Founded on Christian principles? Griffon believes otherwise.

Interesting on the Unitarians. It's a far cry from what Unitarian Universalists have become today. I don't think most of them even believe in God. I know a lot of em. They say they are "spiritual" not religious. they have managed to mix eastern philosophies with religion...it's to the left of the New Thought movement...Unity Churches and Science of Mind. TONES
 
"During the French and Indian War, then Colonel George Washington fought a battle in which his jacket got 4 bullet holes, and he went unscathed. He gave credit to God for saving his life."

I was not arguing that they do not believe in god, they certainly did... but it is not the Christian/Jewish/Muslim god. The quotes in the essay clearly state that A) They do not believe in religion B) They saw the importance of separation of church and state.
C) Some of the founding fathers where religious, but their philosophy did not come from the bible.
 
Are you saying adultery should be illegal?
That I should be legally forced to love my neighbor and fellow man?
That freedom is only under your god's will?
That I must partake in charity?


Your list is crap.

Isn't adultery a violation of contract? Don't you expect that your contractual rights should be protected by law?
 
I thought I'd share some interesting book passages.

"...for by some time in his twenties [Thomas] Jefferson had rejected both the Trinity and the Bible's miraculous explanations for physical phenomena. He also came to believe that a self-serving priesthood, starting with Paul, had encrusted Christianity with creed and dogma as to distort the simple teaching of Jesus--all commonplaces of Enlightenment secularlism. Nonetheless, Jefferson considered himself a 'real' Christian, described the moral system of Jesus as the most 'sublime ever preached to man,' and believed in a future state of rewards and punishments. His anticlericalism, moreover, was usually directed against the early church fathers, or pointed at the New England Calvinists on whose 'formidable sway' he blamed for both New England religion and politics. But if he wanted nothing to do with 'pious young monks from Harvard and Yale,' Jefferson had many friends among the Anglican clergy whom he regarded as enlightened and moderate. He sponsored young men for training and ordination in England; following disestablishment of the Virginia Anglican church, it was Jefferson who organized a voluntary subscription to pay the salaries of his parish minister and clerk. His personal religious practices included assiduous reading of the Bible and theology, regular churchgoing, and baptism, marriage, and burial within the Church of England for himself and family. Jefferson may well have participated in the ceremonial aspects of his church--while declining to stand godfather for a friend and, so far as we know, to take communion--because he believed that religious observance promoted public virtue and social harmony.

George Washington's active membership in the Anglican church also reflected in his part his sense of community and public leadership. No member of the Truro Parish Vestry attended meetings more faithfully than did Washington during the years he was at home. Moreover, Washington's minister at Pohick Church reportedly stated that he 'never knew so constant an attendant on church as Washington.' Because Washington believed that the church fostered morality and social stability, he no doubt considered it his duty to set a good example." p. 101-102
Under the Cope of Heaven: Religion, Society, and Politics in Colonial America - Patricia Bonomi

"A few weeks before his death [Ben] Franklin in a letter to President Stiles of Yale College wrote the following statement regarding Jesus:

'As to Jesus of Nazareth, my opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the System of Morals and Religion, as he left them to us, the best the World ever saw or is likely to see; but I apprehend it has recieved various corrupting Changes, and I have, with most present Dissenters in England, some doubts as to his Divinity, tho' it is a question I do not dogmatize upon, having never studied it, and think it needless to busy myself with it now, when I expect soon an Opportunity of knowing the Truth with less trouble. I see no harm, however, in its being believed, if that belief has the good consequence, as probably it has, of making his Doctrines more respected and better obsvereved; especially as I do not perceive, that the Supreme takes it amiss, by distinguishing the Unbelievers in his Government of the World with any peculiar marks of his Displeasure.'

