Former Ron Paul staffer house RAIDED by FBI (full video)

Matt Collins

Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2007
Messages
47,707
The FBI violently raided the house of the family of a former Ron Paul staffer who is being accused of campaign finance law violations. The FBI also made his teenage daughters stand out side on a busy street in their underwear in front of the whole neighborhood and passing traffic. Raiding the house with guns drawn at young kids is beyond what is acceptable for an alleged crime of this nature.


Here is the full video of what happened, and write-up:

http://www.gofundme.com/defendliberty
 
"... The FBI also made his teenage daughters stand out side on a busy street in their underwear in front of the whole neighborhood and passing traffic..."
Are they over 18, and is this safe to view at work?
/ just asking...
 
"... The FBI also made his teenage daughters stand out side on a busy street in their underwear in front of the whole neighborhood and passing traffic..."
Are they over 18, and is this safe to view at work?
/ just asking...
I didn't pay too much attention but it looked like almost complete coverage of everything by a large bathrobe.
 
[Whoops Brian beat me to it] :o


Here's a tube without Mats obvious trolling for dollars link...:mad:



Obviously if you have extra money burning a hole in your pocket this dude would appreciate a hand out...
 
"... The FBI also made his teenage daughters stand out side on a busy street in their underwear in front of the whole neighborhood and passing traffic..."
Are they over 18, and is this safe to view at work?
/ just asking...

15, according to the GoFundMe note.
 
I didn't pay too much attention but it looked like almost complete coverage of everything by a large bathrobe.

No, she was underage and in her panties/t-shirt in the tube at the link Matt posted, and the news station showed it over and over and over again. One of the backside images was blurred out, but a couple of the others were not.

However I'd be willing to bet that while she wasn't too happy that the cops made her stand outside and not be able to put on some clothes in the cold weather while random people drove by, she is likely welcoming the attention it gets her on TV.
 
No, she was underage and in her panties/t-shirt in the tube at the link Matt posted, and the news station showed it over and over and over again. One of the backside images was blurred out, but a couple of the others were not.

However I'd be willing to bet that while she wasn't too happy that the cops made her stand outside and not be able to put on some clothes in the cold weather while random people drove by, she is likely welcoming the attention it gets her on TV.

No, I think that's your pedophilia talking
 
However I'd be willing to bet that while she wasn't too happy that the cops made her stand outside and not be able to put on some clothes in the cold weather while random people drove by, she is likely welcoming the attention it gets her on TV.

Sorry. I didn't notice. Thanks for correcting me. I rewatched it and was all blurred out. Anyway, to the question asked, maybe people shouldn't be reading news videos on work computers in the office anyway? :)
 
However I'd be willing to bet that while she wasn't too happy that the cops made her stand outside and not be able to put on some clothes in the cold weather while random people drove by, she is likely welcoming the attention it gets her on TV.
You are so full of crap. Any kid's heart will sink to his or her stomach when the authorities hits the family house in a raid. There's nothing glamorous about it to them. She's thinking about how her daddy might go to prison forever, not how awesome it is that thousands of dannno's will be gawking at her.
 
You are so full of crap. Any kid's heart will sink to his or her stomach when the authorities hits the family house in a raid. There's nothing glamorous about it to them. She's thinking about how her daddy might go to prison forever, not how awesome it is that thousands of dannno's will be gawking at her.

My point was that she seemed to be upset about the raid, upset about how the police treated her family and her father, upset that she had to sit out in the cold while being stared at by police officers and random passerbys and not be able to put clothes on, but not so upset that the news was going to show the footage she took of herself in her underwear over and over and over and over again. I could be wrong, just what I picked up.

Honestly I'm not sure why it was necessary to show it over and over, and some of the images were not blurred out.
 
It could be any one of us, at any time. I would be tempted to sue the Feds for child endangerment, statutory rape (well those guys were raping that little girl in her underwear, with their eyes), lewd and lascivious conduct with a child, and bullying.

These are the type crimes the ACLU should be tackling. Of course they are too busy now they are owned by the drug cartels.
 
"He violated campaign finance laws? Guess we should point firearms at his children and raid his house. And why not publicly shame his kids while we're at it?"
 
So...how is the investigation going about his involvement in the missing laptop of Jared Gamble?
 
Back
Top