Minuteman2008
Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2007
- Messages
- 307
Some of us are just libertarians. You know the people RP panders to when he wants our money and votes ( depending on how you look at it). Maybe pander is the wrong word. But RP certainly knows how to campaign to appeal to freedom loving libertarians and then shift a little to the "hard right" people who seem influenced by hate/fear/bigotry,etc. This is why you will find pretty heavy support in both LP and CP types in addition to "old conservatives."
Dr. Paul differentiates himself STRONGLY from the xenophobes, at least in rhetoric. He has spoken out against Scapegoating immigrants ( as well as gays and other group the wackjobs hate) and tends to frame it more as a welfare and sovereignty ( libertarian supporting the existence of a state with borders rather than anarchist). I hope that is how he really feels.
Frankly, I think if he pushes too hard in the extreme anti-immigrant direction he risks alienating a lot of his supporters ( many who have supported him 20-30 years) who will question his true beliefs and consistency when it comes to free markets, libertarianism,etc.
He also risks losing a lot of the recent anti-war converts who make up a huge %.
Otherwise, he might as well be a CP candidate.
I think, at least in articles I've read by Paul, that he's been pretty straightforward about differentiating between legal and illegal immigration, which is mostly what the debate on immigration has been about. At least for those paying attention and not dismissing concerned citizens as "hateful, bigoted xenophobes." What is "hard right" anyway? Someone concerned with sovereignty?