Former Trumpers Join "No Kings" (I attended)

No, you believe in globalism and the great replacement, and in using the impossible perfect to prevent any possible good.

It's only impossible because people like you exist. You are so authoritarian you wouldn't know what to do with freedom/liberty and actual fiscal responsibility.

In time, the clutch of the fist will be so tight, that we will slip through your grimy fingers and be done with you.
 
And there are merits to that approach.

The "incremental" approach has 1) proven to generally be a failure, and 2) is in many ways designed to keep us placated so that we dont take more drastic measures
I haven't seen his approach achieve anything but handing the left victory after victory.
 
No, he just fought every attempt to stop it and every attempt to secure the border or deport them.

Instead he spoke out against the wholesale, organized, government - sponsored importation of them. Meanwhile, at the border, the government wasn't stopping them. What stopped them was ending the organized, government - sponsored importation of them.

So you advocated ineffective means and he advocated effective means of doing the same damned thing. Cry harder, fool.
 
It's only impossible because people like you exist. You are so authoritarian you wouldn't know what to do with freedom/liberty and actual fiscal responsibility.

In time, the clutch of the fist will be so tight, that we will slip through your grimy fingers and be done with you.
It's impossible because most people are far worse than you claim I am, through ignorance or corruption, and they always will be, it's human nature.
And you believe in letting people much worse than the average republican invade by the millions to make sure it never gets any closer to possible.

The world will never exist where everyone is what you pretend to be, there will never be a "New Anarchist Man, you know this full well, but you use pie in the sky utopianism to block opposition to the globalist left.
 
Instead he spoke out against the wholesale, organized, government - sponsored importation of them. Meanwhile, at the border, the government wasn't stopping them. What stopped them was ending the organized, government - sponsored importation of them.

So you advocated ineffective means and he advocated effective means of doing the same damned thing. Cry harder, fool.
What stopped them was Trump securing the border with the wall and boots on the ground, they came in excessive numbers before the globalist machine was set up to make things even worse.
Naturally he gave lip service to the approach that if followed would only have boiled the frog slowly and prevented it from jumping out of the pot.
 
Oh? Trump completed the wall?

When? How did he do it in a day?
He built a lot of it, and continues to build the rest of it.
He started with the parts that would be most effective, and in combination with the boots on the ground it has brought new crossing close to zero.
 
It's impossible because most people are far worse than you claim I am, through ignorance or corruption, and they always will be, it's human nature.
And you believe in letting people much worse than the average republican invade by the millions to make sure it never gets any closer to possible.

The world will never exist where everyone is what you pretend to be, there will never be a "New Anarchist Man, you know this full well, but you use pie in the sky utopianism to block opposition to the globalist left.

Here's what I do know. I stick to my principles and will not sway. Whatever the outcome, my hands are clean, I can't be blamed, and I sleep perfectly well at night.

The world is what you and other authoritarians [both left and right] make of it, and I'm a very firm believer that people deserve exactly what they get.

End bickering here.
 
What stopped them was Trump securing the border with the wall

Oh? Trump completed the wall?

When? How did he do it in a day?

It cracks me up the way you act like a toddler. You holler, "No!" then immediately confirm what was said. If the wall was sufficient unto the task the moment Trump was sworn in, then it wasn't working because Biden left the "big, beautiful door" (which Trump promised from the first, though I'm sure your memory is too convenient to recall it) was left open.

Which is what I said. So thanks for confirming that you're just pissy because PAF's solution is the one Trump used, and it worked. And yours didn't.
 
Here's what I do know. I stick to my principles and will not sway. Whatever the outcome, my hands are clean, I can't be blamed, and I sleep perfectly well at night.

The world is what you and other authoritarians [both left and right] make of it, and I'm a very firm believer that people deserve exactly what they get.

End bickering here.
All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing, and you work feverishly to see to it that good men do nothing, that's the principle you stick to.
 
All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing, and you work feverishly to see to it that good men do nothing, that's the principle you stick to.

Who said I do nothing? Because I don't "pick one" at the ballot box?
 
You do a lot, to ensure that good men do nothing.

687ab44e9ea7b.webp
 
Don't lie. You watch Netflix too. I would spend an hour digging up that proof, but I'm too busy at the moment.
And Hulu occasionally. One time I even watched PBS. (but don't tell anybody that)
 
And there are merits to that approach.

The "incremental" approach has 1) proven to generally be a failure, and 2) is in many ways designed to keep us placated so that we dont take more drastic measures
Pretty successful for the leftists while the politicians on the right just keep cucking, Trump included.
 
Back
Top