I'm not pro-life. I'm pro-state's rights. But at the state level.... "pro-choice."
Yeah, that's a conflict. I do agree it's a state issue, however on the state and local, we'll be backing a Pro-Life agenda, putting the right people in office to try abortion cases as murder.
Again, Proservatives adhere completely to Ron Paul's platform, including Pro-Life. This is one of the reasons I have the utmost respect for Ron Paul. At no time in his campaign has he used a religious argument for his Pro-Life stance. Although its true his religious background coincides with the Pro-Life stance, as a politician and a political platform where religion is left out, Dr. Paul successfully makes the argument for life beginning at conception on a SCIENTIFIC basis, as a Doctor and not a man of faith. This is why we, as Proservatives, not affliliated with any Religious organization, will remain firm on our Pro-Life stance.
Proservatives firmly believe in the Constitution and that ALL people are entitled to equal rights, no matter what color, race, religion, etc. That classification includes age as well as mental state, and thus INCLUDES THE UNBORN. The unborn are equal to any other class of person and thus entitled to the same rights as all Americans.
That's why, in my opinion, the Libertarian party has fell apart. Ron Paul brought his message of Pro-Life to the Libertarian party in 1988, and ripped the party apart. The Libertarian party couldn't handle Ron Paul's COMPLETE message, and thus, fell apart. We, as Proservatives, have accepted the added responsibility of protecting our most vulnerable class of citizens, the American Unborn, and will fight until their rights are fully restored.
) This is why we've adopted Ron Paul's ENTIRE platform, and launching the Proservative Movement based on that. As it stands now, when someone asks me right now where I stand politically, I tell them I'm a "Proservative Republican" or a Rep that completely supports Ron Paul and his platform. 
