say that people don't do that. It's a very basic thing.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top