Fracking Is OK, Says Buried Report From New York State's Health Department

FrankRep

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
28,885



The release of a conveniently long-lost report showing that fracking is safe puts New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo in a tight spot: continue to appease environmentalists by delaying further the development of the rich Marcellus Formation under his state, or letting the free market extract those resources and generate thousands of jobs and millions in revenue to the state.​



Fracking Is OK, Says Buried Report From New York State's Health Department


The New American
04 January 2013


A report favoring fracking that was buried for nearly a year was given to the New York Times yesterday by a whistleblower who “did not believe it should be kept secret,” according to Danny Hakim. The eight-page analysis summarizes “previous research [done] by the state and others, and concludes that fracking can be done safely.” Specifically, the report says:


By implementing the proposed mitigation measures, the Department expects that human chemical exposures during normal [fracking] operations will be prevented or reduced below levels of significant health concern.​


The report went on to say that further study of the risks would be worthless because it would “involve making a large number of assumptions about the many … variables that influence the nature and degree of potential human exposure and toxicity.”

The report puts New York Governor Andrew Cuomo (shown) in a tough spot. On one side are the landowners over the Marcellus Formation in the southwestern parts of the state who have been leasing their land to drilling companies anxious to explore the potential of the formation. On the other are the environmentalists who are concerned about the risks of such exploration and the potential impact on people and the environment.

Cuomo has delayed making a decision on whether to allow fracking for nearly four years while an environmental study was being completed. Back in September Cuomo was about to allow some limited exploring, but at the last minute, he reversed course, ordering another full-scale study of the matter, which would put off making a decision for at least another year.

This pleased Cuomo’s good friend Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., an environmental activist whose sister just happens to be Cuomo’s ex-wife. Kennedy said at the time that he was delighted with Cuomo’s continued resistance to landowners and drilling companies who wanted to get started with the drilling:


I’m surprised how long he’s withstood the tide. I’m proud that he’s done that. There’s no other governor who’s just said “let’s hold off.” And he’s under, I can tell you, tremendous pressure by the industry and by others.​


With the release of the long-buried report, that pressure is only going to increase. The Marcellus Formation is almost incomprehensibly large, extending nearly 600 miles from the Finger Lakes region of New York south and west into and through western Pennsylvania, down through Maryland and into West Virginia. When the U.S. Geological Survey studied the formation back in 2002, it concluded that, with the then-existing technology, there was 2 trillion cubic feet (TCF) available for recovery. In 2009, it revised its estimate to 262 TCF. Translated into dollars, Marcellus has about $200 billion dollars’ worth of recoverable reserves. And that, according to a study funded by the Marcellus Shale Coalition, translates into 250,000 new jobs. If Cuomo lifts the ban in drilling, Marcellus could create $11.4 billion in economic output and raise $1.4 billion in state and local taxes, according to the Manhattan Institute.

Fracking has already proven to be an important part of the U.S. economy, having created 1.7 million jobs last year alone with an additional 2.5 million jobs expected within the next three years.

The risks that the environmentalists are concerned about and are holding Cuomo hostage over are the risks that the fracking process could possibly pollute aquifers and wells. But according to Ronald Bailey at Reason magazine, the risks are minimal:


If oil and gas production actually resulted in detectable health risks, it would already be apparent. Why? Because something like 75,000 conventional oil and gas wells have been drilled in New York since the late 1800s, and 14,000 of them are still active.​


But the environmentalists aren't interested in logic or aren't listening. One of the more boisterous is Frack Free Nation, which notes its opposition on its website with the following declarations, capital letters and exclamation points included:


Criminalize Shale Gas Extraction!

Regulations DO NOT prevent pollution.

Regulations ENABLE POLLUTION!

Regulators are trained and employed to ISSUE PERMITS — for pollution!

Then they asses [sic] monitory [sic!] fines for violations and spills — if we are lucky!!...

Therefore, these permits and associated regulations are CAUSING pollution.

The FACT is that this industry has a HORRIBLE safety record, which has left a toxic legacy everywhere it has gone.

The only way to stop the violations and stop the environmental destruction is by PROHIBITION…​


Diatribes by some environmentalists remind one of the advice an old lawyer gave to his son:


If you have a case where the law is clearly on your side, but the facts and justice seem to be against you, urge upon the jury the vast importance of sustaining the law.

On the other hand, if the law is against you, or doubtful, and the facts show that your case is founded in justice, insist that justice be done though the heavens fall.

But, said the young man, how shall I manage a case where both the law and the facts are dead against me?

In that case, talk around it, and the worse it is, the harder you pound the table.​


With the release of this conveniently long-lost study, no amount of table pounding is likely to change the conclusion: Fracking is safe, and Cuomo won’t be able to delay the inevitable much longer.