Like both Madison and Jefferson, Franklin accepted the ministrations of the Episcopal Church, but was never a communicant, while his friendship with George Whitefield and his support of the kind of religious activity in which the great evangelist was engaged, is proof conclusive that he at least believed various types of religious expression." p. 337 Religion in Colonial America - William Warren Sweet
 
Last edited:
Didn't Jefferson establish weekly church services in the senate chambers? CHRISTIAN services? Yes. So..that really debunks all that "separation of church and state". TONES
 
Here is an interesting article..kinda long but very important. TONES






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FAITH UNDER FIRE
Jefferson advocated 'gate' between church and state
Pastor's research says 'deist' described himself as Christian

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: February 21, 2007
1:00 am Eastern


By Bob Unruh
© 2008 WorldNetDaily.com






Thomas Jefferson's Monticello

Thomas Jefferson, credited with penning the famous "wall of separation between Church and State" on which many secular organization have rested their hopes of eliminating Christianity from the public square, actually believed in a "gate" allowing free passage between the two, according to a researcher who's reviewed Library of Congress documents.

How else, asked Todd DuBord, senior pastor at Lake Almanor Community Church, could Jefferson as president in 1803 recommended a treaty with the Kaskaskia Indians in which U.S. taxpayers promised to pay $100 a year for seven years "for the support of a [Catholic] priest …" and made a commitment that "the United States will further give the sum of three hundred dollars to assist the said tribe in the erection of a church…"

And how else could Jefferson, as president, have held Christian church services in the executive branch buildings, the U.S. House of Representatives, and even the U.S. Supreme Court chambers? he asked.

"I used to believe in 'a wall of separation between Church and State,'" DuBord wrote in a compilation of his research prepared for his church website. "After researching the religion and politics of Thomas Jefferson in the Library of Congress, I now understand that barrier was a gate Jefferson would often pass through."






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FAITH UNDER FIRE
Jefferson advocated 'gate' between church and state
Pastor's research says 'deist' described himself as Christian

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: February 21, 2007
1:00 am Eastern


By Bob Unruh
© 2008 WorldNetDaily.com






Thomas Jefferson's Monticello

Thomas Jefferson, credited with penning the famous "wall of separation between Church and State" on which many secular organization have rested their hopes of eliminating Christianity from the public square, actually believed in a "gate" allowing free passage between the two, according to a researcher who's reviewed Library of Congress documents.

How else, asked Todd DuBord, senior pastor at Lake Almanor Community Church, could Jefferson as president in 1803 recommended a treaty with the Kaskaskia Indians in which U.S. taxpayers promised to pay $100 a year for seven years "for the support of a [Catholic] priest …" and made a commitment that "the United States will further give the sum of three hundred dollars to assist the said tribe in the erection of a church…"

And how else could Jefferson, as president, have held Christian church services in the executive branch buildings, the U.S. House of Representatives, and even the U.S. Supreme Court chambers? he asked.

"I used to believe in 'a wall of separation between Church and State,'" DuBord wrote in a compilation of his research prepared for his church website. "After researching the religion and politics of Thomas Jefferson in the Library of Congress, I now understand that barrier was a gate Jefferson would often pass through."

(Story continues below)


DuBord, who was exposed to the conflict between the actual Christian heritage of the United States and what is being portrayed as the nation's secular heritage while on a tour of the Washington, D.C., and nearby areas, has researched the nation's Christian heritage through materials from the Library of Congress, and has been submitting requests that agencies responsible for that information be more accurate.

For example, WND has reported that he's been campaigning with the U.S. Supreme Court to provide information that the stone tablet in the East Wall Frieze actually represents the Ten Commandments, not the ten amendments as current public information states. His documentation on the church's website shows historical documents overwhelmingly support the Ten Commandments description.

WND earlier reported on his documentation of the other representations of the Ten Commandments in the Supreme Court Building.

His newest research includes pages of documentation of Jefferson's active support for the teachings of Jesus, even to the point of federal subsidies for the support of missionaries, the construction of churches, the publication of the Bible and other key outreaches.

Now he's seeking some corrections from the foundation that runs Jefferson's Monticello home, and offers information to visitors. He noted that on his recent trip, a tour guide, although "cordial and informative about many matters," became abrupt and even a little "arrogant" when asked about Jefferson's faith.

"We all know Jefferson was a strict deist, who ardently fought for the separation of Church and State," the guide announced at the historic site run by the private, nonprofit Thomas Jefferson Foundation, DuBord said.

