Forum Trump Supporters Please Weigh In On Syria Bombing Without War Declaration

[Jan2017]

Trump didn't launch the chemical weapons strike.

Yeah, but who did ?

Syrian planes had a flight pattern for a mission sortie to Khan Sheikhoun, a city in a "rebel-held" province -
probably an unconventional enemy - ok a very unconventional rebel group.

How heavy were the Syrian bombs, and dropped from what altitude ?

The purported "chemical weapons" detonation site photo (suggested it was taken by locals from caption) makes me think
it was a ground detonation - the "crater" in the desert dust seems tiny and nothing to suggest
that it came and struck the tundra with any velocity. (It is a symmetrical circle shape)

Jus' sayin'

 

[misterx]

Yeah, but who did ?

Syrian planes had a flight pattern for a mission sortie to Khan Sheikhoun, a city in a "rebel-held" province -
probably an unconventional enemy - ok a very unconventional rebel group.

How heavy were the Syrian bombs, and dropped from what altitude ?

The purported "chemical weapons" detonation site photo (suggested it was taken by locals from caption) makes me think
it was a ground detonation - the "crater" in the desert dust seems tiny and nothing to suggest
that it came and struck the tundra with any velocity.

Jus' sayin'

It was definitely a false flag, but Trump doesn't know that.

 

[CPUd]

It was definitely a false flag, but Trump doesn't know that.

President Donald has the best intel, believe me!

 

[Jan2017]

It was definitely a false flag, but Trump doesn't know that.

That is the problem . . . a hasty decision.

In business if Trump walks away from the deal or it goes bust - he declares bankruptcy or something . . . and moves on.

 

[undergroundrr]

That is the problem . . . a hasty decision.

In business if Trump walks away from the deal or it goes bust - he declares bankruptcy or something . . . and moves on.

That's been my problem with his approach. In business, if he tries something wild and it fails, so what, make up for it with another success.

In the intercourse of nations, if you try something wild and it fails, you get mountains of corpses and years of consequences. Woe to those who think that yesterday was an isolated event with no ripples.

 

[nikcers]

Yeah, but who did ?

Pentagon: He who smelt it dealt it.
http://www.breitbart.com/national-s...rticipated-in-syrian-chemical-weapons-attack/

Russia has failed to control the Syrian government’s use of chemical weapons.

 

[AuH20]

https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...llusioned-supporters/522336/?utm_source=atltw

 

[Mordan]

Rand "towing" the establishment line:

Before 2016. Do you wonder why I was not excited at all with Rand? Because Rand was playing the establishment card. But CPUD your paying masters want the establishment card. Your paying masters actually want to box Rand into a controllable tool.
CPUD. you are not winning hearts with your propaganda.

 

[CPUd]

Before 2016. Do you wonder why I was not excited at all with Rand? Because Rand was playing the establishment card. But CPUD your paying masters want the establishment card. Your paying masters actually want to box Rand into a controllable tool.
CPUD. you are not winning hearts with your propaganda.

What paying masters this is a new one

 

[Jan2017]

http://www.breitbart.com/national-s...rticipated-in-syrian-chemical-weapons-attack/

“between 12 and 100 Russian military personnel” were present at the base, complete with their own barracks, which the U.S. “took pains” to avoid blowing up. If the chemical weapons attack on Idlib province was indeed conducted from the base, it would be very difficult for the Russians to argue they were unaware a war crime was in progress under their noses.

The very first early response from the Russian Foreign Minister was a harsh statement - something to the effect that
"Russia support for Syria is not unconditional"

It sounds like - unless everyone is just blowing smoke up everyone's arse now - Russia didn't know much of anything about the gas attack at first either.
Russia left it open in that Syria could act independently as 'Russia has failed to control the Syrian government's use of chemical weapons."

Half a day later when the airbase they share is implicated, Russia states it is not true. It is neither of them.

If Trump is told they need to take out that airbase - gets convinced - and is allowed to go through with it
in order "that no future chemical weapons attacks originate from that airfield" - and does it immediately before it can get moved,
then there "plausibly" could have been nerve gas released at the air base from a stockpile after the US blitzkreig attack.

 

[spudea]

 

[CaptUSA]

Now, that's some serious cuckery, right there!!

 

[wizardwatson]

https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...llusioned-supporters/522336/?utm_source=atltw

Asked for comment for this piece, Coulter declined in an email.

“I’m too depressed,” she said.

It is depressing. A lot of people in my life had hopes for Trump, many voted for Trump.

Trump picked a side, and it isn't the people.

Maybe he was sincere, maybe the stress got to him. Doesn't matter. He won't come back from this. Barring him going to prison and finding Jesus, or something on that level, all trust evaporated. He's a zombie-Nazi now. He took the blue pill.

 

[Athan]

Now, that's some serious cuckery, right there!!

Let no one accuse them of consistency, heh.

 

[AuH20]

Coulter is one of the best mainstream voices out there.

 

[CPUd]

Coulter is one of the best mainstream voices out there.

She's coming around?

 

[nikcers]

What the fuck internet, I come on here, to see a bunch of people bitching about Trump's illegal bombing in Syria and we have partisan praise everywhere. I keep seeing people say I don't agree with Trump on this, but what he did in Syria is the fucking bees neez. This is so far removed from what we need to be doing right now. I want my Ron Paul internet back.

 

[navy-vet]

Well, I don't think that anyone who condones the slaughter of full term babies, like those who would have seen Hillary as CC, either directly or otherwise, has any hope of understanding what might have motivated Trump to order that strike.

 

[anaconda]

She's coming around?

She's catching on, I'm telling ya!

 

[anaconda]

bump