Fox New Journalism.

"suggesting that the United States' non-interventionist policy invited the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001."

Wow, no wonder they attacked us. What with us leaving them alone and all, good thing we invaded over there now so they'll leave us alone.
 
Ha ha! Exactly.

Assuming they fix it, I wonder how long it'll take ...
 
I noticed that one, too

Just a few minutes ago, in fact. Hmmmmm.... Wonder what kind of spin they're trying to create. Perhaps an honest editorial mistake...

JImmy
 
Actually first the moderator and then Dr. Paul mispoke and said "non-intervention was a major contributing factor."

Still it is obvious what was meant and since the article doesn't take that direct quote but instead summarizes it should make it clear what was meant.

(There is a video of the quote in the first few seconds of the last video on this http://titanmiller.no-ip.org/publog/?p=93) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sk334TbliaY)
 
Fox New Journalism. That's an odd combination of words.
 
Ahh, damn! I should have proof-read. Didn't mean to leave out the 's' ... Guess it can happen to anyone (kind of ironic in that I was pointing out a mistake in the article.)
 
Emailed as well its a sad mad world... arg Ron Paul needs to be president so bad
 
Faux News

Fox News is not "fair and balanced" as they claim and they certainly don't live up to their own motto of "we report, you decide." They represent yellow journalism at its very worst, carrying the water for their neoconservative masters.
 
Back
Top