But DuBord said his research actually supports the concept that Jefferson was more religious than most people know, and "used both his government positions and even funds on occasion to establish churches, distribute biblical information, and promote Christianity."

"As a result, I am again respectfully requesting that a fuller view of Thomas Jefferson and his intermingling of government and religion (specifically Christianity) be reinvestigated and reintroduced into the Monticello tour guides' information and education," he said in his newest request.

Near the end of his life, Jefferson said in letters to Dr. Benjamin Waterhouse, on June 26, 1822; to William Canby, on Sept. 18, 1813; and to Charles Thomson, on Jan. 9, 1816, that:


The doctrines of Jesus are simple, and tend to all the happiness of man…
Of all the systems of morality, ancient or modern which have come under my observation, none appears to me so pure as that of Jesus…

I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus.

DuBord explained his research convinced him that Jefferson was opposed to the "tyranny and corruptions" of Christianity, but not to the teachings of Jesus himself. In a letter to Dr. Benjamin Rush, he said, "I am a Christian, in the only sense he wished any to be; sincerely attached to his doctrines, in preference to all others."


A Jefferson letter calling himself a Christian

DuBord concluded that Jefferson probably was not an evangelical Christian, and probably wasn't orthodox in most of his doctrine, but he certainly was not "a dogmatic deist with a secular progressive agenda to rid religion (specifically Christianity) from government, as he is often conveyed, even by our tour guide at Jefferson's estate, Monticello, in July of 2006."

DuBord said the background from which Jefferson came is important to understanding his dislike of the "business" of Christianity. England had a state-supported church and in Virginia, Jefferson's home, the Church of England also was funded by taxes.

In his "Notes" from the Library of Congress, it says Jefferson also was exposed to the religious intolerance of the anti-Quaker laws, and suffered the opposition of some church leaders during his presidential campaign.

A friend once noted of Jefferson that he didn't oppose Christianity, just the "tyranny" different sects imposed on people.

It is within those parameters then, that he wrote to the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut, whose members expressed concern he would endorse a state church:


Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative power of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church and State.

Jefferson letter erecting 'wall' of separation

DuBord said those words were written in reaction and possibly retaliation to the verbal attacks he'd endured from clergy. In another letter he called them an "irritable tribe of priests."

But when he was called on to express his beliefs, such as in recommending a seal for the U.S., Jefferson first suggested one that reflected the "children of Israel in the Wilderness, led by a Cloud by Day, and Pillar of Fire by night…" DuBord found.

Does such a symbol, he asked, "seem like they could come from those who are ardently in favor of the separation of Church and State?" And from a man, who two days after writing the letter to the Danbury Baptists, would attend a worship service inside the U.S. House of Representatives?

"Can anyone today see a president taking such Christian actions, signing such treaties, or using governmental monies to further 'promote Christianity' as Jefferson did?" asked DuBord. "Does his intermingling of religion and politics seem like deeds of the 'Thomas Jefferson' so often conveyed today in educational circles and at Monticello?

"If Thomas Jefferson espoused a wall of separation between Church and State, he also breached it, by merging Christianity and politics over and over again," DuBord said.

He said perhaps the best summary of the relation between government and Christianity during a time when Jefferson was heavily involved in that government comes from the Library of Congress:


The Continental-Confederation Congress, a legislative body that governed the United States from 1774 to 1789, contained an extraordinary number of deeply religious men. The amount of energy that Congress invested in encouraging the practice of religion in the new nation exceeded that expended by any subsequent American national government. Although the Articles of Confederation did not officially authorize Congress to concern itself with religion, the citizenry did not object to such activities. This lack of objection suggests that both the legislators and the public considered it appropriate for the national government to promote a nondenominational, nonpolemical Christianity.
Congress appointed chaplains for itself and the armed forces, sponsored the publication of a Bible, imposed Christian morality on the armed forces, and granted public lands to promote Christianity among the Indians. National days of thanksgiving and of "humiliation, fasting, and prayer" were proclaimed by Congress at least twice a year throughout the war. Congress was guided by "covenant theology," a Reformation doctrine especially dear to New England Puritans, which held that God bound himself in an agreement with a nation and its people. This agreement stipulated that they "should be prosperous or afflicted, according as their general Obedience or Disobedience thereto appears." Wars and revolutions were, accordingly, considered afflictions, as divine punishments for sin, from which a nation could rescue itself by repentance and reformation.

