From Russia Press..can this be true?

Well there is LOTS of radiation in places in space. The dispute in the article to me seemed to be whether we shot down our own satellite or if a meteor hit it, and really there is no way to tell that as far as I know. But if we did shoot down I would think there would be other countries reporting on it, so I say its propaganda.
 
newbitech said:
"United States Air Forces' 30th Space Wing"

let me guess, you found this on Rense.com. let this die. and please do some more research!
Click to expand...

The US does have a space branch of the military believe it or not. I have seen the general or whatever, the head guy of it on tv once before. And with all of our satellites in space, why wouldn't we have a part of our military dedicated to space now?
 
Thought I read somewhere that the now defunct Strategic Air Command morphed into a space command.
 
I'm sure its something completely and totally pointless that costs us like $8754123342334 dollars to run.
 
Pravda isn't uhhh, reliable.

Pravda has turned into the National Enquirer of Russia with a little bit of actual news mixed in. Sometimes it's legit, and some of the op-eds are worth reading for a different perspective; but Pravda also likes to make sensationalist, anti-American comments. I'm guessing that's what this is.
 
We're only one step from STARFLEET COMMAND... and then Klingons.
 
DON'T READ PRAVDA.RU - it's the russian equivalent to weekly world news ("cow gives birth to raptor alien", "america did 9/11", "tesla's generator was a time machine" kind of journalism).
 
The Military Industrial Complex is huge. Most of Congress and the President probably don't even know a quarter of what the military is actually doing.
 
From MSM: Can THIS BE True?

They [the source’s institution] have "instructions" (yes, that was the word used) from the Office of the Vice-President to roll out a campaign for war with Iran in the week after Labor Day; it will be coordinated with the American Enterprise Institute, the Wall Street Journal, the Weekly Standard, Commentary, Fox, and the usual suspects. It will be heavy sustained assault on the airwaves, designed to knock public sentiment into a position from which a war can be maintained. Evidently they don’t think they’ll ever get majority support for this—they want something like 35-40 percent support, which in their book is "plenty..."

...Postscript: Barnett Rubin just called me. His source spoke with a neocon think-tanker who corroborated the story of the propaganda campaign and had this to say about it: "I am a Republican. I am a conservative. But I’m not a raging lunatic. This is lunatic."

-Mainstream source
 
The Pravda newspaper and Pravda Online are not related in any way, although the journalists of both publications are still in touch with each other. The paper Pravda tends to analyze events from a leftist point of view, while the web-based, tabloid-style newspaper often takes a nationalist and sensationalist approach.

Source: Wikipedia
 
JustBcuz said:
Pravda isn't uhhh, reliable.

Pravda has turned into the National Enquirer of Russia with a little bit of actual news mixed in. Sometimes it's legit, and some of the op-eds are worth reading for a different perspective; but Pravda also likes to make sensationalist, anti-American comments. I'm guessing that's what this is.
Click to expand...

Is that kind of like fox news?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

osan
When Things Look Too Good To Be True.
Replies
3
Views
405
Snowball
Snowball
PAF
Putin Makes Public Peace Offer to Ukraine
Replies
6
Views
856
Pauls' Revere
Pauls' Revere
Occam's Banana
New York Times' pro-war think-tank ties exposed
Replies
0
Views
356
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Snowball
US now operating under a new, classified Nuclear Employment Guidance (NEG)
Replies
0
Views
225
Snowball
Snowball
pmbug
Anonymous, secure and auditable crypto voting
Replies
2
Views
640
ClaytonB
ClaytonB
Back
Top