Forward the press releases to mainstream media

amichel

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Messages
15
One big problem that the official campaign has is that it does almost no media outreach. All the other campaigns put out 5 press releases a day and follow every single one up with calls to every mainstream media outlet, calls both from campaign staffers and from professional Public Relations firms who have good relationships with reporters, news anchors, producers, etc. and know who to call to get a story followed up on. In contrast, the Ron Paul campaign doesn't have any Public Relations firms working for it and the official campaign staffers are too overworked to do any real media outreach. It's all they can do to get a press release out every few days, but they don't have any good media relationships or media outreach plan. The truth about the mainstream media is not that it's corrupt, it's that it's lazy and reactive. We need to *reach out* to the media!

TO DO:
Forward the press releases about how Ron Paul raised more money in the first 2 months of the 4th quarter than Romney or Giuliani raised in the full 3 months of the third quarter to every media outlet you can. The press releases are available on the www.ronpaul2008.com website. Every major newspaper and television news program has a contact us link or a news tips link and you can email them this bit of breaking news. They need to see it repeatedly or they won't run it. The Ron Paul campaign naively assumes that just issuing a press release is enough. It isn't! You have to follow up! If the campaign won't follow up, we will have to do it for them. So, the first step is to forward those press releases to every talk show on MSNBC and Fox and CNN and ABC and CBS and NBC and to the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal and the Miami Herald and the LA Times. And, crucially, we need to do this locally as well. Every local news show and every local newspaper needs to get each press release from the Ron Paul campaign 20 times in their inboxes or they won't even notice it!

Second, we all need to consistently reach out to these same media outlets and talk shows and ask them to interview Ron Paul. We can't do this with the same animosity with which we hit blogs. The right approach is: "Dear Today Show, I'm a huge fan of your show. I would love to see Diane Sawyer interview Presidential Candidate Ron Paul."

Good luck! Let's get out there and get our boy some press!
 
Great idea, I would sign on board for that. But we need someone with organizational skills (which I lack) to take charge of it.
 
"The truth about the mainstream media is not that it's corrupt, it's that it's lazy and reactive."

You couldn't be more wrong about that.

They are perhaps the single most efficient and effective corporate entity on Earth. If they want an agenda to be carried out, no truth stands in their way, no lie is too outrageous to push. If they want to destroy someone, they will go to whatever lengths are necessary no matter what and if the wish to ignore on one person or focus like a laser on another, nothing can deter them. Most Americans know more about Natalee Holloway than Ron Paul and that is not an accident, it is not incompetence, it is not laziness; it is purposeful and it is extremely efficient.
That said you are correct that the campaign ha done a terrible job of press releases, etc, Just last week I went to the campaign website and the most recent release was nine days old. That's just flat out incompetence, there should be at least one new release per day, at minimum.

IMHO
 
So have a meetup, and organize your local press releases. Decentralization is what we're all about people. Take charge and make it happen.
 
Still... RON PAUL's campaign staff should ensure communications with ALL MEDIA...

Organizations:


Broadcasting:


News Magazines:


Newspapers:


News Reels:


Online Journalism:


New Coverage:


Entertainment News:


Radio:


Television:


Internet:


Affiliates:


Educational Medias:


International Medias:


Financial Medias:


Minority Medias:
 
Most Americans know more about Natalee Holloway than Ron Paul and that is not an accident, it is not incompetence, it is not laziness; it is purposeful and it is extremely efficient.
IMHO

A fundamentally crucial point. These days one can often get more info and insight about a news issue from a girl blogging off a laptop from in her dorm room, than from the multi-million dollar old line media. Why would that EVER be possible, given the mainstream's massive resources and staff, unless that media was deliberately underreporting or suppressing information?

Think how the MSM provided tons of coverage to the Iowa straw vote, but zero emphasis on the dozens of straw votes Paul has won since? Why is there no reference ever made by MSM of the single digit polling numbers of Kerry at this point four years ago? Because nothing may intrude upon their intent to misdirect the public as much as possible, towards anointng the contenders they are currently overcovering.
 
Back
Top