"While he was an advocate for the separation of the State from aligning with any specific national Church, he was not attempting to neuter government from Christian influence," DuBord said.

In fact, Jefferson wrote in 1781: "The God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift from God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, and that His justice cannot sleep forever."

"While Jefferson conveyed deistic tendencies at times in his writings, denied Jesus’ miracles and deity, and certainly was Unitarian in his theology, his faith was far more complex than 'strict deism.' On the other hand, as he wrote to William Short on October 31, 1819, he declared that the teachings of Jesus contained the 'outlines of a system of the most sublime morality which has ever fallen from the lips of man,'" DuBord said.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54349
 
Here is an interesting article..kinda long but very important. TONES






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FAITH UNDER FIRE
Jefferson advocated 'gate' between church and state
Pastor's research says 'deist' described himself as Christian

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: February 21, 2007
1:00 am Eastern


By Bob Unruh
© 2008 WorldNetDaily.com






Thomas Jefferson's Monticello

Thomas Jefferson, credited with penning the famous "wall of separation between Church and State" on which many secular organization have rested their hopes of eliminating Christianity from the public square, actually believed in a "gate" allowing free passage between the two, according to a researcher who's reviewed Library of Congress documents.

How else, asked Todd DuBord, senior pastor at Lake Almanor Community Church, could Jefferson as president in 1803 recommended a treaty with the Kaskaskia Indians in which U.S. taxpayers promised to pay $100 a year for seven years "for the support of a [Catholic] priest …" and made a commitment that "the United States will further give the sum of three hundred dollars to assist the said tribe in the erection of a church…"

And how else could Jefferson, as president, have held Christian church services in the executive branch buildings, the U.S. House of Representatives, and even the U.S. Supreme Court chambers? he asked.

"I used to believe in 'a wall of separation between Church and State,'" DuBord wrote in a compilation of his research prepared for his church website. "After researching the religion and politics of Thomas Jefferson in the Library of Congress, I now understand that barrier was a gate Jefferson would often pass through."






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FAITH UNDER FIRE
Jefferson advocated 'gate' between church and state
Pastor's research says 'deist' described himself as Christian

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: February 21, 2007
1:00 am Eastern


By Bob Unruh
© 2008 WorldNetDaily.com






Thomas Jefferson's Monticello

Thomas Jefferson, credited with penning the famous "wall of separation between Church and State" on which many secular organization have rested their hopes of eliminating Christianity from the public square, actually believed in a "gate" allowing free passage between the two, according to a researcher who's reviewed Library of Congress documents.

How else, asked Todd DuBord, senior pastor at Lake Almanor Community Church, could Jefferson as president in 1803 recommended a treaty with the Kaskaskia Indians in which U.S. taxpayers promised to pay $100 a year for seven years "for the support of a [Catholic] priest …" and made a commitment that "the United States will further give the sum of three hundred dollars to assist the said tribe in the erection of a church…"

And how else could Jefferson, as president, have held Christian church services in the executive branch buildings, the U.S. House of Representatives, and even the U.S. Supreme Court chambers? he asked.

"I used to believe in 'a wall of separation between Church and State,'" DuBord wrote in a compilation of his research prepared for his church website. "After researching the religion and politics of Thomas Jefferson in the Library of Congress, I now understand that barrier was a gate Jefferson would often pass through."

(Story continues below)


DuBord, who was exposed to the conflict between the actual Christian heritage of the United States and what is being portrayed as the nation's secular heritage while on a tour of the Washington, D.C., and nearby areas, has researched the nation's Christian heritage through materials from the Library of Congress, and has been submitting requests that agencies responsible for that information be more accurate.

