From the ground in Huntington, WV (CD-3)

[ShaneEnochs]

It's kind of a rainy day, so there wasn't much turnout in my precinct. I did notice that there were considerably more Romney delegates than there were Paul delegates, though. It kinda had me worried...

 

[ShaneEnochs]

Also,

 

[sailingaway]

My understanding is the Romney folks put TOO MANY Romney delegates so their votes might be split.

 

[rich34]

^^This

 

[opinionatedfool]

My understanding is the Romney folks put TOO MANY Romney delegates so their votes might be split.

If WV selects delegates by ballot, that's great. I'm glad the RP team limited the number on there.

 

[MountaineerBill]

It's kind of a rainy day, so there wasn't much turnout in my precinct. I did notice that there were considerably more Romney delegates than there were Paul delegates, though. It kinda had me worried...

If you're referring the number of Romney delegates on the ballot, then that's a good thing.

There are only 3 slots per each congressional district and 19 At-large slots.

So, his delegate votes are susceptible to dilution!

We could theoretically win with way less Paul delegate votes, because there are exactly 19 Paul At-Large delegates and exactly 3 per CD. Strategically, we're better off!

So, no worries Shane...thanks for voting!

This is explained more at http://www.wv4ronpaul.com and the greenpapers has the delegate lists consolidated (http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P12/WV-R#0508).