Gary Johnson Gary Johnson could cost Romney the presidency (Ohio)

[The Goat]

Republicans tomorrow. XD

 

[Ronulus]

To be honest, if we are choosing between which path to destruction we prefer. I prefer the one that gets us there faster.

Get it over with, and then we can start over.

 

[NoOneButPaul]

PLEASE PLEASE PPPLLLLEASE Let this happen.

Johnson winning Ohio would look fantastic for us... automatically we could say Ron Paul would have won that state... but beside that it shows the GOP that discount our numbers that they actually do matter no matter how small they think they are.

 

[FrancisMarion]

Gary Johnson Voters could cost Romney the presidency (Ohio)

 

[acptulsa]

Actually, it's very simple. Romney cost Romney the election, just as everyone with a lick of sense knew he would. Furthermore, those members of the GOP who nominated Romney cost the GOP the election, because they didn't have a lick of sense.

"You can't beat an administration by attacking it. You have to show some plan of improving on it."--Will Rogers 1924

And you don't improve on something by offering the exact same damned thing!

 

[seyferjm]

My parents (dad especially) have been giving me a lot of grief for not wanting to vote for Romney here in Ohio. I can't get them to accept that Romney lost this election for himself. FWIW, they all voted for Paul in the primaries, but this "We have to vote Romney now" thing is killing me.

 

[itshappening]

Vote Johnson if you're in Ohio

I hope he gets a good showing there, with Obama nicely under 50 percent

 

[lx43]

My parents (dad especially) have been giving me a lot of grief for not wanting to vote for Romney here in Ohio. I can't get them to accept that Romney lost this election for himself. FWIW, they all voted for Paul in the primaries, but this "We have to vote Romney now" thing is killing me.

I know I hear this BS all the time when I'm asked who I'm voting for, I will not vote for Romney or Obama. It would be so sweet if the NOBP thing or Gary Johnson could deny Romney the Presidency.

 

[Tod]

Why do people always assume that Libertarians would have voted Republican if not for the Libertarian candidate?

Republicans at least sometimes make the pretense of being for smaller government (more liberty) even if they don't mean it.

Ron Paul ran in both Libertarian and Republican parties.

 

[torchbearer]

Republicans at least sometimes make the pretense of being for smaller government (more liberty) even if they don't mean it.

Ron Paul ran in both Libertarian and Republican parties.

Ron is a lifetime member of the Libertarian Party.

 

[Carehn]

Why do people always assume that Libertarians would have voted Republican if not for the Libertarian candidate?

Because those same people always compromise. so they assume you would if you only had less to choose from.

 

[cindy25]

don't blame GJ; Mitt could have chosen Rand for VP. and OH would not even be in play