Fox Focus Group EXPOSED! :)

[Eponym_mi]

What state was the first focus group in. I think that's the only big deal issue... otherwise, dude is just an undecided voter who loves Luntz.

Both debates and focus groups were in NH. So, yeah, Faux News could claim these are still undecided voters...but this late in the game? It was 4~5 months between debates! Are we supposed to believe these people have been living under a rock that long and haven't decided yet? Obvisously, these people already made up their minds just based on some of the comments...they were obvisouly shilling for certain candidates and sniping at the others.

 

[dougkeenan]

French kisses to whoever finds his IMDb page.

 

[Troyhand]

send it to Alex Jones and all the big-watched alternative media sites and well as the MSM sites. The alternative media sites will write up their own reportage to help this go viral. Also send it to all the state GOP parties including NHGOP immediately. The sponsors, the local media. Hell EVERYBODY!! lol

 

[grizzums]

Wowsers...I knew there was one more reason to pop on here before calling it a night....

I wonder how these forums were introduced..."undecided voters from NH?" ...just "undecided voters?" ...etc. (I didn't read through this whole thread, so if this has already been discussed, just disregard)

 

[hawks4ronpaul]

Maybe the focus groups were not months apart. Maybe Luntz already filmed the whole election last year in one sitting.

Make sure they have their SAG cards and paid their dues.


http://hawks4ronpaul.blogspot.com/

 

[BeFranklin]

Given that three people might be identified as in both focus groups, this suggests that FAUX may have hired people to go around to various debates. That in turn suggests that these people are being fed, given accommodation and possibly are getting paid. It also suggests that they aren't likely to be New Hampshire residents.

Paying them means its an FEC violation too

 

[PrismPaul]

Someone has to youtube the introduction of these groups from the two debates. That's what's needed to demonstrate whether or not FOX mislead the public. There's no reason they can't continue to use the same undecided group or individuals as long as they didn't state or imply that they weren't.

Does anyone have the exact words FOX used to present these groups yet?

 

[Vendico]

I don't think this is a question of law, I think it's a question of ethics.

 

[webber53]

Bump!

 

[Enzo]

More Fuel:

http://freeman4liberty.blogspot.com/2007/10/douglas-maher-is-insane.html

 

[emilysdad]

Both debates and focus groups were in NH. So, yeah, Faux News could claim these are still undecided voters...but this late in the game? It was 4~5 months between debates! Are we supposed to believe these people have been living under a rock that long and haven't decided yet? Obvisously, these people already made up their minds just based on some of the comments...they were obvisouly shilling for certain candidates and sniping at the others.

If I am not mistaken, the first focus group was in Florida not NH. Remember, the pro Rudy crowd??

 

[jake]

Murdoch and Fox are going down, this should be a HUGE blow to the Neocon's and Fox

 

[Peppy690]

i sent to drudge anyway

 

[aravoth]

Could it be the lady in red in the back is the same highlighted...need a better quality vid to go off of.

can someone please post the Youtube links for these focus groups for me? I'm just having a lot of trouble finding them- computer is going slow on the youtube search for some reason.

 

[BeFranklin]

I saw another post where an "undecided" member of Fox News' focus group also had a Romney website.

Best guess, Romney bribed people and is trying to buy the election. Where do they ever get this candidates?

 

[specsaregood]

Yes but they are violating FCC laws by fabricating the opinion and tipping the election. (same reason why Kuccinich is suing ABC)

Wrong.

http://www.organicconsumers.org/rbgh/fox-news.cfm
Fox news actually went to court and WON on appeal with, "The Fox appeal was largely on an argument that it is not technically illegal for a broadcaster to deliberately distort the news on television. The appellate justices reasoned that since state law provides whistleblower protection only for employees who object to misconduct which is against an "adopted law, rule, or regulation" and they decided prohibitions against news distortion are merely a "policy" of the FCC, the reporters' eight-year-old lawsuit must have been without merit from its
inception. "

 

[matratzac]

so we have 3 of the same people...

someone get a picture comparing EACH one
then we can send that into CNN

3 vs 1, the 3 will look SOOOOO much worse, and even 1 is worse. But if someone could take screenshots of the 3 PEOPLE? awesome!

 

[cheese]

maybe they're twins

 

[tsetsefly]

If I am not mistaken, the first focus group was in Florida not NH. Remember, the pro Rudy crowd??

anyone remember this, i think you are right...

 

[BeFranklin]

Sticky this