For example, WND has reported that he's been campaigning with the U.S. Supreme Court to provide information that the stone tablet in the East Wall Frieze actually represents the Ten Commandments, not the ten amendments as current public information states. His documentation on the church's website shows historical documents overwhelmingly support the Ten Commandments description.

WND earlier reported on his documentation of the other representations of the Ten Commandments in the Supreme Court Building.

His newest research includes pages of documentation of Jefferson's active support for the teachings of Jesus, even to the point of federal subsidies for the support of missionaries, the construction of churches, the publication of the Bible and other key outreaches.

Now he's seeking some corrections from the foundation that runs Jefferson's Monticello home, and offers information to visitors. He noted that on his recent trip, a tour guide, although "cordial and informative about many matters," became abrupt and even a little "arrogant" when asked about Jefferson's faith.

"We all know Jefferson was a strict deist, who ardently fought for the separation of Church and State," the guide announced at the historic site run by the private, nonprofit Thomas Jefferson Foundation, DuBord said.

But DuBord said his research actually supports the concept that Jefferson was more religious than most people know, and "used both his government positions and even funds on occasion to establish churches, distribute biblical information, and promote Christianity."

"As a result, I am again respectfully requesting that a fuller view of Thomas Jefferson and his intermingling of government and religion (specifically Christianity) be reinvestigated and reintroduced into the Monticello tour guides' information and education," he said in his newest request.

Near the end of his life, Jefferson said in letters to Dr. Benjamin Waterhouse, on June 26, 1822; to William Canby, on Sept. 18, 1813; and to Charles Thomson, on Jan. 9, 1816, that:


The doctrines of Jesus are simple, and tend to all the happiness of man…
Of all the systems of morality, ancient or modern which have come under my observation, none appears to me so pure as that of Jesus…

I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus.

DuBord explained his research convinced him that Jefferson was opposed to the "tyranny and corruptions" of Christianity, but not to the teachings of Jesus himself. In a letter to Dr. Benjamin Rush, he said, "I am a Christian, in the only sense he wished any to be; sincerely attached to his doctrines, in preference to all others."


A Jefferson letter calling himself a Christian

DuBord concluded that Jefferson probably was not an evangelical Christian, and probably wasn't orthodox in most of his doctrine, but he certainly was not "a dogmatic deist with a secular progressive agenda to rid religion (specifically Christianity) from government, as he is often conveyed, even by our tour guide at Jefferson's estate, Monticello, in July of 2006."

DuBord said the background from which Jefferson came is important to understanding his dislike of the "business" of Christianity. England had a state-supported church and in Virginia, Jefferson's home, the Church of England also was funded by taxes.

In his "Notes" from the Library of Congress, it says Jefferson also was exposed to the religious intolerance of the anti-Quaker laws, and suffered the opposition of some church leaders during his presidential campaign.

A friend once noted of Jefferson that he didn't oppose Christianity, just the "tyranny" different sects imposed on people.

It is within those parameters then, that he wrote to the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut, whose members expressed concern he would endorse a state church:


Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative power of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church and State.

Jefferson letter erecting 'wall' of separation

DuBord said those words were written in reaction and possibly retaliation to the verbal attacks he'd endured from clergy. In another letter he called them an "irritable tribe of priests."

But when he was called on to express his beliefs, such as in recommending a seal for the U.S., Jefferson first suggested one that reflected the "children of Israel in the Wilderness, led by a Cloud by Day, and Pillar of Fire by night…" DuBord found.

Does such a symbol, he asked, "seem like they could come from those who are ardently in favor of the separation of Church and State?" And from a man, who two days after writing the letter to the Danbury Baptists, would attend a worship service inside the U.S. House of Representatives?

"Can anyone today see a president taking such Christian actions, signing such treaties, or using governmental monies to further 'promote Christianity' as Jefferson did?" asked DuBord. "Does his intermingling of religion and politics seem like deeds of the 'Thomas Jefferson' so often conveyed today in educational circles and at Monticello?

"If Thomas Jefferson espoused a wall of separation between Church and State, he also breached it, by merging Christianity and politics over and over again," DuBord said.

