This interview is so full of missed opportunities it is painful to watch.
I'm writing in Ron Paul, again.
What else would you have suggested Gary Johnson say to a liberal audience with a liberal talk show host to get them to seriously consider voting for him instead of Hillary?
Those are pretty good. Thanks.
But I think he laid out the main points well. He gave common sense answers in an amenable way and probably came across as somebody the crowd could get along with. They might have been expecting more of a get-off-my-lawn libertarian message.
But I'm most interested in that ending. War is as close as I get to a "single issue."
What else would you have suggested Gary Johnson say to a liberal audience with a liberal talk show host to get them to seriously consider voting for him instead of Hillary?
The truth?
How about he tells the truth about where his views come from? If Ron Paul was doing that interview, he would have said, "Constitution" at least five times. His comment about war was two sentences. That's not passionately delivered. It certainly was not the first thing on his list of things to talk about.
Gary Johnson said:Our military should remain the most potent force for good on Earth. To do this, we should resort to military action as the last option and only as provided in the Constitution.
Bring the Troops Home
AMERICAN MILITARY ACTIVITIES IN IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN, AND, now, Libya should end, our troops returned home, and the focus of our foreign policy reoriented toward the protection of U.S. citizens and interests.
* With Osama bin Laden now killed and after 10 years of fighting, U.S. forces should leave Afghanistan's challenges to the Afghan people.
* Saddam Hussein has been out of power in Iraq for nearly eight years. America must leave so Iraq can have a chance to grow into a responsible member of the world community.
* Without a clear goal for our military actions in Libya, fighting rages on, and the American people are footing the bill.
* Decades after the collapse of the Soviet Union, American troops remain scattered throughout Europe. It is time to reevaluate these deployments.
* The U.S. must make better use of military alliances which allow greater sharing of the human and financial burdens at less cost of protecting national interests.
What's good to note, however, is Gary finally going with the non-aggression principle. Often he'd start with the whole "fiscally conservative, socially liberal" schtick. I think the non-aggression principle is a better tagline and message to summarize libertarianism.