Fox News (w video) 'How Will Ron Paul and His Supporters Vote in the Presidential Election

Obama and Romney deliberately soil the truth about who they are, big government progressivists. After watching both men roll around on the bed together last night in the carnal lust of political treachery against the American people, I got up from my couch and went to the bathroom to flush the toilet. I felt a little better after that.
 
Seemed to be a fairly respectful interview, except for the part where he tried to pressure Dr. Paul into naming who he'll vote for.
 
You know why Obama does so poorly speaking without a script? He has to constantly choose his next sentence very carefully to maintain the lies that he speaks with every word, he has to maintain an entire conscious cognitive dissonance within to maintain the fake facade he has to present, as he is very aware that he spews lies at every word. And with a national history now every one in the country can see through his lies by just checking his words against actualities of the first term.

Romney on the other hand has no such problems. He has an internal pragmatic justification for every decision and position, without regards to the past, he makes that allows him to believe in what he says and thus can speak more smoothly and spin more fluently.
 
Romney on the other hand has no such problems. He has an internal pragmatic justification for every decision and position, without regards to the past, he makes that allows him to believe in what he says and thus can speak more smoothly and spin more fluently.

What's wrong with this? If anything, last night's debate made me realize we should focus getting liberty guys elected to the Senate, where you only need a few to be significant. The presidency is designed to be won by a pragmatist who has to round up everyone to the table. In the Senate, guys like Rand, etc can work on getting as much of our positions to that table.
 
The video player doesn't load when visiting the page or selecting the Ron Paul thumbnail image on the page. All the other video loads. Hmmm, imagine that. F-ing Fox does it again.

Here is the transcript for the interview........

And now they're trying to convince us Ron Paul is as unfamiliar with the English language as the rest of the Republicans out there--via an incompetent transcriptionist. Nice.
 
And now they're trying to convince us Ron Paul is as unfamiliar with the English language as the rest of the Republicans out there--via an incompetent transcriptionist. Nice.

Their transcripts are computer generated. You should see some of the weird stuff their software comes up with sometimes.
 
What's wrong with this? If anything, last night's debate made me realize we should focus getting liberty guys elected to the Senate, where you only need a few to be significant. The presidency is designed to be won by a pragmatist who has to round up everyone to the table. In the Senate, guys like Rand, etc can work on getting as much of our positions to that table.

That may be true, and certainly is our only hope for the next 4 years.
 
What's wrong with this? If anything, last night's debate made me realize we should focus getting liberty guys elected to the Senate, where you only need a few to be significant. The presidency is designed to be won by a pragmatist who has to round up everyone to the table. In the Senate, guys like Rand, etc can work on getting as much of our positions to that table.

Very true, we have to be helping out Kurt Bills right now otherwise the GOP establishment and media will say another Ron Paul type can't win.
 
Anybody noticed Ron using the term "Freedom movement" twice? Not liberty, freedom. I saw a video somewhere where someone analyzed the connotations of words that some of the paul supporters used. One of the conclusions was that freedom is a better word than liberty to use politically. Don't remember why, but I think the analysis has gotten to Ron and convinced him to drop liberty for freedom.

He's still busy with branding the idea of liberty or freedom if you will and how to draw more people into the movement.
 
Back
Top