He said perhaps the best summary of the relation between government and Christianity during a time when Jefferson was heavily involved in that government comes from the Library of Congress:


The Continental-Confederation Congress, a legislative body that governed the United States from 1774 to 1789, contained an extraordinary number of deeply religious men. The amount of energy that Congress invested in encouraging the practice of religion in the new nation exceeded that expended by any subsequent American national government. Although the Articles of Confederation did not officially authorize Congress to concern itself with religion, the citizenry did not object to such activities. This lack of objection suggests that both the legislators and the public considered it appropriate for the national government to promote a nondenominational, nonpolemical Christianity.
Congress appointed chaplains for itself and the armed forces, sponsored the publication of a Bible, imposed Christian morality on the armed forces, and granted public lands to promote Christianity among the Indians. National days of thanksgiving and of "humiliation, fasting, and prayer" were proclaimed by Congress at least twice a year throughout the war. Congress was guided by "covenant theology," a Reformation doctrine especially dear to New England Puritans, which held that God bound himself in an agreement with a nation and its people. This agreement stipulated that they "should be prosperous or afflicted, according as their general Obedience or Disobedience thereto appears." Wars and revolutions were, accordingly, considered afflictions, as divine punishments for sin, from which a nation could rescue itself by repentance and reformation.

"While he was an advocate for the separation of the State from aligning with any specific national Church, he was not attempting to neuter government from Christian influence," DuBord said.

In fact, Jefferson wrote in 1781: "The God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift from God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, and that His justice cannot sleep forever."

"While Jefferson conveyed deistic tendencies at times in his writings, denied Jesus’ miracles and deity, and certainly was Unitarian in his theology, his faith was far more complex than 'strict deism.' On the other hand, as he wrote to William Short on October 31, 1819, he declared that the teachings of Jesus contained the 'outlines of a system of the most sublime morality which has ever fallen from the lips of man,'" DuBord said.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54349

Did he really call himself a Christian? Can you link me a quote in his own words, because I have a hard time believing pastors words. For... Most Christians are Self Righteous. After reading personal quotes, in their own words... I have trouble believing others(ex: It has been said: it has been said.. bs I want to know what they said), and their words point me to deism.
 
Did he really call himself a Christian? Can you link me a quote in his own words, because I have a hard time believing pastors words. For... Most Christians are Self Righteous. After reading personal quotes, in their own words... I have trouble believing others(ex: It has been said: it has been said.. bs I want to know what they said), and their words point me to deism.

Side note: After reading a bit more, it talks about how Jefferson believed in god... Of course he did, it just was not the Christian/Jewish/Muslim one. And just because he was tolerant to Christianity does not mean he favored Christianity, he had the reasoning for all religions hence 1st amendment. Also when the founding fathers say
god, it does not mean the Christian one. Thomas Paine believed in god, but it was not a Christian one.

"The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion." -- George Washington
 
Last edited:
Religion and the Founding of the American Republic

The following comes from the Library of Congress.

Religion and the Congress of the Confederation, 1774-1789

The Continental-Confederation Congress, a legislative body that governed the United States from 1774 to 1789, contained an extraordinary number of deeply religious men. The amount of energy that Congress invested in encouraging the practice of religion in the new nation exceeded that expended by any subsequent American national government. Although the Articles of Confederation did not officially authorize Congress to concern itself with religion, the citizenry did not object to such activities. This lack of objection suggests that both the legislators and the public considered it appropriate for the national government to promote a nondenominational, nonpolemical Christianity.

Congress appointed chaplains for itself and the armed forces, sponsored the publication of a Bible, imposed Christian morality on the armed forces, and granted public lands to promote Christianity among the Indians. National days of thanksgiving and of "humiliation, fasting, and prayer" were proclaimed by Congress at least twice a year throughout the war. Congress was guided by "covenant theology," a Reformation doctrine especially dear to New England Puritans, which held that God bound himself in an agreement with a nation and its people. This agreement stipulated that they "should be prosperous or afflicted, according as their general Obedience or Disobedience thereto appears." Wars and revolutions were, accordingly, considered afflictions, as divine punishments for sin, from which a nation could rescue itself by repentance and reformation.