Related News:

Natural Gas — Yours for the Fracking


Wresting natural gas via fracking from tight shale formations a mile underground is one of man’s greatest accomplishments, and one that promises abundant, clean fuel for a century or more.​


Natural Gas — the Coming Shale Gale


Natural gas production is now booming, thanks to new methods of obtaining gas from shale stone.​


Energy Boom Could Make U.S. Largest Oil Producer by 2020


The growing energy boom in the U.S. could make it the largest global oil producer by the end of the decade, according to a new report.​


Unconventional Oil and Gas Industry Created 1.7 Million Jobs This Year


The U.S. oil and natural-gas rush will create a total of 1.7 million jobs this year, according to a new study released Tuesday.​


Firewater and Other Urban Fracking Legends


A movie entitled Gasland claims that natural-gas drilling is polluting both water and air in the United States, even causing water to ignite, but we checked the claims.​
 
Last edited:
WOW. Cannot believe this didn't surface right before elections. This is such a hot topic in New York.
 
A movie entitled Gasland claims that natural-gas drilling is polluting both water and air in the United States, even causing water to ignite, but we checked the claims.

I know a lady who lives in the town at the beginning of this, where they lit the tap water on fire.... anyway, she said their water ignited WAY before drilling. There's just an overabundance of methane in it to begin with.
 
Garrett County, Maryland, just had a water study performed which showed elevated methane levels in domestic water wells. You WILL have methane in your water if you live in coal country, and it has been there for generations. I'm not saying that's okay, and I'm not saying that it's not. I'm just saying that they hysteria over fracking is a farce to anyone with the least common sense. It's FAR less environmentally intrucive than any method of coal mining, consumes FAR less water than coal mining, produces FAR less truck traffic per BTU than coal mining, and releases FAR fewer chemicals into the environment than coal mining. None of this is to vilify coal mining, of course. We've lived with a less advanced method of coal mining than what we're doing today for CENTURIES. All of this is to say that as relatively harmless as coal mining has been, natural gas extraction is even less so.
 
This comes to mind...

Fracking Energy Boom: MSNBC host asks -- Is Energy Becoming Too Cheap?



MSNBC host: Energy is just too darn cheap


Hot Air
December 8, 2012


MSNBC is essentially saying that cheap energy is bad because they want everyone to use expensive "Green energy."


Chris Hayes: We’re talking about the massive, extractive energy boom happening in America right now and how it’s transforming our politics and how that can be made to work with a sane climate policy, which is really the difficult question. Before the break I left the question on the table about the price of energy being too low right now. Basically we see this massive amount of supply has come onto the grid thanks largely to natural gas. The price has come down, and I think we generally think, “Oh, lower prices are better.” But it seems to me there’s a lot of problematic stuff about the price coming down sharply as it is right now in terms of incentives for efficiency and et cetera.

Dan Dicker: You would want the prices to go up a lot because it would drive the next stage towards renewables, and make that at least cost-effective. Algae fuel, we talk a lot about that…

C.H.: Some people talk about that.

D.D.: Yeah. The cost is about eight and a half to nine dollars a gallon compared to gasoline as it is now. You want the prices to go up to make these a little more cost effective. Drive the technology into them. Unfortunately it’s actually going quite the opposite. You talk about increased supply here in the United States. In fact, overseas demand is dropping. We are still in the midst of an economic problem in Europe. Chinese growth is going down. Indian growth seems to be going down. In this country we’ve done better in terms of efficiencies and our demands are starting to drop, so in terms of what economically you can expect, you will expect the opposite, or at least I do over the next several years, that oil prices will in fact go lower. Natural gas you can – because we have a futures market, we look forward to the future and see what people are betting the price is going to be. That doesn’t go over 5$ an MCF until 2020 according to the futures markets. So although you might want… we have to drive the renewable argument some other way, because price doesn’t look like it’s going to do it.

Frances Beinecke: Look, the only thing that’s going to change that is if we finally put a price on carbon.

C.H.: Right.

F.B.: The externals of all the fossil fuel development are not incorporated in the current price, so the environmental effects, the health effects, the consequences to communities, none of that is factored in. We have to change that, get a price on carbon, drive it up so we can promote renewables and efficiencies first and foremost.​
 
cant remember the name of the documentary but fraking is very bad for wells. if the fingers stretch for 600 miles, id hate to see what happens to the water in those areas. peoples water would ignite. the gas companies wouldnt help them. they basically ruined their homestead with fracking.
 
As someone who has lived in the town that the Marcellus shale formation is named after, I'll pass on hydro fracking. Don't want it in my town.
 
Back
Top