FOX (Hannity & Colmes) just announced Paul was 3rd in Iowa

[Lord Xar]

CAN SOMEONE tell me what the previous prediction percentage is for this organization?

If they say 3rd, that is all good - but if they have been seriously flawed in the past - then its sorta moot. BUT, if they have been usually pretty good at calling it, then this is a legitimate poll - in my eyes.

 

[philistineau]

Mars Attacks

 

[ItsTime]

why would fox news quote a poll that has ron paul in 3rd if they did not think it was legit in their eyes?

CAN SOMEONE tell me what the previous prediction percentage is for this organization?

If they say 3rd, that is all good - but if they have been seriously flawed in the past - then its sorta moot. BUT, if they have been usually pretty good at calling it, then this is a legitimate poll - in my eyes.

 

[Real_CaGeD]

This supports the Rudy leak story.

 

[skinzterpswizfan]

why would fox news quote a poll that has ron paul in 3rd if they did not think it was legit in their eyes?

Even better, it was announced on Hannity and Colmes, and we all know how little Hannity likes Paul.

 

[MikeStanart]

Looks like Ron Paul will be recruited for Season 11 of SG-1.

I mean, after all....Nobody else could defeat the Ori.




Yeah, i'm a huge geek.

 

[OptionsTrader]

Little known fact: Ron Paul was really the first to defeat the Replicators.

So obviously the Asgard would vote for him.

Love the picture btw.

 

[quickmike]

WHat's that movie, I forgot the name

MARS ATTACKS!!

 

[MikeStanart]

WHat's that movie, I forgot the name

Mars Attacks! I believe

 

[user]

WHat's that movie, I forgot the name

mars attacks!

 

[Eric21ND]

this was on hannity and combes?

 

[Perium]

Youtube?

 

[Lord Xar]

why would fox news quote a poll that has ron paul in 3rd if they did not think it was legit in their eyes?

First off, I NEVER trust Fox News. Never.

But my first post is in regards to "real" expectations. If we can get a basis on previous assumptions from this organization, which has Dr. Paul in 3rd, I think it could be a viable barometer for true rankings.

We all say this poll or that poll is found wanting, but we hold onto this one as if its true.
I am looking for legitimacy from this group to make a 'real' determination.

Just so you know, I don't find Rasmussen or Zogby legitimate for a few reasons. So I am not looking for cracks - I want to find legitimacy for my own assurance.

 

[schmeisser]

I hope someone utubed. The Iowa piece appeared to be Colmes doing. During Hannity's bit, he excluded RP from the AP poll graphic using only 5 down to Thompson at 12%, even though on the Democrat graphic they showed 6 down to Dodd at 1%.

They showed an oversized THIS IS NOT A SCIENTIFIC POLL graphic below the Iowa results. I didn't think this coverage was as good as many here do, but it was something.

Don't kid yourself and think Hannity has seen the light

 

[trispear]

Colmes, over and over again, for whatever motivations if any, has shown to be a much better friend to true conservatives than Hannity has. Wow!

Thank you Alan!

 

[K1RBY]

Colmes, over and over again, for whatever motivations if any, has shown to be a much better friend to true conservatives than Hannity has. Wow!

Thank you Alan!

thats because the enemy of his enemy is his friend....for now anyway.

 

[Perium]

thats because the enemy of his enemy is his friend....for now anyway.

Very True

 

[schmeisser]

Colmes, over and over again, for whatever motivations if any, has shown to be a much better friend to true conservatives than Hannity has. Wow!

Thank you Alan!

He had Dennis Hof, one of his hookers, and a lady from hookers for Jesus on his radio show last night, and after every commercial he mentioned Hof's suuport for Ron Paul. Good or bad????

 

[ItsTime]

Valid points. I am looking at it this way. Most people believe what they hear. And they are believing this.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chase-martyn/new-report-ron-paul-thir_b_75756.html

First off, I NEVER trust Fox News. Never.

But my first post is in regards to "real" expectations. If we can get a basis on previous assumptions from this organization, which has Dr. Paul in 3rd, I think it could be a viable barometer for true rankings.

We all say this poll or that poll is found wanting, but we hold onto this one as if its true.
I am looking for legitimacy from this group to make a 'real' determination.

Just so you know, I don't find Rasmussen or Zogby legitimate for a few reasons. So I am not looking for cracks - I want to find legitimacy for my own assurance.

 

[SonicInfinity]

EVERYBODY STOP!

Where's the YouTube?