The first national government of the United States, was convinced that the "public prosperity" of a society depended on the vitality of its religion. Nothing less than a "spirit of universal reformation among all ranks and degrees of our citizens," Congress declared to the American people, would "make us a holy, that so we may be a happy people."

The Liberty Window
vc006409.jpg

At its initial meeting in September 1774 Congress invited the Reverend Jacob Duché (1738-1798), rector of Christ Church, Philadelphia, to open its sessions with prayer. Duché ministered to Congress in an unofficial capacity until he was elected the body's first chaplain on July 9, 1776. He defected to the British the next year. Pictured here in the bottom stained-glass panel is the first prayer in Congress, delivered by Duché. The top part of this extraordinary stained glass window depicts the role of churchmen in compelling King John to sign the Magna Carta in 1215.

Congressional Fast Day Proclamation
f0404s.jpg

Congress proclaimed days of fasting and of thanksgiving annually throughout the Revolutionary War. This proclamation by Congress set May 17, 1776, as a "day of Humiliation, Fasting and Prayer" throughout the colonies. Congress urges its fellow citizens to "confess and bewail our manifold sins and transgressions, and by a sincere repentance and amendment of life, appease his [God's] righteous displeasure, and through the merits and mediation of Jesus Christ, obtain his pardon and forgiveness." Massachusetts ordered a "suitable Number" of these proclamations be printed so "that each of the religious Assemblies in this Colony, may be furnished with a Copy of the same" and added the motto "God Save This People" as a substitute for "God Save the King."

Morality in the Army
vc006576.jpg

Congress was apprehensive about the moral condition of the American army and navy and took steps to see that Christian morality prevailed in both organizations. In the Articles of War, seen below, governing the conduct of the Continental Army (seen above) (adopted, June 30, 1775; revised, September 20, 1776), Congress devoted three of the four articles in the first section to the religious nurture of the troops. Article 2 "earnestly recommended to all officers and soldiers to attend divine services." Punishment was prescribed for those who behaved "indecently or irreverently" in churches, including courts-martial, fines and imprisonments. Chaplains who deserted their troops were to be court-martialed.

Aitken's Bible Endorsed by Congress
vc006472.jpg
[/IMG]
vc006473.jpg

The war with Britain cut off the supply of Bibles to the United States with the result that on Sept. 11, 1777, Congress instructed its Committee of Commerce to import 20,000 Bibles from "Scotland, Holland or elsewhere." On January 21, 1781, Philadelphia printer Robert Aitken (1734-1802) petitioned Congress to officially sanction a publication of the Old and New Testament which he was preparing at his own expense. Congress "highly approve the pious and laudable undertaking of Mr. Aitken, as subservient to the interest of religion . . . in this country, and . . . they recommend this edition of the bible to the inhabitants of the United States." This resolution was a result of Aitken's successful accomplishment of his project.

Northwest Ordinance
vc006502.jpg

In the summer of 1787 Congress revisited the issue of religion in the new western territories and passed, July 13, 1787, the famous Northwest Ordinance. Article 3 of the Ordinance contained the following language: "Religion, Morality and knowledge being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, Schools and the means of education shall be forever encouraged." Scholars have been puzzled that, having declared religion and morality indispensable to good government, Congress did not, like some of the state governments that had written similar declarations into their constitutions, give financial assistance to the churches in the West.

Christianizing the Delawares
vc006403.jpg
vc006404.jpg

In this resolution, Congress makes public lands available to a group for religious purposes. Responding to a plea from Bishop John Ettwein (1721-1802), Congress voted that 10,000 acres on the Muskingum River in the present state of Ohio "be set apart and the property thereof be vested in the Moravian Brethren . . . or a society of the said Brethren for civilizing the Indians and promoting Christianity." The Delaware Indians were the intended beneficiaries of this Congressional resolution.

These examples are in no way exhaustive in showing how our nation was heavily influenced by the Christian religion, for there are many more examples that could be shown to prove that our country was established on Christian principles. The most important thing to understand is when you study any historical document, you should always keep three things in mind.
  1. You must evaluate words and ideas in the context of the era in which they were used. Words change meaning from generation to generation; therefore, it is necessary to define words in their historical context.
  2. To understand properly the intent of a document, say the Constitution, you must know the intent of the writer.
  3. You must understand the historical situations that led to the development of the historical document. What led our Founders to direct certain prohibitions against the national government while insuring the freedoms of the individual States? There must be a history behind their fears.
John Adams once said, "Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." He even went on to say that our American independence was achieved upon the principles of Christianity, stating,

The general Principles, on which the Fathers Atchieved Independence, were the only Principles in which that beautiful Assembly of young Gentlemen could Unite, and these Principles only could be intended by them in their Address, or by me in my Answer. And what were these general Principles? I answer, the general Principles of Christianity, in which all those Sects were united: And the general Principles of English and American Liberty, in which all those young Men United, and which had United all Parties in America, in Majorities sufficient to assert and maintain her Independence.

This, to me, seems to fly in the face of those who seek to undermine the obvious religious heritage of our country. Our Founders didn't just inculcate Christianity into our forms of government based on its propositional truths; they lived it because our early American culture was imbedded with Christianity as a way of life.
 
If this nation was founded on religious principles, then it needs to be re-founded on rational ones.
 
Christianity is the Precondition for Rationality

If this nation was founded on religious principles, then it needs to be re-founded on rational ones.

This nation was founded on rational principles--the principles of Christianity. The "atheists" over in France during that time tried to establish their government on "rational" humanistic principles during the "Reign of Terror" of the French Revolution, but inevitably it failed because any mixture of "atheism" with the State is inherently irrational.
 
Love thy neighbor as thyself...
Those who live by the sword...die by the sword...
God is love...

That's irrational? tones
 
There certainly is an increased push out there to convince everyone that this country was not founded on Christian principles and to turn them away from God. It looks like it's working too, unfortunately.
 
There certainly is an increased push out there to convince everyone that this country was not founded on Christian principles and to turn them away from God. It looks like it's working too, unfortunately.

That's the catch, it was not founded on Christian principles. The Majority of the population were Christian, but many founding fathers did not follow religion BUT indeed believed in God(which was not a Christian/Jewish/Muslim.

The Constitution was written on pure philosophy, debates and of course trail and error(ex: Not to use Fiat money, they had Fiat money in many colonies and it always resulted in inflation so they adopted the gold standard.)

As for me, when I read the bible given to me by my dad around the age of 5. It resembled to much of fairy tale to me and everything I was supposed to feel, I did not. Does God exist? Quite possibly(I don't know all the secrets of the universe). But if God does exist he will not be anything resembled to the books which state his nature.
 
While I appreciate where Christians (I am a Christian) are coming from from regarding the idea of the federal government being founded on Christian principles, the idea actually reflects ignorance of the intentions of the mostly Christian Founders. What Christians seem to be overlooking is the Founder's division of federal and state government powers evidenced by the 10th Amendment.
  • 10th Amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
More specifically, Christians have evidently forgotten that the Founding States had reserved government power to regulate religion for themselves regardless that they prohibited such power entirely to the federal government. Christians are understandably hostile at the federal government, particularly the corrupt USSC majority, for scandalously limiting the power of the states to cultivate religious expression by wrongly ignoring state power to address religious issues.

But the truth of the matter is that the idea that the USA, aka the federal government, was founded on so-called Christian principals, is sentimental, not rooted in the law. In other words, instead of spinning their wheels barking up the religiously sterile federal government tree to try to reclaim their religious heritage, Christians need to start blowing decades of dust off the forgotten 10th A. protected power of the states to address religious issues in order to reclaim the full enjoyment of their constitutional religious freedoms.

The series of posts at the following link should help people to understand how we got into today's c&s separation mess.
Finally, don't forget that to protect people from religious fanatics who would pirate state government power to regulate religion in order to shove their radical beliefs down people's throats, the honest interpretation of Sec. 1 of the 14th A. now limits state power to regulate religion.
 
Back
Top